Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript


[00:00:02]

YEAH, THEY TOLD ME HAD TO LEAVE BY 15.

THIS REGULAR MEETING

[Call to Order]

OF THE COFFIN COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT IS CALLED TO ORDER.

TODAY IS TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23RD, 2021.

IT'S 9:00 AM.

AND WE'RE IN THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT MEETING ROOM IN THE COURTHOUSE ANNEX.

UH, AS A NORMAL, WE'LL START OFF WITH AN INVOCATION IN A PLEDGE TO OUR FLAGS.

UH, I'LL OFFER THE INVOCATION FOR US AND COMMISSIONER KATES.

WOULD YOU LEAD US IN THE PLEDGES, PLEASE STAND FATHER.

WE'RE GRATEFUL FOR ALL THE BLESSINGS OF THIS LIFE.

UH, WE LIFT UP THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE, UH, HAD SO MUCH INCONVENIENCE AND SUFFERING BECAUSE OF THE WINTER STORMS. AND WE ASK THAT YOU, UH, PARTICULARLY BE WITH THOSE WHO WORK TO, TO SOLVE THOSE PROBLEMS FOR THEM AND ASK THAT, UH, ASK THAT YOU SPEED UP THAT PROCESS.

UM, BE WITH THOSE OF US WHO MAKE DECISIONS ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY TODAY AND, UH, HELP US TO MAKE DECISIONS THAT ARE WISE AND JUST IN BEST PRACTICES FOR OUR, FOR OUR CITIZENS.

WE ASK ALL THIS IN JESUS' NAME OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL HONOR, THE TEXAS FLAG, THE TEXAS ONE STATE WINE.

UH, WELL WELCOME EVERYBODY.

IT'S, UH, ALWAYS NICE TO HAVE FOLKS THAT COME AND SHOW AN INTEREST IN THE, IN THE WORK THAT WE'RE DOING HERE AT THE COUNTY.

UH,

[1. ROUTINE CORRESPONDENCE.]

FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS ROUTINE CORRESPONDENCE.

UH, THE SHERIFF AND I HAD HAD SOME DISCUSSIONS OVER THE WEEKEND AND I THINK THAT, AND HE HAS SOMETHING THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO BRING UP TO US TO TALK ABOUT CORRESPONDENCE THAT WE'RE WORKING ON RIGHT NOW.

GOOD MORNING, JUDGE.

GOOD MORNING COMMISSIONER.

I'D LIKE TO JUST, UH, REACH OUT AND THANK BENNY KEITH COMPANY.

UH, WE HAD SOME SHORTAGE OF WATER, I THINK IN THE SOUTH END OF THE COUNTY, EVERYBODY KIND OF SEEING WHERE WAS HE GOING WITH THAT? AND, UH, IT WAS WORKING ON GETTING QUITE A BIT OF WATER COMMISSIONER CATES AND THEM GOT THEM, GOT A BUNCH OF WATER IN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND THEN WE NEEDED A LITTLE MORE, UH, SO I'LL REACH OUT TO BENNY KEITH, THE HALLAMS, UH, WHICH ARE REAL GOOD FRIENDS OF MINE AND THEY DONATED SIX PALLETS.

I WANT TO FIND, PICK THEM UP FOR.

SO I WANT TO THANK BENNY KEITH PERSONALLY, UH, IN FRONT OF COMMISSIONERS COURT AND THE HIGHLANDS FOR WHAT THEY DO FOR US.

UH, THEY'VE GOT A LOT OF, THEY DISTRIBUTED A LOT OF STUFF IN OUR COUNTY.

THEY'VE GOT A LOT OF EMPLOYEES THAT LIVE IN OUR COUNTY, SO, UH, THEY HELPED US OUT AND THEY'RE WILLING TO HELP US OUT ANYTIME WE CAN.

SO IT'S JUST BUILDING THAT GREAT RELATIONSHIP THAT WE NEED WITH OUR PARTNERS OUT HERE.

SO I JUST WANTED TO BRING IT TO COURT AND TELL THEM, THANK YOU FOR WHAT THEY DID.

I APPRECIATE YOUR BRINGING THAT TO US.

AND, UH, LIKE WE TALKED THE OTHER DAY, I'LL ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY, I'LL SEND THEM A LETTER OF APPRECIATION THAT, AND, UH, I'VE ALSO ALREADY SENT LETTERS TO HIM ALSO.

SO, AND I APPRECIATE IT.

THANK YOU, SHERIFF.

AND ONE THING I WILL, I WANNA APPRECIATE COMMISSIONER HUNT FOR COMING TO OUR PARKING LOT AND CLEANING IT OUT.

WHERE ARE PEOPLE THAT WAS VISITING AND WORKERS DIDN'T HAVE ACCIDENTS.

SO I APPRECIATE THAT.

UH, DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY ROUTINE CORRESPONDENCE, JUDGE? I JUST ADD TO WHAT THE SHERIFF SAID THAT WE HAD, UH, A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY AND THE SURROUNDING AREA THAT THEY REALLY STEPPED UP TO TRY TO ADDRESS THE WATER SHORTAGE, UH, BASED, UH, RESULTING FROM ALL THE BROKEN PIPES.

UH, TRI-COUNTY FORD, UH, DOWN IN MAYBANK.

UH, THE FORD MOTOR COMPANY IS DONATING WATER AND, UH, AND ADDITIONALLY, SOME SPONSORS FOR THE CRANDALL, RACETRACK RPM RACETRACK, UH, THEY, AND THEY ANTICIPATE BRINGING SOME PALLETS OF WATER DOWN HERE AS WELL.

SO I JUST THINK IT'S, UH, WORTH MENTIONING THAT NOT ONLY DO REALLY ALL OUR AGENCIES GO ABOVE AND BEYOND TO DO WHAT IS NECESSARY IN THESE TIMES WITH OUR COMMUNITY REALLY STEPS UP TO, AND I REALLY APPRECIATE IT.

THANK YOU.

DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY CORRESPONDENCE TO SHARE? OKAY, THEN THAT BRINGS US TO THE NEXT ITEM, THE CONSENT AGENDA.

UH, WE HAD THE, UH, A THROUGH D AND, UH, I'LL SAY WE NEED TO ITEM D

[2D. Discuss/Consider accepting the Kaufman County Fire Marshal’s Racial Profiling Report for 2020.]

ACTUALLY NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT OUT TO, UH, BE DISCUSSED AS AN INDIVIDUAL ITEM.

AND THAT IS DISCUSSED.

CONSIDER ACCEPTING THE COUNTY, THE KAUFMAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, UH, OFFICIAL OFFICES, RACIAL PROFILING REPORT FOR 2020 SHERIFF.

THANK YOU, JUDGE COMMISSIONERS.

I'VE JUST HANDED.

Y'ALL A BOOKLET THAT

[00:05:01]

WE PRESENT EVERY YEAR.

YOU KNOW, WE'VE BEEN DOING THIS SINCE 2002, WHEN THE LEGISLATOR AND SENATE BILL 10 74 DID RACIAL PROFILING.

AND IF YOU CAN GO TO THE VERY FIRST PAGE IN THE SUMMARY OF THIS, YOU CAN SEE ALL OUR CONTACTS.

WE HAD OVER 3,114 CONTACTS, WHICH IS 92% OF THE, WHAT WAS REPORTED FROM A CAD REPORT, WHICH IS, UH, NOT REAL HAPPY FOR ME.

I'M NOT HAPPY WITH THAT NUMBER.

I NEED TO STAY WITHIN TWO TO 3%.

SO I HAVE TAKE SOME CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WITH, UH, IN THE DEPARTMENT TO MAKING SURE THAT TRAFFIC CALLS ARE NOT CHANGED, STUFF LIKE THAT.

SO WE'RE DOING A FEW CHANGES.

UH, EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE NO INDICATION OF ANYTHING, YOU CAN SEE THE VARIANCES, UH, BECAUSE ONE THING WE DO WHEN WE COLLECT OUR DATA, WE COLLECT ALL OF IT.

AND THE PROBLEM WE HAVE IS WE'VE GOT INTERSTATE 20, 81, 75 OF PEOPLE THAT TRAVEL THROUGH THAT GETS STOPPED.

SO THE ONLY WAY TO COMPARE AND ANALYZE THE DATA THAT WE'VE DONE EVERY YEAR IS DO IT TO RESIDENTS.

SO WE ALSO BREAK DOWN THE RESIDENTS, WHEREAS YOU CAN SEE THE VARIANCES IN THAT OF COMPARING THE CENSUS DATA TO OUR RESONANCE OF WHAT IT STOPPED.

SO YOU CAN SEE OUR PARENTS, THESE ARE NOT BAD AT ALL.

IT LOOKS REALLY GOOD AND WE SEE NO SIGNS OF RACIAL PROFILING AT ALL.

AND WE HAD NO COMPLAINTS FOR THE LAST YEAR, IF ANYBODY, IN WHICH WE POST ALL OF OUR COMPLAINT, PROCESS EVERYTHING ON OUR WEBSITE.

AND IT'S ALSO ON ALL THE BACK OF THE TICKETS OF HOW TO MAKE A COMPLAINT.

SO THROUGH THE YEAR, IT'S REALLY GOOD.

SO YOU'LL SEE ALL OUR DATA.

YOU ALSO SEE THE COPY OF THE SENATE BILL, YOU'LL SEE OUR POLICY.

THAT'S ALSO MANDATED WITH THE RACIAL PROFILING AND YOU ALSO SEE HOW BIAS POLICY THAT WE HOLD IN OUR DEPARTMENT.

SO OVERALL IT'S, IT'S PRETTY GOOD YEAR, BUT THERE'S SOME CHANGES THAT I WANT TO MAKE BECAUSE I'M NOT HAPPY WITH THE REPORTING NUMBER COMPARED TO CAT.

AND, UH, THAT PROBLEM WILL BE ADDRESSED AND IT'S ALREADY BEEN MET WITH ALL THE STAFF.

SO WE'RE GOING TO MAKE SURE IT'S BETTER.

THIS IS THE FIRST TIME WE'VE BEEN OFF BY MORE THAN 3%.

SO, UH, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AS THE SHERIFF ABOUT HIS RACIAL PROFILING REPORT? UH, IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE REPORT AS PRESENTED? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.

WE HAVE THAT MOTION COMMISSIONER BARBARA, IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND COMMISSIONER IN CAGE DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING I WAS OPPOSED.

NO MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU, SHERIFF.

AND BEFORE I GO ON TO WE, WE NEED TO ADOPT THE REST OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.

I JUST A COUPLE COMMENTS THAT I'VE SKIPPED OVER.

UH, WE HAVE A NUMBER OF FOLKS HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COURT, UH, CONCERNING ONE PARTICULAR ITEM.

AND, AND WE'LL, WE'LL DO THAT WHEN WE GET WE'LL INVITE YOU TO COME UP AND SPEAK WHEN WE GET DOWN TO THAT ITEM.

SO IT WOULD BE FRESH ON EVERYBODY'S MIND.

UM, AND THEN THE OTHER THING WE DO, I, I FAILED TO MENTION, WE DO HAVE A I'M SO USED TO US HAVING A FULL COURT EVERY DAY THAT I'LL NEVER MENTION THIS, BUT WE DO HAVE A QUORUM TODAY.

COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS, UH, IS, UH, YOU SENT ME A NOTE THIS MORNING AND HE'S GOING TO BE RUNNING LATE.

SO BACK TO THE CONSENTED

[CONSENT AGENDA]

CONSENT AGENDA, WE HAVE ITEMS A THROUGH C UH, COMMISSIONERS.

DO YOU ANY OF YOU CARE TO DISCUSSING ANY OF THOSE ITEMS OFF IN DETAIL? IF NOT AS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE, UH, ITEMS A THROUGH C AS PRESENTED, I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION.

WE HAVE EMOTIONAL COMMISSIONER HUNT TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED ACE THROUGH C.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND, SECOND, COMMISSIONER BARBARA DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED NO MOTION CARRIES NEXT UP RIGHT ON SMITH, DISCUSS, CONSIDER PURCHASE

[3. Raylan Smith; Discuss/Consider the purchase / finance of JOHN DEERE 6110M CAB TRACTOR, in the amount of $148,577.08; from Shoppa’s John Deere, utilizing Sourcewell Contract #110719-JDC for Precinct #1.]

FINANCE OF A JOHN DEERE SIX 11 IS 61 10 CAB TRACTOR IN THE AMOUNT OF 148,005 77.

THIS IS FOR PRECINCT ONE.

GOOD MORNING.

GOOD MORNING.

UM, SO THIS WOULD BE THE PURCHASE OR ACTUALLY THE FINANCE OF A CAP TRACTOR FOR PRECINCT ONE.

I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH THE AUDITOR'S OFFICE.

WE HAVE SEVERAL OPTIONS FOR FINANCE OR LEASE.

SO THIS WOULD BE THE TOTAL PRICE AND WE WILL BE USING SOURCE SOURCE, WELD PURCHASING, GO OFF AND WE'LL DISCUSS THE OPTIONS AND WHAT'S GOING TO BE BEST FOR THE COMMISSIONERS BUDGET THAT THE AUDITOR'S OFFICE.

SO FOR YOUR LEASES, THE BEST OPTION.

YEAH.

THAT'S WHAT WE FIGURED IT WOULD BE.

BUT LIKE I SAID, Y'ALL MAKE THE DECISION WHAT'S BEST FOR THE COUNTY AND US, AND THEN WE'LL JUST MOVE FORWARD.

SO BANK CORP CAN CLOSE, BUT NOT CLOSE ENOUGH.

YEAH, IT SOUNDED, IT SOUNDED LIKE A PRETTY SWEET DEAL.

AND, AND I WILL SAY THAT EVEN WITH SOURCE, WELL, I MEAN THE SAME IDENTICAL TRACTOR FROM THE SAME VENDOR, I MEAN, EVERYTHING IDENTICAL USING BUYBOARD VERSUS SOURCE.

WELL, IT WAS LIKE A $15,000 DIFFERENCE.

I MEAN, SOLE SOURCE, WELL, IT'S WORKED OUT REAL WELL FOR US.

AND, UH, SO, BUT ANYWAY, I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE GO AHEAD AND PURCHASE TRACTOR.

I'M GETTING CLOSER AND CLOSER TO REPLACING

[00:10:01]

ALL MY JUNK.

IT'S BEEN FOUR YEARS.

AND THEN, YOU KNOW, SO WE'RE GETTING CLOSE TO HAVING DECENT EQUIPMENT THAT WON'T DIE ON HIM.

SO I CAN MAKE A MOTION WITH THE WIND PARTS MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HUNT TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE HAS PRESENTED ON ITEM THREE.

IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND COMMISSIONER CAGE DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES ITEM FOUR.

