Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript


TRAEGER MEETING

[00:00:01]

THIS REGULAR

[Call to Order]

MEETING OF THE COFFIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT IS CALLED TO ORDER.

TODAY IS TUESDAY, APRIL SIX, 2021 9:00 AM OR IN THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT MEETING ROOM LOCATED IN THE COURTHOUSE ANNEX.

UH, AS WE ALWAYS DO, WE'LL START OFF OUR MEETING WITH AN INVOCATION FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGES.

UH, PASTOR KYLE IS GOING TO OFFER THE INVOCATION AND COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS ASK IF HE COULD DO THE PLEDGES, OF COURSE, THAT'D BE WELL, FATHER, WE COME TO YOU THIS MORNING, WHICH IS THANK YOU FATHER, FOR THE ABILITY TO BE ABLE TO DO THE THINGS THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE WITHIN OUR COUNTY FATHER.

WE ASK YOUR BLESSING UPON THIS TIME, PAULA, WE ASK THAT YOU JUST BLESS THOSE THAT WANT TO SEE OUR COUNTY DO WHAT IT NEEDS TO BE DONE ACCORDING TO YOUR GLORY AND RICHES IN HEAVEN.

FATHER, WE JUST WANT TO GIVE YOU ALL THE GLORY AND THE HONOR FOR ALL THAT YOU'RE DOING, LORD, WE ASK ALL THIS IN THE WONDERFUL, PRECIOUS NAME OF JESUS CHRIST.

HEY MAN.

AND THEN TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL THE TEXAS ONE STATE UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU, PASTOR.

WE AL WE, WE REALLY DO APPRECIATE YOUR COMING.

I THINK THAT ADDS A LOT TO GET US STARTED STARTED, RIGHT? UM, WE HAVE A QUORUM PRESENT TODAY.

UH, COMMISSIONER KATES IS NOT, UH, HE'S NOT IN THE, IN THE COURTROOM WITH US TODAY, BUT HE IS JOINED US, UH, BY PHONE HE'S AT A CONFERENCE.

SO NEXT ITEM IS ROUTINE COURSE.

I MEAN, IT'S A ROUTINE CORRESPONDENCE.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ROUTINE CORRESPONDENCE TO SHARE? I HAVE NONE.

SO WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM TWO.

THAT IS THE CONSENT AGENDA.

WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA TODAY, CAUSE THAT'S A PRETTY EASY LIFTING AND I'M LOOKING FOR THE COFFIN CITY MANAGER, BUT HE'S NOT HERE.

MR. POLLSTER IS NOT HERE YET.

UH,

[6. Raylan Smith; award of contract to TexasBit for road improvements to Bond Project #23 - Taylor Rd -Merle Dr, Precinct 1, in the amount of $327,724.39; utilizing RFB 20-07A.]

REGULAR, IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'RE GOING TO GET TO KICK THE MEETING OFF.

I'M GOING TO GO ALL THE WAY DOWN TO ITEM SIX, THE WORD CONTRACT TO TEXAS BID FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO BOND PROJECT NUMBER 23 TAYLOR ROAD MOREL DRY