[4. Raylan Smith; Discuss/Consider award of contract for RFP 21-02: 2019 KAUFMAN COUNTY ROAD BOND PROGRAM – Construction of the Justice Center and the Kaufman County Pet Adoption Center.]

UH, AGAIN, RAYLAND DISCUSS CONSIDER AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR RFP 21 DASH OH TWO, 2019 KAUFMAN COUNTY ROAD BOND PROGRAM CONSTRUCTION OF THE JUSTICE CENTER AND KAUFMAN COUNTY PET ADOPTION CENTER.

OKAY.

SO WE FINALLY OPENED BIDS FOR THE JUSTICE CENTER AND THE PET ADOPTION FACILITY.

UM, WHAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU RIGHT NOW IS THE LIST OF CONTRACTORS AND THE TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT.

UM, WE ARE STILL IN THE PROCESS OF WORKING WITH THE, UH, ARCHITECTS, AS FAR AS THE VALUE ENGINEERING, THE REQUEST WOULD BE FOR APPROVAL OF THESE CONTRACTS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THAT FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT FOR EACH CONTRACTOR.

UM, THE ESTIMATES BELOW ARE ALL GOING TO BE WITHIN THE GALLAGHER CONTRACT THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED.

UM, AND I DO HAVE GALLAGHER HERE.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, AS FAR AS THE ACTUAL, UM, PROPOSALS THAT WERE RECEIVED WITH THIS WOULD BE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BOTH FACILITIES, THE QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

UH, THEN, UH, UH, BE LOOKING FOR EMOTION TO ACCEPT THOSE, UH, BID PROPOSALS.

UH, AND THAT'S THE TOTAL BEST FOR BOTH THE CONSTRUCTION OF BOTH FACILITIES IN THE AMOUNT OF 39 MILLION, FOUR 78 OH 47.

OF COURSE, THAT HAS TO DO WITH OUR OR FACILITIES BOND PROGRAM.

IS THERE A MOTION I'LL MAKE THE MOTION JUDGE WHERE THE MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER CAGE? IS THERE A SECOND? NO.

SECOND, SECOND COMMISSIONER BARBARA DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE, THOSE OPPOSED NO MOTION CARRIES AND RAVEN AGAIN, RECEIVED

[5. Raylan Smith; Receive construction updates regarding the Kaufman County Justice Center and Kaufman County Pet Adoption Center.]

CONSTRUCTION UPDATES REGARDING THE COFFIN COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER IN PET ADOPTION CENTER.

I THOUGHT WE JUST DID THAT.

WELL, NOW WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO DO IS I'M GOING TO INVITE GALLER GALLAGHER TO COME UP AND JUST KIND OF EXPLAIN TO YOU KIND OF WHAT THE NEXT 30 DAYS LOOKS LIKE.

CAUSE WE WILL START SIGNING CONTRACTS AND THERE WILL BE MOVEMENT ON THE PROPERTY AND HOW WE'RE GOING TO MOVE THE CONTRACTORS ON TO THE FACILITY.

GOOD MORNING, JUDGE.

GOOD MORNING.

SO WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE CONTRACTS TODAY, IT TAKES US ABOUT TWO WEEKS OR SO TO PROCESS ALL THE CONTRACTS, GET INSURANCE BONDS BACK FROM OUR CONTRACTORS.

SO WITHIN ABOUT THE NEXT 30 DAYS, YOU'LL SEE AS MOBILIZING ON SITE, GETTING TEMPORARY FENCE, PUT UP, COORDINATING WITH THE SHERIFF TO MAKE SURE, KEEP HIM IN OPERATION, UH, START PUTTING IN OUR EROSION CONTROL.

ALL THE BMPS REQUIRED IN OUR SWIFT BOOKS ISSUED, AND WE'RE GONNA START MOBILIZING DIRT WORK AND UTILITY GUYS TO START WORKING ON THE ROAD AND A PARKING LOT THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE PRIOR TO GETTING THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION OF THE JUSTICE CENTER, WORKING ON THE PET ADOPTION CLINIC, SAME THING, WE'LL BE PUTTING UP TEMPORARY FENCE AND ALL THE EROSION CONTROL AND START THE DIRT WORK ON THAT PROJECT.

SO THAT'S ABOUT WHAT YOU'LL SEE IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS.

UH, WE ARE PLANNING, UH, AND, UH, I DON'T, I DON'T KNOW IF JERRY IS WORKING WITH YOU OR NOT, BUT JERRY IS, IS IN CHARGE OF, UH, DOING A FORMAL, GROUNDBREAKING TO FORMAL GROUNDBREAKINGS FOR THOSE FACILITIES.

SO, UH, WE'LL BE DOING, WE'RE HOPING TO DO ONE OF THEM IN LATE MARCH AND THEN THE OTHER ONE, A FEW WEEKS LATER IN APRIL, I SAW THE EMAIL THIS MORNING.

SO WE'LL COORDINATE WITH JERRY ON THAT.

ALSO GET EVERYTHING SET UP FOR THAT.

WE WANT TO MAKE IT, UH, UH, THESE ARE IMPORTANT EVENTS FOR THE COUNTY.

WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DO HAVE A REALLY NICE PRESENTATION BY THAT POINT OF THE DATES WE'LL BE MOVING CONSTRUCTION ON HAPPENING.

SO IT WAS GREAT, RIGHT? YES, SIR.

I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THEY, THEY HAVE BEEN GREAT COMMUNICATING WITH US, UH, GOING IN, GOING OUT, ANYTHING CHANGES.

SO THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH OUR OFFICE REALLY, REALLY WELL TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE KEEPING THE OPERATION DAY TO DAY.

SO I WANT TO THANK THEM FOR REACHING OUT TO US EVERY TIME SOMETHING CHANGES OR ANY AVENUES THAT WE NEED TO DO.

SO I APPRECIATE THAT.

THANK YOU, SHERIFF.

I APPRECIATE THAT.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

UH, OKAY, SO THAT'S AN UPDATE.

ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT, WE'RE MOVING ON.

THEN ITEM

[6. Monique Hunter; Discuss/Consider motion to approve replat of lot 22 of the Meadow Ranch Estates. (Part 1 of 2)]

SIX, MONIQUE HUNTER DISCUSS, CONSIDER MOTION TO APPROVE REPLAT OF LOT 22 OR THE METAL RANCH STAGE.

SO WE'LL HEAR YOUR PRESENTATION AND THEN WE'LL HEAR FROM OUR

[00:15:01]

VISITORS.

YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE ITEM.

OKAY.

UM, THIS IS A SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN PRECINCT FOUR OFF COUNTY ROAD, 41, 25 AND 41 26.

IT'S A LOT RIGHT OFF THAT CORNER.

UM, IT WAS A 10 ACRE TRACK TO BEGIN WITH THE DEVELOPER PURCHASED IT AND SUBDIVIDED IT INTO SIX LOTS AND HAS GONE THROUGH THE PROCESS OF THE PLANNING THROUGH THE COUNTIES DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

IT HAS ALL APPROVING AUTHORITIES AND, UM, WE'RE ASKING THE COURT TO APPROVE IT.

OKAY.

UH, PRIOR TO ANY ACTION ON THAT, UM, GOSH, WE HAVE, I HAVE A NUMBER OF FOLKS HERE AS SUBMITTED, UH, A CARD TO SPEAK TO THE COURT.

AND ONE OF THEM, I NOTICED THAT I HAD SOME, OR MAYBE MORE THAN ONE THAT WANTED TO YIELD THEIR MINUTES TO THOMAS MCCAIN.

SO JUST A LITTLE BIT OF, UH, BACKGROUND AND WHAT WE DO NOW IS EVERYONE IS LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES.

IF ONE PERSON IS SPEAKING ON HALF OF OTHERS, THEN THAT PERSON CAN SPEAK FOR UP TO NINE MINUTES.

UH, AND WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU, UM, TRY TO ADHERE TO THAT, TO THAT TIMEFRAME.

AND SO WE'LL S WE'LL START WITH MR. MCCAIN AND THEN ANYONE ELSE THAT CARES TO SPEAK AFTER THAT.

SO, UH, MR. MCCAIN, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME FORWARD? YOU'RE WELCOME.

IF YOU WOULD, UH, GIVE US YOUR, UH, RE GIVE US YOUR NAME AND WHERE YOU LIVE AND ALL THAT STUFF.

ABSOLUTELY.

AND ALSO HAVE SOME DOCUMENTS, UH, TO PASS OUT TO THE COMMISSIONER.

THAT'D BE FINE.

MY NAME IS THOMAS MCCAIN.

UH, THOMAS MCCAIN.

I LIVE AT 1450 COUNTY ROAD, 41, 25 AND SCARY MEN AROUND THE STATES 32 YEARS.

THANK YOU, SIR.

ALL RIGHT.

UH, LET'S SEE, UH, IF YOU'RE COMFORTABLE REMOVING YOUR MASK AT THIS DISTANCE, YOU'RE WELCOME TO THIS VERY MUCH.

I APPRECIATE THAT.

NOT A FAN OF THE MATH.

UM, LIKE I SAID, I'VE LIVED OUT THERE FOR 33 YEARS.

WE MOVED OUT THERE FROM THE CITY AND WITH THE INTENTIONS OF HAVING QUIET COUNTRY LIFE AND, UH, AND NOT BEING ON TOP OF OUR NEIGHBORS AND, UH, IN A SUBDIVISION THAT WAS ADVERTISED AS HAVING 10 ACRE OR MORE TRACKS AND TO NOT BE SOME DIVIDED IN THE FUTURE AND PER THE ORIGINAL DEEDING, IT DOES SAY THERE IS LANGUAGE SAYING THAT THEIR, UH, THE RESTRICTIONS WILL BE IN PLACE FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS, AND THEN THEY WILL, UM, CONTINUE.

AND FOR ANOTHER 10 YEARS, INDEFINITELY PRETTY MUCH IS WHAT IT SAYS.

UM, AND THE LITTLE PACKET I GAVE YOU, THIS WAS THE, UM, ONE OF THE ORIGINAL ADVERTISEMENTS FOR THE METAL RANCHES STATES.

AND IT DOES SHOW PEACEFUL COUNTRY LIVING 10 ACRE TRACKS, QUALITY, BLACKTOP, ROADS, QUALITY WATER LINES, UM, THE ROADS WITH THE POPULATION DENSITY WE HAVE.

NOW, IT'S VERY HARD TO MAINTAIN MR. CATES.

I GOTTA HAND IT TO YOU.

YOU DO A GOOD JOB.

I KNOW IT'S A BIG COUNTY AND ALL Y'ALL DO A GOOD JOB, BUT, UM, I'VE JUST REBUILT THE FRONT END ON MY TRUCK.

AND IT'S BECAUSE OF THE ROADS THERE IT'S, EVERYONE KNOWS THE ISSUES WE HAVE THERE.

UM, BUT THAT WAS THE UNDERSTANDING THAT EVERYONE HAD BUYING OUT THERE WAS THAT THESE TRACKS WERE NOT GOING TO BE SUBDIVIDED.

THE POPULATION DENSITY WAS GOING TO BE THAT ONE FAMILY PER 10 ACRES.

AND NOW WE'RE TRYING TO SUBDIVIDE THAT INTO, UH, BELIEVE IT'S SEVEN LOGS, SIX LOSS PONY.

OKAY.

UM, AND, UH, WHAT WE HAVE NOW, AS WE SAW WITH THE WATER AND EVERYTHING, IT'S HARD TO KEEP WATER TO THE RESIDENTS BECAUSE OF NO FAULT OF THE COUNTIES.

THEY, WE HAD A TRAGIC, UH, DRAMATIC LEAK.

UM, I THINK THEY DID A BANG UP JOB, GETTING EVERYTHING BACK UP AND RUNNING AGAIN, ALL THE HARD WORK THAT WAS DONE.

I APPRECIATE EVERYBODY THAT DID THAT AND ALL THE PEOPLE THAT MADE THE SACRIFICES FOR THAT.

UM, BUT THE INCREASED TRAFFIC AND, UM, POPULATION DENSITY IN THAT SUBDIVISION WILL JUST ADD TO THE PRESSURE ON THE ROADS, THE PRESSURE ON THE UTILITIES AND, UH, FROM

[00:20:01]

THE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT IN THAT PACKET THAT I HANDED YOU ALL, THERE WAS ALSO, UM, SOMETHING SAYING ABOUT THE DISTRICT TO, FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY.

UM, I'LL JUST WONDER MONEY.

HAS THAT BEEN DONE? THE FEASIBILITY, WE SEND THE DEVELOPER TO THE WATER COMPANY PRIOR TO, AND WE GET AN APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE WATER COMPANY IN WEST CEDAR CREEK.

GOOD SIGN OFF ON LETTER.

SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE WATER COMPANY MADE THEM.

DO I JUST GET A LETTER SAYING THEY'VE BEEN APPROVED? OKAY.

WELL, IT DOES SAY IN THE, UM, UM, THE DEED AND EVERYTHING THAT THE DEVELOPER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE.

UM, THE INCREASED COSTS OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY, THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE WATER AND THE UTILITY AND THE, THE INCLUSION OF, UH, WATER HYDRANTS, UH, FIRE HYDRANTS, UM, FOR EACH ADDITIONAL TRACK THAT IS GOING TO BE IN THE, UM, THE REPLANTING.

AND, UH, I BELIEVE I'VE HIGHLIGHTED SOME THINGS ON, THIS IS OUR ORIGINAL DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS FOR METTA RANCHES STATES.

AND, UM, I PUT SOME ASTROCYTES BY SOME OF THE, THE, THE KEY POINTS.

UM, THE FIRST AND FOREMOST IS RESTRICTIONS OF PROPERTY SHALL BE USED FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.

AND, UM, BY REPLANTING, WE'RE TAKING THE 10 ACRES THAT WAS INTENDED AND ADVERTISED ORIGINALLY AS FOR SINGLE FAMILY AND TURNING IT INTO A MULTIPLE FAMILIES.

AND, UH, WHO'S TO SAY, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BRING IN THEIR FAMILIES AS WELL, WHICH HAS HAPPENED ON THE 10 ACRE TRACKS ARE THERE NOW, BUT IT'S ALL FAMILY, THEY'RE NOT SUBLETTING IN ANY MEANS OR FASHION AT ALL.

UM, AND THAT WAS THE END TALKING TO ALL THE RESIDENTS.

I, I SPOKE WITH ALMOST 60 OF THE RESIDENTS OUT THERE IN METTA RANCHES STATES AND GOT DOG BIT TWICE.

AND, UM, BUT THAT'S OKAY.

WE LOVE DOGS.

UM, SO I'VE GOT A LITTLE SKIN IN THE GAME, SO TO SPEAK, UH, EVERYONE MOVED OUT THERE FOR THE SAME REASON BECAUSE OF THE POPULATION DENSITY WAS GOING TO BE LOW.

AND SO THAT WE ALL HAD THE FREEDOM TO ENJOY OUR PEACE AND QUIET.

WELL, OVER THE YEARS, PEOPLE HAVE MOVED MORE FAMILY INTO THEIR, ONTO THEIR PROPERTY, WHICH I'M IN TOTAL AGREEMENT WITH.

I THINK FAMILY COMES FIRST AND THAT'S TOTALLY FINE, BUT NOISE HAS GONE UP.

TRAFFIC HAS GONE UP THE PRESSURE ON THE UTILITIES HAS GONE UP.

AND I THINK BY ADDING EVEN MORE PEOPLE TO THE PLAT, THE SUBDIVISION OF THIS LOT WILL INCREASE THAT EVEN MORE.

AND LIKE I SAID, ONCE THEY MOVE IN WHO SAY, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BRING EVEN MORE PEOPLE IN, WHICH WOULD BE THEIR RIGHT, BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT THIS COMMUNITY WAS STARTED OUT FOR.

BE IT WHAT IT WAS ADVERTISED TO BE AND WHY THE PEOPLE HAVE MOVED OUT HERE.

I SPOKE WITH MANY RESIDENTS THAT HAVE BEEN HERE FOR OVER 30 YEARS.

I, I BEING ONE OF THEM, BUT PEOPLE ARE SAYING, WE'RE GOING TO, WE'RE GOING TO MOVE OUT.

THIS IS NOT WHAT WE MOVED HERE FOR.

WE MOVED HERE FOR THE POPULATION DENSITY AS ADVERTISED, AND WE, WE WANT TO KEEP IT THAT WAY.

WE LOVE OUR NEIGHBORS, ALL OUR NEIGHBORS.

WE DON'T ALWAYS AGREE WITH ALL OUR NEIGHBORS, BUT THAT'S THE BEAUTY OF THE DIFFERENCES THAT WE HAVE IN OUR COMMUNITY.

WE ALL COME TOGETHER WHENEVER NEED BE TO HELP EACH OTHER.

AND, UM, I'LL SAY ONE GOOD THING THAT, THAT HAS COME FROM THIS SUBDIVISION.

THIS RE THE REPLANTING.

I'VE MET ALMOST ALL OF MY NEIGHBORS, EVEN THE ONES MILE AWAY FROM ME WHEN I FOUND OUT THAT METTA RANCHES STATES, WET PLACES WHERE I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW IT WHEN, AND I GOT TO MEET PEOPLE THAT I'D NEVER MET BEFORE, AND EVERYONE IS IN AGREEMENT.

AND AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE PETITION THAT I TOOK AROUND TO THE NEIGHBORS, I HAVE ALMOST 90% OF THE RESIDENTS AND MEDICAL RANCH ESTATES WHO HAVE SIGNED THE PETITION AND WHO ARE AGAINST THE REPLANTING OF THIS LOT, UM, IN THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGE OF R D.

IT SAYS THAT IF 60% OR MORE COME TOGETHER, UM, CAN BE CONSIDERED AN ASSOCIATION AND THEN THEY WILL HAVE THE

[00:25:01]

RIGHT TO VOTE ON ANY REPLANTING, ANY RULES, REGULATIONS, CHANGES, UM, ADMISSIONS, DENIALS, AND WE CLEARLY HAVE A CONSENSUS ON, ON THIS ISSUE.

UM, WHAT AM I FORGETTING? JUST TALKING TO ALL, BUT ALL THE NEIGHBORS AND ALL THE PEOPLE, THEY WERE JUST, UM, OH, ONE OTHER THING.

UM, MONIQUE CAME, UM, 71 LETTERS IS THAT RIGHT? REGISTERED LETTERS, 78, 78, THERE WAS A LOT CERTIFIED LETTERS.

AND THREE WEEKS AGO, WHENEVER I FOUND OUT ABOUT THIS, I'D NEVER HAVE GOTTEN A LETTER TO MY HOUSE.

UM, I TALKED ON THE FIRST EIGHT OR ABOUT 20 RESIDENTS, AND THERE WERE TWO WHO HAD GOTTEN LETTERS AND WITH ALL THE WEATHER THAT WE'VE HAD, AND IT'S BEEN HARD TO GET OUT AND GET ANY SIGNATURES WE'VE BEEN DEALING WITH JUST KEEPING OUR HOMES AFLOAT.

AND, UM, LAST SATURDAY AND SUNDAY, I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO AROUND AND GET THE REMAINING SIGNATURES OF OUR RESIDENTS.

AND, UM, I HAD ALWAYS ASKED EACH ONE, HAVE YOU GOTTEN A LETTER? AND I WOULD SHOW THEM, HAVE YOU GOTTEN THIS? AND THE VAST MAJORITY HAVE NOT.

SO THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO AWARENESS THAT THIS WAS EVEN TAKING PLACE.

AND ON A SIDE NOTE, I BELIEVE LAST YEAR, THE FIRST EDITION THAT HAPPENS.

WHEN WAS THAT, UM, FOR SHARING LAST YEAR, LAST YEAR, I NEVER GOT A LETTER ABOUT THAT, OR I'D BEEN UP HERE FOR THAT.

AND THEY DID A REPLANTING APPARENTLY THAT I HAD NO IDEA ABOUT.

SO, UM, UH, MR. MCCAIN, YOU'RE ABOUT LITTLE OVER A MINUTE OVER THE 9%.

WE DON'T WANT TO CUT YOU OFF, BUT IF YOU COULD GRAB YES, SIR.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I APPRECIATE THE, UM, UM, THE EXTRA TIME, UH, I PRETTY MUCH SAID IT ALL.

YEAH.

WE HAVE A, A GENERAL CONSENSUS OF 90% OF THE RESIDENTS AND THE RANCHES STATES THAT THEY DON'T WANT MORE PRESSURE IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS AND INCREASED PRESSURE ON THE UTILITIES, THE ROADS AND EVERYTHING.

THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE EXTRA TIME AND FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION, MAKING SURE.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

UM, SO LET ME SORT THROUGH THESE AND MAKE SURE I DON'T.

SO I HAD A, OKAY.

I CAN'T QUITE READ THE RADIO IS THAT, UM, LANITA WOODDALE IS YIELD OF YOUR TIME.

I SEE.

UM, AND, UH, JEREMY WADDELL, UH, YIELD OF HIS TIME.

AND NOW I HAVE, UH, BENNY HILLIS.

IS THAT RIGHT? YES, SIR.

WOULD YOU CARE TO SPEAK MR. ELLIS? SORRY.

I WAS SETTING MY TIMER.

I'M NOT SURE WHAT I NEED TO SAY.

UH, I M MORE DIRECTLY, UH, BOTHERED, BOTHERED SUBDIVISION BY THE REPLANT BECAUSE I AM THE NEXT LOT NEXT TO HIM.

WHEN WE BOUGHT THE PLACE IN 91, IT WAS 10 ACRES LIKE MR. MCCANN SAID, AND THEN IN PHASE TWO, THEY PUT SIX OR SEVEN LOTS THERE.

NOW THEY'RE TRYING TO PUT SIX MORE ADJACENT TO MY PROPERTY.

UH, LIKE HE WAS SAYING IN THE ROAD THROUGH ALL THE TRAFFIC AND ALL OF THAT, WHICH I KNOW MR. KATE'S BEEN DOING THE WORK SINCE WE'VE BEEN OUT THERE.

IT'S PROBABLY BEEN REDONE THREE TIMES OR MAYBE FOUR, BUT I'M AGAINST THE REPLAT OTHER SUBDIVISION.

HE HAS AN AMOUNT OF PEOPLE THAT WILL BE COMING AT SIX MORE FAMILIES, AT LEAST.

SO THAT'S ALL I'LL HAVE TO SAY.

THANK YOU, SIR.

AND THEN I HAVE A TAMRA SCOTT.

GOOD MORNING.

[00:30:01]

IF YOU'D JUST GIVE US YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS, PLEASE.

TIMUR SCOTT, 6,104 COUNTY ROAD, 41, 27 SCURRY.

I WAS HERE LAST YEAR.

Y'ALL PROBABLY REMEMBER ME NOW.

I KNOW WHY I DIDN'T HAVE SO MUCH SUPPORT BECAUSE NO ONE RECEIVED THE LETTERS.

WE ARE ALL AGAINST IT, WHICH YOU'LL KNOW THAT THE WATER COMPANY TRIED TO STOP THE DIVISION FROM DEVELOPING.

BUT I HAD SOME LOOP POSTS THAT GOT BY.

I HAVE A FEW PICTURES THAT I WOULD LIKE YOU TO SEE FROM WHAT YOU PASSED LAST YEAR.

SO I'M GOING TO GIVE THEM TO YOU DIRECTLY, OKAY.

ARE NOT BUILDING 50 FEET OFF THE FENCE LINE.

NUMBER ONE, BECAUSE THE ONE I GREW LOTS WILL NOT ALLOW THAT THERE'S NOT ENOUGH ROOM.

THEY ARE NOT, UH, PROVIDING A DRIVEWAY, WHICH IN OUR, IT SAYS THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE A DRIVEWAY AND MAINTAIN IT BECAUSE THERE IS NO PARKING ON THE STREET.

THEY HAVE NOT PUT ROCKY IN TO GET DRIVEWAYS.

THEREFORE THEY'RE PARKING ON THE STREET.

SOME OF OUR STREETS ARE ONE CAR STREETS ANYWAY, BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T BEEN MAINTAINED.

THEREFORE, WHEN SOMEONE PARKS ON IT, YOU CAN'T GO BY ALSO TALKED TO YOU ABOUT ALL THE DOGS.

THERE'S A PICTURE OF THEIR DOGS SITTING IN THE STREET BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE YARDS TO PUT THEM IN.

WE DON'T NEED MORE OF THIS TO CONTINUE.

ONE THING I WANT YOU TO ADDRESS AND TAKE CARE OF IS ONE OF THE PITCHERS.

HE PUT HIS DRIVEWAY COLBERT ON TOP OF THE COLBERT UNDER THE COUNTY ROAD.

NOW, WHEN IT RAINS, IT CAN'T GO THROUGH THE COPER BECAUSE OF HIS DRIVEWAY.

SO NOT FLOODS.

THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD.

IT GOES ACROSS THE ROAD AND IT'S GOING TO TEAR OUR ROADS UP.

WE NEED SOMEONE TO TAKE CARE OF THAT PROBLEM.

THE PAGE ONE IS 50 FEET.

NOT OFF THE FENCE.

PAGE TWO IS 50 FEET.

NOT OFF THE FENCE.

PAGE THREE IS A DIFFERENT PICTURE.

I COULDN'T QUITE GET TO IT.

PAGE FOUR IS HIS DRIVEWAY ON TOP OF THE COLBERT THAT RUNS UNDER THE COUNTY ROAD.

UH, PAGE SIX IS PAGE FIVE.

THEY DON'T HAVE A DRIVEWAY.

THEY'RE STUCK RIGHT NOW.

I WATCHED THEM FOR 30 MINUTES TRYING TO GET THE SECOND TRUCK OUT BECAUSE I CAN'T DRIVE.

AND APPARENTLY THEY DON'T WANT TO PUT IN ROCK OR CAN'T AFFORD IT.

I DON'T KNOW THE, UH, THE PICTURE THERE WITH THE FRAME STRUCTURE.

IS THAT, IS THAT HOUSE OR IS IT A BARN OR WHATEVER? YUMMY.

NO, IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE A HOUSE.

OKAY.

IT'S THEIR BUILDING OF, YEAH, THAT'S A LITTLE DISTURBING.

ISN'T IT? YEP.

OKAY.

PAGE SIX IS HE CAN'T PULL IN HIS DRIVEWAY.

HE'S PARKED AND THEY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH ROOM THERE.

TAILGATED THEIR TRUCK IS IN THE STREET.

IT'S PAST THEIR MAILBOX BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE, NOW I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST THE OTHER GUY THAT'S BOUGHT THIS.

I DON'T KNOW WHO HE IS, MR. WILLIAMS OR SOMETHING.

BUT MANNY STOOD HERE IN COURT AND LIED TO EVERYONE IN HERE.

WE WILL PROVIDE ALL THESE RULES.

WE'RE ONLY REPLOTTING.

WE ARE NOT.

BUT WHAT I UNDERSTAND ALL THIS LAND IS STILL IN MANNY'S NAME.

SO HE'S THE ONE THAT WE NEED TO CORRECT THIS AND TAKE CARE OF IT.

GREAT.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS.

OKAY.

UH, I DON'T HAVE ANY MORE CARDS.

UM, SO BACK TO YOU, MONIQUE, UH, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD OR DOES ANYBODY WELL WE'LL HAVE A OR DISCUSSION OR COMMENTS FROM ANYBODY.

WE NEED TO ADD SOMETHING TO THIS.

UM, AS FOR THE MAILING OF THE LETTERS, THE CODE SAYS THAT WE NEED TO GO OFF THE APPRAISAL ROLES.

AND SO THE, UM, DEVELOPER, UM, GOES WITH THE APPRAISAL, ADDRESSES, PROVIDES US THE LIST, AND THEN WE MAIL THOSE OUT VIA CERTIFIED $6 PER LETTER GOES OUT DURING COVID.

THE POST OFFICE WAS NOT GETTING PEOPLE TO SIGN THEM, BUT WE HAVE RECEIVED GREEN CARDS BACK FROM THE POST OFFICE.

SO UNFORTUNATELY, ONCE THEY GO OUT, WE DON'T HAVE ANY RECOURSE ON WHETHER OR NOT THE POST OFFICE DOES WHAT THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO.

BUT WE DO GO OFF THE CERTIFIED ROLES.

WE MAILED OUT 76 BASED OFF OF THAT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE LETTERS.

SO WHAT WOULD YOU SAY YOUR PERCENTAGE OF RETURN? HOW MANY DID WE GET BACK? WE GOT IT.

THE LITTLE STACK.

SO SOMEBODY GOT THE LETTER.

I DON'T KNOW IF THEY WENT CAUSE OFF THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT.

IF THEIR ADDRESS IS NOT CORRECT WITH THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT, THEN I CAN'T, IT GOES TO THE WHOEVER'S ON THE APPRAISAL ROLE FOR THAT PROPERTY.

SO THAT'S HOW THE LETTERS, IT COULD GO SOMEWHERE ELSE IF THEY, IF THEY OWN THAT LOT, BUT THEY DON'T LIVE THERE.

AND THE APPRAISAL ROLE HAS IT, THAT THEIR ADDRESS IS IN GARLAND.

IT'S GOING

[00:35:01]

TO GO TO THE GARLAND ADDRESS BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT HAS LISTED AS THEIR MAILING ADDRESS.

SO WE HAVE TO GO BY IT.

THAT'S THE CODE, CORRECT? CORRECT.

DID ANYBODY WHO LIVES OUT THERE GET A LETTER THIS TIME? SO A FEW PEOPLE GOT LETTER.

OKAY.

I DID NOT GET A LETTER FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE 1983.

THIS IS THE FIRST TIME.

AND TWO LETTERS WERE SENT OUT LAST YEAR.

NOT ONE, TWO, NONE OF THESE PEOPLE GOT THEM.

IT'S SAFE LIKE THAT.

AFTER I SPOKE WITH YOU, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WENT TO THE POST OFFICE AND ASK THEM THE VATICAN.

REMEMBER I TOLD YOU THAT NO ONE WAS GETTING THE LETTERS.

IT SEEMED LIKE THEY STARTED DATING.

I THOUGHT MAYBE YOU DON'T NEED YOUR POST OFFICE.

AND THAT INQUIRED ABOUT IT.

I REACHED OUT TO THEM WITH NOT A LOT OF RESPONSE BACK, BASICALLY, BASICALLY, BASICALLY STAY IN YOUR LANE.

SO WE USE THE ONE IN COCKNEY.

CAN, CAN I ASK A QUESTION? I MEAN, IS THIS ARE MOST OF THE FINANCING HERE THAT WARRANTY DEEDS, I'M SORRY, THERE'S A LOT OF THIS WARRANTY.

DEEDS.

SOME OF THEM ARE WARRANTY DEED.

SOME ARE CONTRACT FOR DEEDS.

IT JUST DEPENDS.

SO THEY WOULD GO TO THE PERSON THAT ACTUALLY IS SELLING THE PROPERTY INSTEAD OF THE PERSON THAT LIVES THERE.

RIGHT? WELL, NOT NECESSARILY BECAUSE WE ARE MAKING THE CONTRACT FOR DEEDS, BE RECORDED.

THAT'S IN THE PROPERTY CODE.

THEY HAVE TO RECORD THAT CONTRACT FOR DEED IN THE PAST, NOT TO RECORD IT.

IN FACT, WE FOUND SOME LANGUAGE WHERE IT SAID, DO NOT RECORD THIS.

AND WE CAUGHT THEM AND WE PRESENTED THE PROPERTY CODE TO THEM WHERE THEY HAVE TO RECORD THAT CONTRACT FOR DEED.

SO IF IT'S RECORDED IN THE PRICERS WOULD HAVE THE, BUT IN THOSE CONTRACT FOR DEEDS, THE TAXES ARE RESPONSIBLE BY THE PERSON OF THE PROPERTY.

AND SO ONCE THEY PAY THEIR TAXES THE FIRST YEAR, THAT'S WHAT THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT HAS IS AN ADDRESS.

SO THEY ARE INDIVIDUAL OWNERS.

OKAY.

SO ANY, SO ANY CONTRACT FOR DEED ADDRESS IS GOING TO BE THE, THE LESS OR RIGHT.

IT'S GOING TO BE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.

THAT'S THAT'S THAT'S THAT I GUESS IS THE ORIGINAL IS STILL THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.

IF IT'S A CONTRACT FOR DEED, NO, THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT, ONCE THEY RECORD THEIR CONTRACT FOR DEED, AND THEN THEY PAY THEIR TAXES THAT FIRST YEAR, THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT WILL HAVE THE PERSON THAT PAID THOSE TAXES AS THE OWNER.

OKAY.

RIGHT.

WE HAVE THESE A LOT.

IT'S LIKE THIS PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION, THERE ARE THESE LOTS OF PRE-SOLD.

IS THAT WHAT WE'RE SAYING? OR SO FAR, THESE ARE JUST, THIS IS JUST THE, THE REQUEST TO REPLANT.

SO, SO THESE PARTICULAR LOTS THAT WE'RE CONCERNED WITH TODAY HAVE NOT TRANSFERRED.

WELL, THEY CANNOT SELL IT OR TRANSFERRED IT, THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORD UNTIL THE PLANT IS RUNNING.

RIGHT.

SO, SO I WANT TO BUY IT.

THE DEVELOPER IS STILL THE OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY AS OF TODAY, AS OF TODAY.

YEAH.

RIGHT.

AND IF THEY, IF THEY, IF HE CARRIES THE NOTE AND THAT'S WHY YOU WERE SEEING CONTRACTS, THEY DON'T RECORD IT.

BUT WHEN YOU RECORDED, THE DEED KNEW IF I OWN A PIECE OF PROPERTY, I SELL IT TO SOMEBODY AND I GIVE THEM A CONTRACT AND I'M COLLECTING THE MONEY.

THEN YOU CAN RECORD IT.

AND THEY'RE ACTUALLY THE OWNER, I'M THIS, THE ACTUALLY THE LIEN HOLDER OR THE MORTGAGE COMPANY.

AND THAT'S WHY THEY DON'T WANT THEM TO CONTRACT.

THEY DON'T WANT THEM TO DO THAT BECAUSE THEY COME AND REPOSSESS THEM OVERNIGHT.

BASICALLY, IF THEY DON'T MAKE PAYMENTS.

WELL, EVEN THOUGH VETERAN LAND BOARD, THEY DO CONTRACTS FOR, FOR D D YOU DON'T GET THE DEED UNTIL YOU PAY THAT ONBOARD PROCESS.

IT'S NOT AS, YOU KNOW, THE VETERAN, LANDLORD'S A LOT BETTER AT HANDLING THAT THAN MAYBE SOME OF THEM.

YEAH.

YEAH, YEAH.

YEAH.

SO I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT HASTE.

HE MENTIONED SOMETHING AND I DON'T KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT THEIR VOTING RIGHTS.

THEY HAD SOMETHING IN THE CONTRACTS, SIR.

WE, WE KNOW ABOUT THAT.

I MEAN, THE WE'VE, SEND THE PACKET THAT I AM.

I CAN'T READ IT.

OKAY.

DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY, HAVE YOU VOTED A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION OUT THERE? I'VE BEEN GOING, YEAH, I HAVE NOT, BUT WE'RE GOING TO, APPARENTLY WE NEED TO, WE GOT 90% OF THE RESIDENTS WHO ARE WILLING TO VOTE AND WANT TO KNOW ABOUT IT, CREATE A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, BECAUSE I ALSO ASKED THE RESIDENTS IN MY TRAVELS BE OPPOSED TO, OR IN FAVOR OF A CHANGE AWAY UNANIMOUSLY AGREED.

OKAY.

SO, UH, OKAY.

THE WAY I READ THIS, LET ME, LET ME JUST SHARE IT, BUT JUST A SECOND.

SO IF I KNOW THAT, UH, THE COUNTY CLERK OVER THERE IS GONNA IS SHOOTING ME.

I, I BOUGHT DARK DARKS BECAUSE WE'VE GOT PEOPLE SPEAKING THAT ARE NOT BEING PICKED UP AT THE MICROPHONE.

[00:40:01]

SO IF WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE THIS DIALOGUE, IF ANYONE'S GOING TO SAY, AND THIS REALLY ISN'T INTENDED TO BE AN OPEN FORUM, BUT, UH, GO AHEAD.

SO THE WAY AND CARE, MAYBE YOU CAN LOOK AT THIS AS WELL.

THE WAY I READ THAT SECTION, IT'S IT ESSENTIALLY SAYS THAT ABSENT OF A VOTED AND APPROVED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, THAT THE, THAT THE ORIGINAL COVENANTS WILL CONTINUE IN SUCCESS OF TEN-YEAR PERIODS, UNLESS YOU GUYS VOTE TO CHANGE THEM.

SO, SO FAR THAT HASN'T HAPPENED.

OKAY.

SO THE ORIGINAL COVENANTS AS WRITTEN ARE STILL IN EFFECT.

OKAY.

THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT.

ONE THING THAT WE NEED TO BE AWARE OF IS THAT, AND IF, AND IF THERE'S A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION OR THERE'S A DIFFERENCE IN THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE, THERE ARE NO, UM, THERE ARE NO RESTRICTIONS ON REPLANTING THOUGH.

THE WHAT THE DEED AND THE DOCUMENTS THAT GO WITH THE SUBDIVISION STATE IS THAT THERE TO BE REPLANTED OR RE SUB YOU KNOW, SUBDIVISION CHANGES PER THE KAUFMAN COUNTY REGULATIONS.

SO THAT'S WHERE THERE'S KIND OF A HARD, DIFFICULT POSITION BECAUSE THERE'S NOT A RESTRICTION ON REPLANTING.

YEAH.

YEAH.

I THINK WE SHOULD, LET ME READ THAT INTO THE RECORD, CHERYL, THIS WAS, THIS WAS, UH, OUT OF ARTICLE TWO OF YOUR GENERAL RESTRICTIONS.

IT'S A PARAGRAPH ONE B SUB B.

IT SAYS REPLANTING OR SUBDIVIDING PROPERTY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF KAUFMAN COUNTY.

AND ALL THE RESTRICTIONS HERE IN SHALL APPLY TO EACH LOT RESULTING FROM THE SUBDIVISION IN THE SAME MANNER AS APPLICABLE TO LOTS.

SO EVEN YOUR ORIGINAL COVENANTS DID PROVIDE A MECHANISM FOR REPLANTING AND, AND, UH, SUBDIVIDING.

AND, AND THAT WAS POINTING MY QUESTION.

YOU HAVE NOT, YOU GUYS HAVE NOT, UH, UM, ESTABLISHED A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND THEN VOTED TO CHANGE ANY OF THESE DEED RESTRICTIONS.

YET YOU WILL, YOU'LL HAVE TO COME TO THE OUTCOME OF THE, SO, BECAUSE WE'RE, THIS IS BROADCAST AND RECORDED.

SO WE'D LIKE TO HAVE THAT.

UH, THANK YOU.

YES.

AND, UM, THAT'S WHY I GAVE YOU THE, BECAUSE I DID SEE THAT AND IT IS TRUE.

ABSOLUTELY.

UM, THEY CAN BE REPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH KAUFMAN COUNTY.

UM, HAD WE KNOWN THAT WE NEEDED TO DO THIS, HAD WE ALL GOTTEN PRIOR NOTIFICATION LAST YEAR THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN DONE BY NOW, JUST BY SEEING ALL OF THE SIGNATURES, 90% OF THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE OPPOSED TO THIS, AND THAT WOULD FORM AN HOA AND WE WILL FORM AN HOA.

UM, IT MAY BE TOO LATE NOW FOR THIS REPLANTING.

HOPEFULLY IT'S NOT, YOU'LL GIVE US AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET A HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION CAUSE WE DEFINITELY HAVE THE, THE NUMBERS TO DO SO.

OKAY.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

THANK YOU.

AND I WILL SAY THAT WHEN WE SEND OUT THE LETTERS IT'S TO, UM, FOR THAT FACE.

SO IF YOU ARE IN PHASE ONE OF MEADOW RANCH, AND THE LOT DIVISION IS OCCURRING IN PHASE TWO, THEN THE LETTERS GO TO WHOEVER RESIDES IN PHASE TWO, BECAUSE IS, IS CHANGING THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORD ON FILE IT'S TO LET THEM KNOW THAT THE PLAT THAT THEY HAVE HAS BEEN AMENDED.

SO IF YOU'RE IN PHASE ONE, YOU'RE NOT GETTING THOSE LETTERS.

YOU HAVE TO RESIDE IN THE PHASE IN WHICH THE DEVELOPMENT IS OCCURRING.

CORRECT.

SO IT MIGHT NOT NECESSARILY, EVERY LETTER MIGHT NOT GO TO EVERY RESIDENT, RIGHT? SO IF YOU'RE ACROSS THE STREET FROM THEM, BUT YOU'RE IN PHASE ONE, GOT IT.

RIGHT.

SO, AND WE ALSO MAKE ALL DEVELOPERS, UM, ON TOP OF THE LIGHT DEED RESTRICTIONS THAT WE SEARCHED IN THE COUNTY RECORDS, BECAUSE WE'RE NOT OFFICIAL TITLE SEARCHERS.

WE ALSO MAKE THE DEVELOPERS SIGN, UM, A, UH, NOTARIZE, A DOCUMENT THAT SAYS THEY GOT LEGAL AND TITLE COMPANIES TO REVIEW TO MAKE SURE THERE WERE NO RESTRICTIONS PRIOR TO MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS, BECAUSE I'M NOT A PROFESSIONAL TITLE SEARCHER.

I DON'T HOLD THAT DEGREE.

SO THEY HAVE TO ACTUALLY GET THAT INTERPRETATION, GET IT NOTARIZED AND TURN IT INTO US BEFORE WE'LL MOVE FORWARD.

NOW I WILL COMMENT ON THE DEED RESTRICTIONS.

IF THEY ARE DOING SOMETHING OUT THERE THAT GOES AGAINST YOUR DEED RESTRICTIONS, THEN THAT IS CIVIL SUIT.

THE HOMEOWNER MUST ADDRESS THAT AND PRODUCE THEIR REGS.

EITHER HIRE AN ATTORNEY, FILE SOMETHING, BUT THAT'S A CIVIL SUIT.

THE COUNTY DOESN'T GET INVOLVED IN ENFORCING DEED RESTRICTIONS.

SO IF YOU SEE SOMETHING OUT THERE THAT'S GOING ON, OR IF YOU SEE THAT THERE'S NO COVERT, UM, I WILL SAY THAT ON THE WEBSITE, IF YOU SEE A CULVER VIOLATION OR THAT TYPE, I HAVE IT FILLABLE DOCUMENT, OR YOU CAN SEND THAT TO US AND WE'LL SEND SOMEBODY OUT THERE.

[00:45:01]

SO THAT IS AVAILABLE ONLINE AT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CULVERTS, SEPTIC, OR SUBDIVISION ILLEGALLY HAPPENING.

YOU CAN, IT'S ANONYMOUS.

YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE TO PUT YOUR NAME, BUT YOU CAN LET US KNOW BECAUSE THE COUNTY IS VERY LARGE.

AND IN ORDER TO TRACK ALL THIS DOWN, WE'RE GOING TO NEED THE CITIZENS TO TELL US SOMETHING'S WRONG.

SO WE HAVE PUT THAT IN PLACE.

UM, OKAY.

WELL I THINK, UH, WHAT I WOULD DO, AND THIS IS A COMBINATION QUESTION TO, TO YOU AND MAYBE SUPPORT WITH KAREN, WHAT ARE OUR OPTIONS AS A COMMISSIONER'S COURT RIGHT NOW? WELL, BASICALLY WHENEVER THERE'S A SUBDIVISION PLAT THAT'S BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURT, IF THAT PLAT MEETS THE COUNTY REQUIREMENTS, THEN IT'S REALLY A MINISTERIAL ACTION WHERE IT SHOULD BE APPROVED.

AND WE HAVE A CERTAIN NUMBER OF DAYS TO DO THAT.

I BELIEVE IT'S 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE THAT THE FINAL DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT DATE THEY WERE SUBMITTED.

AND THE REASON I'M SAYING THAT IS SOMETIMES THAT 30 DAY PERIOD CAN GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF TIME IF YOU WANTED TO TABLE IT.

BUT, UM, IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION IF BY THE COURT AND APPROVING IT.

IF ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET BY THE, BY THE, UM, PERSON THAT'S SUBMITTING THE REPLAT OR PLAT, WE KNOW THE SUBMISSION DATE, UH, WE DO BECAUSE IT WAS PUT ON OUR CERTIFIED LETTER.

AND BECAUSE OF THE WAY THE REPLAT IS WE'RE AT THE END OF OUR 30 DAYS, BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO POST IT IN THE PAPER.

SO IF YOU EITHER HAVE TO DENY, DENY IT AND, AND IT NEEDS TO BE DENIED WITH, WITH, UH, FOR A REASON, A VALID REASON THAT BASICALLY MEANING IT DOESN'T MEET SOME OF THE REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY, BUT NORMALLY MONIQUE DOES NOT BRING SOMETHING BEFORE THE COURT, IF THOSE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT, ARE NOT MET.

SO, SO LET ME, LET ME ASK THE SPECIFIC COUPLE OF SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, UNFORTUNATELY, YOU KNOW, THE COUNTY, WE HAVE TO LIVE WITHIN THE LAW AND WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF OUR AUTHORITY.

SO BASED ON, AND I THINK I ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER, BUT I'M GOING TO ASK IT FOR THE RECORD.

SO, SO OUR FIRE MARSHALL HAS REVIEWED THIS AND FIND IT AND FINDS IT TO BE IN COMPLIANCE.

IF YOU CONCUR WITH THAT FIRE, MARSHALL ARE OUR ON-SITE, UH, SANITATION, UH, HAS BEEN EXAMINED AND, AND, UH, CERTIFIED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE.

YES, THEY ARE 1.6 ACRE TRACKS.

SO MORE SUITABLE FOR AN AEROBIC SYSTEM.

AND, UH, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THIS NOW, WHICH IS THE FIRST I'VE HEARD OF A POTENTIALLY, AND IT'S NOT EVEN REALLY IN, IN THIS, UH, REPLANTING, BUT WITH THE EXCEPTION OF, UH, ONE POTENTIAL KOHLER VIOLATION THAT EXISTS IN THE SUBDIVISION.

UH, SO FAR WE HAVE NO, NO CULVERT OR DRAINAGE VIOLATIONS THAT ARE APPARENT IN ANY OF THIS.

SO, AND, UM, AND I MIGHT ADD IF IT'S OKAY THAT, UM, WITHIN THE 30 DAYS, IF WE DON'T, UM, MAKE A DECISION TO COURT, THEN IT'S AUTOMATICALLY APPROVED BY RULE OF LAW BECAUSE THE 30 DAYS EXPIRED WITHOUT THE COURT TAKING ACTION.

LET ME ASK SOMETHING TOO.

UM, I KNOW WHEN THE DEVELOPERS BRING THIS, UH, TO YOU ON A, IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT ALONG THE WAY THERE, THAT DOESN'T PASS, WHATEVER THEY HAVE AN APPEAL PROCESS AND ALL THAT, IF IT GETS DENIED BEFORE IT EVEN GETS THIS FAR, IS THAT CORRECT? YES.

WE W WHAT WE DO IS, UM, WE DO A PRE-DEVELOPMENT START OFF WITH, AND THEN WE DO OUR RESEARCH.

WE NEED TO FIND OUT IF THERE'S A FLOOD PLAIN ON THAT PROPERTY, IF IT'S LARGE ENOUGH FOR AN ONSITE SEWAGE, WHETHER IT EVEN SITS IN OUR JURISDICTION, ONCE THAT PRE-DEVELOPMENT QUESTIONNAIRE IS REVIEWED, THEN WE SET UP A MEETING.

IF IT'S GOING TO GO TO THE PLANNING.

AND THEN DURING THAT TIME, WE GIVE THEM A CHECKLIST THAT'S REQUIRED FROM OUR REGS, AND THEY MUST OBTAIN ALL OF THOSE THINGS.

IF THEY CAN OBTAIN IT, YOU'RE NOT EVEN GOING TO GET YOUR TOTAL FORMAL SUBMISSION.

SO YOU NEVER MAKE IT PAST THAT POINT.

WELL, WHEN HE COMES HERE, I'VE GATHERED ALL THAT ALREADY SEEMS TO BE HAPPENING MORE AND MORE.

I MEAN, IT'S HAPPENING TO ME, YOU KNOW, WHERE I LIVE.

UH, SO YEAH, I'M GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT BIASED ABOUT THIS, BUT, UH, IT JUST SEEMS TO ME THAT THE DEVELOPERS HAVE ALL THE RIGHTS AND THE EXISTING RESIDENTS HAVE NONE.

THAT'S WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE IS HAPPENING HERE.

WE HAVE GOT TO DO SOMETHING TO CHANGE THIS, AND I THINK, UH, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER THE LEGAL SIDE OF THIS HAS OR WHATEVER, BUT, UH, IF NOTHING ELSE, I THINK THESE FOLKS NEED MORE TIME TO GET THINGS TOGETHER ON THEIR END, BECAUSE THEY'RE OBVIOUSLY OPPOSED TO THIS IT'S WITHIN THEIR SUBDIVISION FROM WHERE IT SOUNDS TO ME, IT'S NOT LIKE A SEPARATE PIECE OF PROPERTY, IS IT, ISN'T IT WITHIN THAT SUBDIVISION WHERE THE 10 ACRE TRACK WITHIN THAT

[00:50:01]

DEVELOPMENT THERE, THAT IF THIS GOES THROUGH, THEN THEY'LL BUY THE NEXT SLOT AND SPLIT IT UP.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT COULD, COULD HAPPEN TO ME AS A VOTING MEMBER OF THIS BODY, BUT I CAN'T VOTE TO APPROVE THIS.

I JUST CAN'T DO IT WELL, SOMETHING'S GOTTA BE DONE TO CHANGE THIS.

AND DEVELOPERS HAVE ALL THE RIGHTS AND THE RESIDENTS HAVE NOT, AND I'M, I'M TIRED OF SEEING IT.

SO AS FAR AS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE AND THE LAW THAT AFFECTS THE COUNTY, IT'S STILL IS EXACTLY LIKE WE SAID, WHERE WITHIN 30 DAYS, UM, IF THE COURT DOESN'T MAKE A RULING, MEANING APPROVAL OR DENIAL, THEN, UM, IT'S AUTOMATICALLY APPROVED BY RULE OF LAW.

IF THE COURT DENIES IT AND DENIES IT FOR SOMETHING THAT IS NOT A VALID REASON, THEN YOU KNOW, THE LIABILITY IS THAT THE COUNTY CAN POSSIBLY BE MANDAMUS OR, OR ARE SUED FOR FAILURE TO APPROVE.

UM, A PLAT THAT MEETS THE REGULATIONS ARE KAUFMAN COUNTY LAND USE REGULATIONS, WHICH INCLUDES OUR SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS.

WE FOLLOW THE LAW, WHICH IS A LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.

AND SO A LOT OF THESE CHANGES, UM, THAT PEOPLE MAY WANT TO MAKE.

IT'S REALLY A LEGISLATIVE ISSUE.

IT'S, IT'S NOT THE COUNTY INTERPRETING THE LAW DIFFERENTLY, OR APPLYING THE LAW DIFFERENTLY.

THE LAW IS PRETTY BLACK AND WHITE.

IT IS WHAT IT IS, SO TO SPEAK.

AND SO THOSE BECOME LEGISLATIVE ISSUES REALLY, RIGHT.

I DON'T CARE IF YOU, IF YOU LIVE IN AN HOA, YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW THE, LET ME, SO LET ME JUST ASK A SUMMARY QUESTION IN YOUR CONSIDERED OPINION.

IS THERE A LAWFUL BASIS TO DENY THIS PLAN? NOT THAT I HAVE HEARD TODAY, UM, I'M SYMPATHETIC WITH THE LANDOWNERS AND I, BUT AS THE LAWYER FOR THE COUNTY, UM, I DON'T, I HAVE NOT HEARD A LEGAL REASON TO DENY THE PLAT TODAY.

UM, YOU KNOW, THERE'S ALWAYS OPTIONS.

THERE'S WHEN YOU'RE DEALING WITH PEOPLE OR COMPANIES OR DEVELOPERS, MOST FOLKS WANT TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS.

AND SO THERE ARE ALWAYS OPTIONS.

I'M A BELIEVER IN MEETING WITH PEOPLE TRYING TO WORK OUT OF THE DEVELOPER AND THE CITIZENS WOULD BE WILLING TO MEET AND WORK OUT SOMETHING THAT IS HELPFUL OR AGREEING ON AN EXTENSION OF TIME.

I THINK THERE ARE ALWAYS OPTIONS.

SO I DON'T WANT TO, YOU KNOW, THAT THOSE ARE POLICY DECISIONS THAT THE COURT WOULD HAVE TO MAKE DEVELOPER REPRESENTATIVE HERE.

YES.

JONATHAN WILLIAMS IS THE DEVELOPER.

JONATHAN, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME UP FRONT? UM, NOT REALLY SURE HOW OFFICIALLY FORMAL THIS IS, BUT I THINK YOU'VE HEARD A LOT OF OBJECTION TO DAD.

JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO, UH, OR QUESTIONING IF YOU'D BE WILLING TO MEET WITH THESE RESIDENTS, UH, TO GIVE US SOME, UH, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'D AGREE TO AN EXTENSION OF THE STATUTORY TIME FOR RE APPROVAL OF THIS PLAT, AND PERHAPS AFFORDS YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH THE, THE RESIDENTS AND THE POTENTIAL HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OUT THERE, AND SEE IF YOU GUYS COULD, COULD COME TO A NEGOTIATED, UH, YOU KNOW, MUTUALLY AGREEABLE SETTLEMENT OUT THERE.

SO THE BIGGEST PROBLEM WITH THAT RIGHT NOW IS I'VE GOT A 50% PARTNER.

THAT'S NOT HERE, HE'S, HE'S OUT OF TOWN.

SO HAVING HIM IN ON BOARD WITH THAT, IT'S SOMETHING THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO BE A PART OF.

UM, W WE DEFINITELY HAVE LIKE OUR INTENTIONS HERE.

I MEAN, I KNOW I DEFINITELY GET IT.

I'M A REAL ESTATE BROKER.

SO I'VE BEEN IN, UH, IN REAL ESTATE FOR 10 YEARS NOW.

AND I SEE A LOT OF STUFF THAT HAPPENS.

I SEE A LOT OF WHAT WE CALL THE LIPSTICK ON A PIG KIND OF SCENARIOS, WHERE A LOT OF PEOPLE KIND OF BLANKET INVESTORS IN THIS TYPE OF, UM, YOU KNOW, UH, SUBDIVISION OR WHATEVER IT IS THAT YOU'RE DOING, EVEN IF YOU'RE FLIPPING HOUSES.

UH, YOU'VE, YOU'VE GOT KIND OF THIS, UM, DEFINITION THAT, THAT IS JUST, UH, TRYING TO MAKE A QUICK BUCK, TRYING TO GET IN AND OUT, DO IT AS CHEAP AS POSSIBLE.

SO WE CAN MAKE AS MUCH MONEY AS POSSIBLE.

THAT IS WHERE WE DIFFER.

AND THAT IS REALLY, HONESTLY, THE REASON THAT WE'RE DOING THIS TODAY, UH, IS SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE I WAS, I LIVE IN FORNEY.

SO I SELL A LOT OF HOMES IN THAT AREA.

90% OF THE PEOPLE I WORK WITH, THEY ALL WANT LAND, THEY WANT AN ACRE, BUT YOU KNOW, HOW THE PRICES HAVE GOTTEN THE PRICES HAVE JUST GOTTEN SO OUT OF CONTROL THAT I DON'T REALLY UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH LONGER THAT CAN HAPPEN BEFORE.

YOU KNOW, PEOPLE ARE UNABLE TO AFFORD TO EVEN RENT BECAUSE RENT FOLLOWS, YOU KNOW, THESE MORTGAGES.

SO THE WHOLE CONCEPT WAS TO, TO HELP KIND OF CREATE SOME INVENTORY FOR THAT, UH, CREATE, NOT ONLY GIVE THE PEOPLE A LITTLE ELBOW ROOM

[00:55:01]

INSTEAD OF THESE LITTLE TINY LOTS, AND THEY'RE GETTING SMALLER EVERY DAY, I WOULD ALSO MAKE IT AFFORDABLE.

AND THEN ALSO THE, THE BIGGEST PART TOO, IS HAVING IT, HAVING IT IN AREAS WHERE THE TAXES AREN'T QUITE AS HIGH.

AND SO THAT THEREFORE YOUR PRICE POINTS ARE STILL, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE GOING TO BE 180 AND UP IN THIS, IN THIS AREA, UH, WITH THE TAX RATE BEING AS LOW AS IT IS HERE COMPARED TO MY NEIGHBORHOOD, UH, YOU KNOW, YOUR, YOUR MONTHLY PAYMENT, WHICH IS WHAT MOST PEOPLE ARE CONSCIOUS ABOUT.

THAT'S WHAT WE'RE REALLY TRYING TO FOCUS ON.

SO TO THAT SAME POINT, WHEN WE WERE PUTTING THESE, THESE HOMES THAT WE'RE GOING TO, WE'RE PLANNING TO BRING IN, UM, WE, WE, WE DO THAT TOP END.

WE DO CONCRETE RUNNER FOUNDATIONS.

WE DON'T, WE DON'T DO THE, HEY, WHAT IS THE CHEAPEST ROUTE TO GET US IN AND OUT OF HERE? LET'S, YOU KNOW, WE'RE, WE'RE ACTUALLY LOOKING TO, UH, MAKE IT A NICE PLACE AND REALLY, IT WOULD BE PROUD OF WHAT WE'RE DOING.

WE'RE NOT, WE'RE ABSOLUTELY.

I WOULD NEVER PUT MY NAME ON ANYTHING THAT I WOULD NOT STAND BEHIND ALL THE WAY TO COMPLETION AND MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY'S HAPPY.

UM, I MEAN, I'VE GOT A MOUNTAIN OF PEOPLE I CAN SHARE WITH YOU JUST AS A CHARACTER KIND OF WITNESSED THAT, THAT WOULD, THAT WOULD, YOU KNOW, I KNOW IT'S NOT GOING TO DO ME ANY GOOD RIGHT NOW, BUT SO YOU'RE NOT JUST, YOU'RE NOT JUST CUTTING THESE, CUTTING THIS PROPERTY UP INTO LOTS OF SELLING THE LOTS OFF YOU PLAN TO BUILD.

YOU'RE ALSO THE BUILDER.

YES.

OKAY.

I HAVE A, I HAVE, UH, AN IDEA, UH, THAT WOULD GIVE MR. WILLIAMS AN OPPORTUNITY TO, UH, IN HIS PARTNER, GET THEM TOGETHER AND HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ACTUALLY MEET AND DISCUSS WITH THE FOLKS THAT ARE HERE TODAY.

AND WE COULD TABLE THIS ACTION.

UH, THEY COULD CERTAINLY INVOKE THEIR RIGHT THAT'S THAT'S IN PLACE WITH 30 DAYS, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE TO DO THAT IF WE WELL THAT'S, I THINK THAT'S WHAT I WAS HOPING TO ACHIEVE IS, UH, I WONDER IF YOU'D BE WILLING TO, TO VOLUNTARILY EXTEND THE APPROVAL PERIOD FOR SAY ANOTHER 14 DAYS, ANOTHER TWO WEEKS AND, UH, POTENTIALLY HAVE, UH, HAVE THE RESIDENTS OUT THERE, HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH YOU GUYS AND GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT YOUR PLAN IS.

AND, UH, I'D BE HAPPY TO TRY TO, UH, PROVIDE A PLACE FOR THAT MEETING AND YOU DON'T MAKE IT, UH, MAKE IT A, UH, YOU KNOW, A PRODUCTIVE SESSION.

UH, IF YOU GUYS WOULD BE WILLING TO EXTEND THE, YOU KNOW, JUST VOLUNTARILY EXTEND FOR 14 DAYS, UM, YOU KNOW, WITH THE WEATHER, I'M SURE YOU PROBABLY TWO WEEKS, ISN'T GOING TO, YOU DON'T NEED TO START TURNING DIRT IN TWO WEEKS.

I'M ALREADY STARTING CLEARED, CLEARED SOME LAND CLEARED, SOME LAND, JUST TRYING TO, OKAY, WELL THAT HAPPENS, BUT I JUST WONDER IF YOU'D BE WILLING TO DO THAT TODAY, IF YOU, IF YOU COULD JUST, UH, ALLOW THE COUNTY AND, UH, KAREN, DO YOU KNOW, IS THAT, CAN WE DO THAT? CAN WE EXTEND THIS VOLUNTARILY EXTEND THIS PERIOD? YES.

WELL, WE JUST MADE A STATEMENT ON THE RECORD THAT YOU'RE GRAIN AGREEING TO EXTEND THE 30 DAY DEADLINE BY 14 DAYS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPER AND COMMUNITY A CHANCE TO MEET THAT WE WOULD NEED TABLE THIS TODAY, LET YOU MEET WITH THE COMMUNITY, GET THAT KIND OF INPUT, AND THEN WE'LL PUT IT BACK ON THE AGENDA.

SO IS THIS SOME WAY I COULD POTENTIALLY MAKE A PHONE CALL AND GET HIS APPROVAL? CAUSE I REALLY DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THAT WE'LL BE MEETING, WE'LL BE MEETING FOR LONGER.

AND SO, UH, WE, WE WE'LL JUST PASS ON THIS ITEM.

YOU'RE WELCOME TO DO THAT.

IT'S LIKE A STEP INTO, YEAH, JUST STEP OUT AND THEN GIVE ME A HIGH SIGN AND WE'LL BRING IT BACK UP.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

SO WE'LL MOVE ON PAST SIX AND THEN GO ON TO ITEM SEVEN.

[7. Chief Kitchens; Discuss and approve deputation of Victor Bates from a Reserve Deputy Constable position to a Full time Deputy Constable position to fill new added position in the K.C.F.W.S.D .1-C patrol contract.]

I KEEP GETTING YOU CONFUSED CONSTABLE.

IT SAYS CHIEF KITCHENS, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE CONSTABLE JOHNSON.

HE ACTUALLY HAD SOME OTHER ISSUES THAT HE HAD TO DEAL WITH ONE JUDGE WARREN COMMISSIONERS.

SO THIS IS CONSTABLE JOSH DISCUSSED, UH, AN APPROVED FOR APPROVAL DEPUTIZATION OF VICTOR BATES FROM RESERVE DEPUTY TO A FULL-TIME DEPUTY CONSOLE POSITION TO FILL THE NEWLY ADDED POSITION AND A WATER SUPPLY DISTRICT.

ONE PATROL CONTRACT.

YES, SIR.

THAT'S CORRECT.

UH, DEPUTY RESERVE, DEPUTY BICE HAS BEEN RESERVING WITH US SINCE DECEMBER.

UM, THE POSITION THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WAS ACTUALLY VOTED ON AND APPROVED BACK ON JANUARY THE 19TH, OR IT WAS CREATED BY, UH, MS. RAELYNN SMITH.

UM, SO EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED.

I'S DOTTED, T'S CROSS MEN THROUGH THE DA'S OFFICE.

WE JUST WANT TO BRING MR. BATES OVER AND GET THIS POSITION FILLED AND MAKE THE COMMUNITY SCIFI BUDGET SQUARED AWAY.

YES, SIR.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR NO QUESTIONS? IS THERE A MOTION REGARDING A DEPUTIZATION OF VICTOR BATES? I'LL MAKE THAT TWO MOTION.

BOY, WE HAD A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT DEPUTIZATION FOR COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND, SECOND ONE COMMISSIONER BARBARA, DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED.

NO MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU, SIR.

THANK YOU.

UH, KAREN

[8. Karen Badgley; Discuss/Consider/Approve Pre-Trial Diversion funds for funding of District Attorney’s Office Pre-Trial Diversion Officer/Case Manager”]

BASICALLY DISCUSSED CONSIDER APPROVAL,

[01:00:01]

UH, FOR APPROVAL OF PRE-TRIAL DIVERSION FUNDS FOR FUNDING OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FROM PRETRIAL DIVERSION.

OFFICER I'LL JUST KEEP SWITCHING PEOPLE ON ME, YOU KNOW, WELL, SHE NEVER KNOWS IF I'M GOING TO COME OR NOT.

SO, UH, JUST A LITTLE HISTORY, UH, PRETRIAL DIVERSION IS A PROGRAM THAT WE'VE ALWAYS HAD.

IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS ACTUALLY MONITORED.

IS JOHNNY HERE? YEP.

COME ON UP JOHNNY.

IT WAS ACTUALLY MONITORED, UH, BY LANCE WASHBURN THROUGH THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT.

SO WE'VE ALWAYS, UM, HAD PRETRIAL DIVERSION, BUT WE'RE TRYING TO JUST DO IT BETTER.

UH, LANCE REACHED OUT TO ME ABOUT THREE, FOUR MONTHS AGO AND SAID THE PERSON AND THE GRANT THAT HE GETS, THE PERSON WAS KIND OF RESIGNING FROM THAT POSITION AND IN HIS OFFICE.

SO IN PROBATION AND THAT IS THAT SOMETHING I WANT TO PICK BACK UP? SO BASICALLY IT WAS, IT WAS A GOOD POINT TO, TO LOOK AT DOING THAT.

SO JUST A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND PRETRIAL DIVERSION IS WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE IT IS.

IT IS REALLY TRYING TO DIVERT PEOPLE WITH THE RIGHT BACKGROUND AND CRIMINAL HISTORY.

FOR THOSE THAT ARE FAMILIAR WITH A LITTLE BACKGROUND IN CRIMINAL LAW, UNDERSTAND THAT WE REALLY WANT TO DIVERT PEOPLE OUT OF THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RIGHT CRIMINAL RECORD, WHICH MEANS NOT A CRIMINAL RECORD AND HOW WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO DIVERT THAT PERSON OUT.

SO THEY DON'T GET A CONVICTION.

WE WANT TO ROLL IN AN EXPUNCTION WITH THEIR RECORD OR CLEAN THEIR RECORD UP.

SO THAT'S WHAT THE PROGRAM ACTUALLY IS.

AND SO IN THAT END, THESE ARE FUNDS.

AND THE REASON I BRING IT TO YOUR ATTENTION, BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO BE ADDING AS PART OF, AND JOHNNY'S HERE WITH ME, JOHNNY'S DOING, AS YOU ALL KNOW, MR. WHITE DOES AND MONITORS IN HIS OFFICE, THE PRETRIAL SUPERVISION, THAT'S YOUR TITLE.

MAKE SURE I GET UP THAT BECAUSE YOU GOT TITLES AND JOHNNY IS WILLING TO SUPERVISE UNDER PRETRIAL DIVERSION, AS LONG AS IT IS, UH, SOMETHING THAT I'LL FUND THE POSITION FOR.

AND AS YOU ALL KNOW, AS WE'VE STOOD UP THE BOND OFFICE AND DEVELOPING THAT, I'VE PROVIDED SOME FUNDING FOR THAT.

AND NOW THE COUNTY HAS TAKEN THAT OVER.

SO I'LL STILL HAVE THE FUNDING.

AND I CHECKED WITH KAREN AND SHE WAS LIKE, OKAY, SO WHERE'S THE MONEY? HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR? SO IT'S A FUN THAT THE DA'S OFFICE HAS.

SO I'LL SHARE WITH Y'ALL HEARING ALL THAT.

I THINK YOU'VE ALREADY GOT IT.

I'VE GOT SOME ASSETS.

IF YOU CAN JUST TAKE ONE, PASS IT DOWN A LITTLE BIT.

THAT'S KIND OF WHAT THE BUDGET LOOKS LIKE.

AND THE MONEY'S DOWN THERE.

WE ALSO IN THE POSTING OF THAT PERSON, WE JUST WANT TO SHOW Y'ALL WHAT THE JOB DESCRIPTION LOOKS LIKE.

PROBATION OFFICER, TAKE ONE, PASS IT DOWN, PLEASE.

AND PASS IT DOWN.

I THINK THERE'S ENOUGH.

IT JUST GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT WE'RE DOING.

AND I WANTED TO HAVE YOU GUYS KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THE OFFICE WITH THE OVER, WE'RE LOOKING AT A START DATE IN APRIL, EXCEPT FOR SOME FIXED COSTS.

AS WE CONTINUE TO SPLIT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT THIS PRETRIAL DIVERSION PERSON'S GOING TO DO.

AND THE COUNTY PART OF THAT MAY BE NEXT YEAR.

WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT BUDGET, BUT I'M GOING TO HAVE TO PROVIDE THE STARTUP COSTS FOR PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING.

IT LOOKS LIKE, UH, NO OTHER THAN, YOU KNOW, IT WILL BE A DA'S POSITION.

I'LL JUST BE SUPERVISING THEM.

AND THE ONLY TWO QUESTIONS OR, UH, PROPOSALS THAT I WOULD SUGGEST WAS TO KIND OF RESTRUCTURE THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE IN THE HOUSE AND THEN CHANGE THE FEES THAT WE COLLECT.

IT'S A $50 FOR BOTH THE DIVERSION CASES IN THE PRETRIAL BOND CASES.

WE'RE CHARGING 10 A WEEK NOW, UM, THAT WENT UP A YEAR AGO.

SO I JUST WANT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT AND HAVE BOTH OF THEM PAY 50 AND THEN CHANGE THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE INSTEAD OF, UM, YOU KNOW, CAUSE YOU GUYS KNOW HOW, HOW OUR OFFICE HAS GROWN IN THE LAST, UH, TWO AND A HALF YEARS.

UM, SO I, MY TITLE WOULD BE MORE, UM, IN LINE WITH PROBATION AS WE'VE DISCUSSED DIRECTOR, AND THEN I WANT TO MOVE KATIE THOMAS.

WHO'S MY ASSISTANT TO THE DIVERSION, TO THE PRETRIAL BOND OFFICER OR THE NEW POSITION WILL BE THE VIRGIN OFFICER.

AND THEN WE'LL HAVE OUR INTAKE CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT.

THE FEES WOULD GO FROM $10 A WEEK TO 50, $40 A MONTH TO 15 MONTHS.

AND IT'D BE CONSISTENT.

PROBATION IS 60, I BELIEVE.

YES.

AND SO WE'RE RUNNING UNDER THAT, WHICH WE TALKED ABOUT THAT TOO.

SO IT KIND OF GIVES THEM A LITTLE BIT OF BREAK.

THE PROGRAM PAYS FOR ITSELF.

WE HOPE BETWEEN THE PHASE, BUT I ALSO HAVE TO BALANCE IT, A PERSON THAT, UH, IS INDIGENT.

IF THEY CAN'T PAY, THEY CAN'T PAY.

WE'RE NOT, YOU'RE NOT PAYING TO GET A PRETRIAL DIVERSION.

I MEAN, IT'S NOTHING THAT WE'RE PAYING.

IF YOU LOOK DOWN THERE AT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY WE COLLECT FOR PEOPLE IN THE PROGRAM THAT USE YOUR GENERAL IDEA OF THE CURRENT BALANCE THAT I'M HOLDING IN THAT ACCOUNT.

WE I'VE GONE DOWN ON THE FEES OVER THE LAST THREE YEARS.

THAT'S WHY THE NUMBERS HAVE GONE DOWN BECAUSE I DON'T NEED TO RUN A FUND BALANCE.

THIS PROGRAM NEEDS TO TAKE CARE OF ITSELF.

IF IT'S UNDER, THEN I MIGHT RAISE THE PHASE.

BUT IF IT'S OVER THIS MONEY SHOULD BE GIVEN BACK TO THE DEFENDANTS.

IT'S NOT MY MONEY.

AND OF COURSE Y'ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH, IT'S LIKE A LIBRARY FUND OR ONE OF THOSE FUNDS THERE'S ONLY

[01:05:01]

ONE OR TWO VERY LIMITED PURPOSES YOU CAN USE IT FOR.

AND IT'S FOR PRE-TRIAL SERVICES, EDUCATION, UM, APOLOGIZE, UH, PRETRIAL DIVERSION, A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT AND EDUCATION TO THAT END.

SO THERE'S NOT LIKE WE CAN REALLY PUT IT IN THE GENERAL FUND.

THERE'S NOTHING I CAN REALLY DO WITH IT, BUT REPURPOSE IT BACK INTO THE DEFENDANTS, HOPEFULLY WITH SERVICES.

AND WE'VE ALREADY GOT A REALLY GREAT RELATIONSHIP WITH LANCE WASHBURN.

WHO'S BEEN HELPING US EVEN WITH OUR PRETRIAL BOND SERVICES, BUT SOME OF THOSE COSTS HE'S LIKE, UH, Y'ALL NEED A DRONE SOFTWARE.

NOW YOU'RE YOUR TAR CARRYING.

Y'ALL Y'ALL NEED TO DO YOUR OWN COMPUTERS AND YOU'RE GOING TO BUY IT FOR SOME DRUGS SUPPLIES.

SO WE'RE ALREADY KIND OF REALIZING THAT THERE MIGHT BE SOME INCREASED COSTS EVEN AS WE MOVE FORWARD BECAUSE THAT PROBATION IS TELLING US THAT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO KEEP CARRYING US.

OKAY.

YEP.

THAT'S THAT'S THE ONLY OTHER COMMENT THAT I HAD WAS THE SOFTWARE ITSELF.

CAUSE WE'VE BEEN KIND OF PIGGYBACKING ON LINCOLN'S FOR THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS AND THE COMPANY, THE SOFTWARE COMPANY THEMSELVES HAVE NOTICED AND SAID, HEY, THESE AREN'T PROBATION CASES WHAT'S GOING ON.

SO, UM, SO THAT'S WHY THAT'S 62 40.

THAT'S THE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED SOFTWARE PROGRAM FOR BOND CASES IN DIVERSION CASES THAT THE DA'S OFFICE, MYSELF AND OFFICERS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO, TO, TO MANAGE THE CASE, TO DO THE CASE WORK.

SO I'M SURE Y'ALL HAVE QUESTIONS.

DOES IT COST TO THE COUNTY? ANYTHING? I MEAN, THAT'S THE QUESTION, RIGHT? WE ARE ADDING ANOTHER COUNTY EMPLOYEE THOUGH.

SO WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE RETIREMENT AND MEDICAL AND ALL THAT STUFF.

YES.

CAUSE WE WANTED TO THEY'RE COUNTY EMPLOYEES, BUT YES, WHAT'S THE BUDGET IMPACT OF THAT 19,250, APPROXIMATELY THE TOTAL IMPACT IS 55,000 TO PICK UP, UM, AS WE GO THROUGH IT.

I THINK WHAT WE'RE SAYING IS AT 55, ONE, ONE EIGHT, WHERE THAT 19 TO 50 IS WHAT WE'RE SAYING IS GOING TO BE FOR US FROM APRIL TO SEPTEMBER.

AND WE'RE GOING TO, WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO SEND THOSE ACROSS, BUT SOME OF THOSE OTHER COSTS IN OCTOBER, YEAH.

THE, THE BASE SALARY FOR THIS POSITION IS 38 FIVE.

THE TOTAL COST WITH EVERYTHING IS ABOUT 55, 56,000.

THERE'S THE MEDICAL BEING PICKED UP SOMEWHERE ELSE.

IT'S NOT ON THIS LIST.

NO, NO, IT'S NOT ON THIS LIST.

YOU'RE RIGHT.

IT'S NOT, BUT THAT'S JUST WHAT I KIND OF READ.

IT'S THE SAME NUMBER AS THE, THE MEDICAL, THE RETIREMENT IT'S GOING TO BE ABOUT THE SAME WAS THAT RIGHT? DID I GET THAT OR TO JUST THINK THAT NUMBER AND SAY, HALF OF IT, UH, WE HAD, WE HAD SENT THEM AND THE LISTING OF THE TOTAL COST OF A NEW EMPLOYEE.

I DON'T KNOW WHY PART OF, IT'S NOT THERE.

THE, THE INCREASES ON THAT THIRD LINE, THAT HALF OF IT WAS COMING OUT OF HIS BUDGET AND HALF OF IT'S COMING YOU NOW IT'S GOING TO ALL COME FROM ME.

SO THE WAY IT'S WRITTEN IS, AND I APOLOGIZE A LITTLE CONFUSING BECAUSE IT IS BECAUSE FROM FOUR OR FIVE TO NINE 30, WE'RE GOING TO SPEND 55,118 OUT OF THE DA'S BUDGET OF THAT 80 3006 OH ONE.

WHAT THE COUNTY'S IMPACT IS, IS NOT SHOWN ON THIS.

AND THAT'S WHAT THE JUDGE IS ASKING, WHAT IS IT GOING TO BE? THE RETIREMENT.

WHAT'S GOING TO BE THE MEDICAL.

AND THEN THERE'S LITTLE ASTERISKS THERE TO SHOW THAT, THAT I CAN GET YOU ALL THAT EXACT NUMBER.

I THOUGHT IT WAS ON THIS.

I RAN WITH IT BECAUSE WE'RE SAYING THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME COSTS IN THERE THAT WE'RE NOT W W THAT'S GOING TO HAVE TO BE PICKED UP IN OCTOBER, KEEP IN MIND IF THEY YOU'RE GOING TO HIRE THIS PERSON IN MARCH OR APRIL, YOU'RE LOOKING AT BECAUSE OF THE WEATHER AND EVERYTHING THAT IF WE POSTED, WE GET APPROVAL ON POSTS.

NOW WE'RE LOOKING AT FOUR OR FIVE AS OUR START DATE.

YEAH.

THAT PERSON HAS TO BE HERE 60 DAYS BEFORE THEY'RE EVEN ELIGIBLE TO GET ON OUR INSURANCE.

SO IT WOULD ONLY BE TWO OR THREE MONTHS THAT WOULD ACTUALLY OWN INSURANCE.

SO IT WOULDN'T BE THE FULL 9,900.

YEAH.

SO THERE IS A SMALL IMPACT, BUT I DON'T WANT TO BE DISHONEST WITH YOU GOING FORWARD IN OCTOBER, YOU'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT THE ENTIRE YEAR OF THE MEDICAL, BUT I WOULD ALWAYS PAY THE SALARY.

I PAY FOR THE INCREASE ON THE OTHER EMPLOYEES.

AND I SEE WHAT SHE HAS RIGHT HERE.

NOW.

I SAID, KAREN, SHE HAS SOCIAL SECURITY COSTS, BUT SHE HAS A BLANK THERE ON RETIREMENT.

YEAH, YEAH, YEAH.

THEN ARE THESE JUDGES THAT SOME OF YOUR FUNDING, THE POSITION, BUT THEN NEXT, NEXT BUDGET THAT YOU WILL SPLIT HALF THOSE COSTS WITH THE COUNTY.

IS THAT WHAT THAT, NO, I THINK THAT'S MICHELLE PUT THAT AS AN ASTERISK TO BE DISCUSSED BECAUSE THAT'S NOT HAPPENING TODAY BECAUSE I CAN TELL YOU I'M $38,000.

THE SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT 16,000.

NOT RIGHT.

THAT'S, THAT'S TOTALLY

[01:10:01]

WRONG.

SO SHE PROBABLY INCLUDED EVERYTHING IN THAT ONE LINE ITEM.

YEAH.

SO THE, AND THE ONLY REASON THAT THOSE COSTS WOULD BE SPLIT IS BECAUSE SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE WORKING UNDER THE BOND OFFICE AND THEN THAT PERSON'S GOING TO BE WORKING UNDER THE PRETRIAL DIVERSION.

YEAH.

UM, I BET I DO HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS.

ALL RIGHT.

Y'ALL NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS 80 SOMETHING THOUSAND DOLLARS IS IN A SEPARATE BANK ACCOUNT, NOT UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE COUNTY OR THE COUNTY AUDITOR OR THE COUNTY TREASURER, BECAUSE WE WERE TRYING TO SAY, WHERE'S THE MONEY COMING FROM THEN EARLY COMMENT.

EXPLAIN THAT TO ME YESTERDAY AFTERNOON.

I WANT THEM TO KNOW THAT THAT'S NOT COUNTING MONEY, RIGHT? WHAT I'M GOING TO DO.

IF YOU APPROVE THIS IS AFTER THAT PERSON IS HIRED, IT'LL BE JUST LIKE CONSTABLE PRECINCT.

TWO'S BILLING THAT WE DO.

WE'LL BE INVOICING THE DA FOR THAT MONTH OR THAT QUARTER FOR THAT EMPLOYEE'S PAY AND BENEFITS.

SO WE'LL HAVE A REVENUE SIDE THAT WILL SHOW US SOME INCOME COVERING HALF OF THAT COST, BUT THE REVENUES DOESN'T, IT'S NOT GONNA FULLY, IT'S NOT GOING TO TAKE CARE OF THE FULL HALF OF THAT THOUGH.

IS IT LOOKING AT THE JUDGE? IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE I'M JUST LOOKING AT THESE, UH, PRETRIAL DIVERSION RECEIPTS.

THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETELY PAY THAT HALF OF THE COST FOR THIS POSITION.

RIGHT? HALF OF THE COST IS, WOULD BE THE 55.

RIGHT.

AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE RECEIPTS FOR PRETRIAL DIVERSION IS SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 55 AND 22,000.

NO, YOU GOT 83 IS THE BALANCE, ISN'T IT? YEAH.

THIS IS THE BALANCE.

I MEAN, WE'LL BURN THROUGH THAT THOUGH.

RIGHT? AT 55,000 A YEAR WE'LL BURN IS THAT WE, WE, THE COST OF THE PROGRAM WAS GOING TO BE ABOUT 90,000.

OKAY.

AND THEN WE JUST DID A PRO RATA.

WE HAVE 83,000 AND A COUPLE OF THINGS.

I THINK THAT WE'LL BE ABLE TO ZERO THAT ACCOUNT.

I'VE REDUCED THE COST OF THE PROGRAM TO ALL THE DEFENDANTS, BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT TO CARRY A FUND BALANCE.

SO WITH US NOW STANDING UP AND BEING A LITTLE STRONGER, WE'LL PROBABLY PUT THOSE COSTS BACK WHERE THEY WERE TWO YEARS AGO.

AS YOU SEE, YOU CAN GET IT BACK TO THE 55,000.

ABSOLUTELY.

AND THEN OF COURSE, BEFORE THE MONEY THAT PROBATION COLLECTED, WHICH WAS A FEE, WE NEVER TOOK THAT MONEY.

POPE WHEEL OUT PROBATION HABITS, SINCE THEY DID THE SUPERVISION.

NOW THAT FLEE WILL FLOW BACK INTO OUR FUND.

AND I BELIEVE THAT WE'LL BE SOLVENT, BUT WE'LL KNOW FOR SURE, BECAUSE WE'LL GET AN IDEA OF WHERE WE ARE ON NINE 30 IN THAT TIME PERIOD, BEFORE WE COME BACK TO COMMISSIONER'S COURT.

IF MY IDEA IS CORRECT, I'D LIKE TO FINISH MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT HERE SO I CAN GET MY ANSWER, PLEASE.

MA'AM YES, MA'AM OKAY.

I KNOW HE INTERRUPTS ME ALL THE TIME.

UM, MR. JOHNNY MENTIONED THAT THE FEES, HE WAS GOING TO INCREASE THE FEES.

OKAY.

WHEN HE INCREASED THOSE FEES, ARE THERE GOING BACK INTO YOUR FUND OR IS IT GOING INTO HIS LINE ITEMS IN THE REVENUE SIDE? GREAT QUESTION.

I NEED TO KNOW THAT BECAUSE WE'LL HAVE TO GET THAT PROGRAM TO DO IT CORRECTLY.

WELL, KAREN, IT'S GOING TO BE, BECAUSE YOU'RE VERY EFFICIENT.

IT'S GOING TO BE SOME HOT TECHNOLOGY.

CAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE A SPLIT BECAUSE MY FEES ARE GOING TO GO BACK INTO THE PRETRIAL DIVERSION AND HIS ARE GOING TO GO BACK TO THE CAMERA THE WAY IT COULD BE USED FOR SIPSA THAT FUND BALANCE.

OKAY.

SO THIS IS KIND OF LIKE A LITTLE WORK IN PROGRESS.

JUDGE, WE'LL HAVE TO COME BACK FOR BUDGET, WORK WITH JERRY AND EXPLAINED TO HIM HOW WE NEED TO PRESENT THIS AND WHAT IS GOING TO COME FROM HER.

AND THEN WHAT'S THE COUNTY'S PORTION.

OKAY.

UM, ANOTHER QUESTION THIS 90, IS THIS CONSIDERED AN ANNUAL COST OR IS THAT JUST APRIL THROUGH SEPTEMBER? THAT'S THE ANNUAL COST WE'RE PROJECTING.

OKAY.

THAT'S ALL.

THANK YOU.

THOSE ARE HARD QUESTIONS.

ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? WELL, I DON'T TO INTERRUPT HER, INTERRUPTING YOU.

SO YOU TELL ME, CAN I TALK? I'M USED TO TALKING WHEN I WANT TO, BUT I'M JUST TELL ME WHEN I CAN TALK.

SO BOTTOM LINE.

YES, SIR.

THE ADDITIONAL COST TO THE COUNTY IS BASICALLY RETIREMENT AND INSURANCE AND THAT KIND OF THING.

IS THAT, IS THAT THE CONSENSUS? I DON'T KNOW.

I, I DON'T THINK IT IS.

I THINK THAT THAT RETIREMENT INSURANCE IS INCLUDED IN THAT SOCIAL SECURITY LINE.

IT'S GOT $16,000.

I THINK SHE'S GOT IT IN THERE.

WELL, IF NOT UNDER THE NEW BUDGET, SHE'LL JUST ASK FOR MORE MONEY.

WELL I COULD, BUT HERE'S THE THING IT'S GOING, WHAT I HOPE, FRANKLY, IT IS GOING TO BE TO, TO PAY FOR THE RETIREMENT AND THE SOCIAL SECURITY FOR THE PERSON.

BUT IF WE LOOK AT THESE COSTS, THE FIXED COSTS OF FURNITURE REALLY, I MEAN, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TRAINING FOR THE PERSON THAT'S PROBABLY ALREADY IN HIS LINE ITEM, UH, THAT MIGHT

[01:15:01]

BE INCREASED.

IT'S GOING TO BE, I WOULD SAY VERY SMALL.

THOSE ARE THE THINGS THAT Y'ALL ALREADY ARE FUNDING SOFTWARE, COMPUTER, BUT I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND STAND UP THE NEW SOFTWARE MYSELF, BUT WE'RE PUTTING THE WORST CASE SCENARIO.

SO WHEN I GET TO OUR BUDGET AND WE'RE LOOKING UNDER THIS, BECAUSE IT'S ACTUALLY KIND OF, YOU KNOW, YOU GOT JUDGE, UM, BLAIR IS HIS SUPERVISOR UNDER THE BOND.

AND THEN YOU'VE ALSO GOING TO HAVE ME SUPERVISING THE PRETRIAL DIVERSION THROUGH THE OFFICE, BUT JOHNNY'S UP AND RUNNING WITH, THIS IS WHAT HE'S DOING ALREADY.

SO IT COULD BE A COST OF WHATEVER YOU WORKED AT ABOUT 15% OF THAT 9,000 BUDGET.

IT'S HOPEFULLY Y'ALL WOULD ABSORB.

BUT IF YOU DON'T, IF YOU SAY, I'M NOT GOING TO DO IT AT YOUR PROGRAM, YOU DO IT YOURSELF.

THEN I'LL JUST DO IT MYSELF.

BUT IT'S GOING TO BE, IT'S GOING TO BE HARD FOR ME BECAUSE SOME OF THAT MONEY IS REALLY EARMARKED, RESTRICTED UNDERSTAND.

SO, OKAY.

SO BASICALLY THIS NEW POSITION AND ALL THE SUPPORT, WE THINK IT'LL COST ABOUT 90 GRAND A YEAR, EVERY YEAR.

YES.

AND THE LINE SHARE THAT MONEY, YOU THINK WILL, WILL THE OFFICER'S WILL GENERATE IT.

YES.

AND THEN THAT MONEY WILL GET YOU'LL BILL THEM FOR THAT MONEY AND THEN SHE'LL GET IT.

SO THERE'S SOME, WE HAVE COLLECTORS, RIGHT? THERE'S SOME LIKELY COSTS TO THE COUNTY, BUT, UH, PROBABLY A SMALL, RIGHT.

I'M CURIOUS.

I UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN SHE BILLS, IT'S ALWAYS IN HER FAVOR.

IF THERE'S EVER BEEN A PROBLEM, IT'S ALWAYS BEEN MORE.

I HAVE A CREDIT RIGHT NOW.

SO I'M JUST NOT SAYING ANYTHING.

I'M JUST SAYING, BUT NO, THOSE ARE GREAT QUESTIONS.

I BELIEVE THAT THE PROGRAM IS SOLVING AND IT'S REALLY GOOD FOR THE COMMUNITY, FOR THOSE CITIZENS THAT GET CAUGHT UP IN SOMETHING, BUT WE WANT TO DIVERT THEM OUT.

WE REALLY DON'T WANT TO HAVE A RECORD.

WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ALL THE WAY THROUGH WITH ITS FUNCTIONS TO CLEAN UP RECORDS.

THAT'S THE PLAN.

AND THERE'S ALSO, YOU KNOW, AT LEAST POTENTIAL COST SAVINGS BECAUSE THESE GUYS AREN'T GOING INTO THE COUNTY JAIL.

OKAY.

OH YEAH.

IT'S IT'S I WOULDN'T EVEN GO, GO TO TOUT THAT, BUT OCCASIONALLY, AND IF WE GET ON IT, JOHNNY'S ALREADY THERE.

HE'S, THAT'S WHY HE'S THE PERFECT PERSON.

THERE'S PEOPLE HE ALREADY SEES THAT WERE GREAT CANDIDATES FOR PRETRIAL DIVERSION.

AND, AND HONESTLY, IT'S NOT, I MEAN, I JUST APPRECIATE PROBATION.

HAVEN'T DONE IT FOR SO LONG.

IT'S REALLY, THEY DON'T, THEY DON'T HAVE TO.

UM, BECAUSE THAT'S THE OTHER SIDE OF THE HOUSE WHEN THEY, WHEN THE PRETRIAL DIVERSION DOESN'T WORK.

SO THAT'S A GREAT BURDEN JOHNNY, TO BE THE PERFECT PERSON.

HE IS THE PART OF A PERSON IT'S A BETTER FIT FOR OUR OFFICE, ALONG WITH OUR MISSION, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THEY'RE ACTUALLY NOT ON PROBATION, BUT PROBATION HAS BEEN SUPERVISING THEM.

SO IT'S JUST A, IT'S JUST A BETTER FIT FOR THE MISSION OF OUR OFFICE.

SO, OKAY.

LET'S CALL THE QUESTION.

YEP.

FINISH YOUR PHILLIPS.

WANTS TO CALL A QUESTION.

SO, UH, WHAT WHAT'S BEFORE US WOULD BE TO APPROVE THE PREDICT PRETRIAL DIVERSION FUNDS GENERALLY AS PRESENTED HERE.

UH, IS THERE A MOTION I'LL MAKE SENSE EMOTION BY MR. PHILLIPS MAKES A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT, UH, PRETRIAL DIVERSION FUNDING IS YOUR SECOND, SECOND SEGMENT COMMISSIONER AND KATE'S DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE.

OPPOSED? NO MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU ALL.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

NOW

[9. Auditor; Discuss/Consider line item transfers]

FOR THE AUDITOR, DISCUSS, DISCUSS, CONSIDERED LINE ITEM TRANSFERS MET THEM.

YES, SIR.

SO THESE WERE EMAILED TO YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND REVIEW.

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY.

UM, OKAY.

WELL, UH, THERE HE IS.

OKAY.

DO YOU WANT ME TO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE AUDITOR AND LINE? I DON'T TRANSFER AS IF NOT AS HER A FOR APPROVAL AS PRESENTED.

I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER BARBARA DISCUSSION.

OH, HOW ABOUT A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND PERMISSION, PHILLIPS DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE.

OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES.

WE HAVE, UH,

[6. Monique Hunter; Discuss/Consider motion to approve replat of lot 22 of the Meadow Ranch Estates (Part 2 of 2)]

YOU'LL SEE, MR. WILLIAMS, COME BACK IN MR. WILLIAMS, IF YOU CARE TO COME UP AND UPDATE US ON ANYTHING, YOU GOT TO SAY THAT'S BACK TO ITEM SIX, RIGHT? OKAY.

I SPOKE TO MY PARTNER.

UM, HE, HE HANDLES, I DO THE REAL ESTATE SIDE AND PRETTY MUCH THAT'S KIND OF MY REALM.

HE HANDLES THE FINANCIALS AND THE CONSTRUCTION SIDE OF THINGS.

UH, HE SAID, UNFORTUNATELY, DUE TO OUR COMMITMENTS, OUR FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS AND THE ASSETS THAT WE HAVE IN PLACE AND EVERYTHING THAT WE'VE GOT IN MOTION FROM THAT FINANCING SIDE THAT HE'S NOT WILLING TO DO THAT.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU, SIR.

THANK YOU.

YEAH, YEAH, YEAH.

AND THIS MEETING WAS KIND OF AT THE END, BUT THE 30 DAYS ANYWAY, WHEN HE QUIT, W WHAT WAS THE DATE OF FILING MONEY? THE QUESTION IS WHAT WAS THE DATE OF FILING

[01:20:03]

THE DATE? THEY HAD A COMPLETE PACKET WAS TWO NINE IS WHEN WE SUBMITTED FOR THE AGENDA.

CAUSE USUALLY ONCE WE HAVE A COMPLETE PACKAGE, FEBRUARY 9TH, IS THAT WHAT YOU SAID? YEAH, A WEEK.

I MEAN, I DON'T HAVE ANY IN FRONT OF ME.

I APOLOGIZE.

THIRD IS OUR NEXT COMMISSIONER'S COURT.

SO THE TABLE FOR A WEEK.

YEAH.

YEAH.

JOHN JUST PROPOSE THAT WE TABLE THIS FOR A WEEK.

OKAY.

UH, THE COUNTY STILL WITHIN ITS, IT'S A TIMEFRAME.

UM, I'LL OFFER TO THE DEVELOPER THAT, UH, AS WELL AS THE RESONANCE THAT IF YOU AND YOUR PARTNER WOULD BE WILLING, I THINK IT'D BE VERY PRODUCTIVE IF WE COULD, UH, HAVE A, HAVE A MEETING, UH, WHERE IN, UH, YOU TWO GUYS BOTH COULD, UM, MEET YOUR NEIGHBORS OUT THERE, SO TO SPEAK AND THEN, UH, MAYBE GIVE THEM SOME ASSURANCES, UH, GIVE US AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A LITTLE MORE INFORMATION HERE IN THE COURT.

UH, CERTAINLY ALLOW ME TO MAKE, UH, A BETTER RECOMMENDATION TO THE REST OF THE COURT AS WELL ON OUR VOTING.

AND, UH, AND SO I JUST, UH, UH, I'LL JUST PROPOSE THAT WE TABLE THIS UNTIL THE THIRD, FEBRUARY THE THIRD.

AND THAT WOULD TAKE THAT AS A MOTION TO THEN ALSO I'LL ALL OF THAT.

I WILL PROPOSE AS A MOTION.

OKAY.

WE HAVE MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER IN CASE THE TABLE ITEMS MARCH THE THIRD, IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND COMMISSIONER BARBARA DISCUSSION.

I WOULD SAY THE HOMEOWNERS REALLY NEED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH YOUR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION.

I MEAN, IF YOU'VE LEARNED ANYTHING FROM THIS, IT'S MOVE FORWARD WITH WHAT YOU CAN DO AND THEN TO STOP SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE.

SO JUST LEARN FROM IT.

IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE COUNTY, AS SYMPATHETIC AS WE WANT TO BE, YOU KNOW, WE ALL UNDERSTAND THE, THE LOVE OF THE RURAL LIFESTYLE.

I HAVE IT AS WELL, BUT, UH, AS OUR ATTORNEY POINTED OUT COUNTY AUTHORITY IS JUST WHAT IT IS.

AND, UH, THE ABILITY TO, TO, UH, IMPACT SOME OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, WHETHER IT'S DESIRABLE OR NOT IS RESTRICTED TO THE LEGISLATURE.

AND THAT WOULD, UH, THAT'D BE REPRESENTATIVE KEITH BELL'S OFFICE, UH, WOULD, YOU KNOW, WOULD CERTAINLY BE SOMEONE THAT YOU MIGHT WANT TO, TO, UH, TOUCH BASE WITH.

BUT, UH, I'M SURE KEITH, I LOVE THAT, BUT, UH, BACK THE BUS UP, WE HAVE A, I'M SORRY, BUT, BUT, UM, YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S ONLY SO MUCH THAT THE COUNTY CAN DO SO, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, IS THERE ANY MORE DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE.

OPPOSED? NO.

OKAY.

THAT ITEM IS TABLED.

NOW I'LL GO BACK TO THE AUDITOR,

[10. Auditor; Discuss/Consider claims for payment.]

UH, CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AUDITOR.

YES.

THESE ARE EMAILED TO YOU EARLIER.

AND THEN WE HAD TWO ADDITIONS BECAUSE OF THE SNOW WEATHER, BUT TO GET THINGS PAID.

AND, UM, YOUR ACTUAL CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT ARE 606 MILLION, 683,382 89 WITH A PAYROLL OF 1,000,360 $1,760 AND 58 CENTS.

TOTAL PAYOUT IS $8,045,143 AND 47 CENTS.

YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE BILLS? THE DEBT PAYMENTS WERE PAID.

THAT'S THE 5 MILLION, THREE 97 TO 82 OH FOUR THAT WAS DONE WITH WIRE TRANSFERS.

I ASKED FOR YOUR APPROVAL, PLEASE.

QUESTIONS FOR THE AUDITOR.

IF THERE ARE NONE, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AS PRESENTED? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION.

SO, UH, SO MOVED FROM, UH, COMMISSIONER CATES AS HER SECOND.

I'LL SECOND, SECOND, COMMISSIONER BARBARA DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED.

NO MOTION CARRIES OUT 11.

YEAH.

YES MA'AM.

CAN I, CAN I GIVE ONE UPDATE REAL QUICK? OKAY.

UM, YOU KNOW, THAT WE HAD, WE HAD FILED FOR THE COVID CARE MONEY WITH TETUM AND WE HAD SO MUCH TROUBLE GIVING THEM EVERYTHING THAT THEY NEEDED AND REQUIRED, AND THEY STILL WANTED MORE.

AND THEN THEY LET US DO SOME ADDITIONAL STUFF WITH PAYROLL.

AND WE DID THAT.

I GOT INFORMATION YESTERDAY THAT ALL OF THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED AND OUR MONEY SHOULD BE HITTING OUR BANK ACCOUNT THIS WEEK.

AND WE OWE A GREAT DEAL OF THANKS, UH, FOR OUR STATE REPRESENTATIVE KEITH BELL, WHO WAS, WAS VERY HELPFUL IN HELPING US RECOVER THE MONEY THAT WE HAD NOT

[01:25:01]

SPENT.

AND SO, BUT YUP.

THAT WAY WE CAN GIVE THE MONEY THAT Y'ALL APPROVE FOR BROAD THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND FOR THE NON-PROFITS.

OKAY.

UH, I DON'T THINK I, THAT I HAVE A MOTION FOR, TO APPROVE CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT.

YEAH.

OKAY.

WE HAD MOTION IN A SECOND.

UH, WE DIDN'T VOTE THAT.

DID WE? I SECOND SECONDED SOMETHING.

OKAY.

SO I DON'T THINK THOSE GUYS VOTED.

THEY WERE OKAY.

UH, SO LET'S, LET'S, LET'S JUST MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE A CLEAR BOAT ON THAT.

UH, WE HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND TO APPROVE CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AS PRESENTED THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

UH, IT WAS POSED NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES NOW, UH, DISCUSS, CONSIDER EXITING

[11. Judge Richards; Discuss/Consider exiting regular meeting and enter an executive session.]

REGULAR MEETING AND ENTERING INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

IS THERE A MOTION TO LEAVE OUR MEETING AND GO TO EXECUTIVE? I'LL MAKE THAT ONE.

WE HAD A MOTION COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS.

IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND SEGMENT COMMISSIONER CAGE DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED.

NO MOTION CARRIES WE'RE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.

UH, THOSE OF YOU WHO NEED TO PARTICIPATE, KNOW WHO YOU ARE, UH, STANDBY.

AND WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A SHORT BREAK.

YOU ARE OKAY.

OKAY.

UH, OKAY.

WE'RE

[14. Judge Richards; Discuss/Consider exiting executive session and enter back into regular meeting.]

BACK FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION.

I NEED SOMEBODY TO MAKE A MOTION TO COME BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION.

I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION.

WE HAVE A MOTION COMMISSIONER HUNT.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND SACRUM COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES.

UH, BUT I DON'T HEAR ANY EMOTIONS COMING FROM THE COURT.

UH, WE DIDN'T TAKE ANY, UH THERE'S NO ACTION TAKEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION.

UH, I DON'T HEAR ANY MOTIONS, SO I JUST HAVE

[16. Adjourn Regular Meeting]

ONE MORE MOTION.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.

THIS PERMISSION TO ADJOURN.

THE MEETINGS ARE SECOND I'LL SECOND SEGWIT COMMISSIONER BORROWER, DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.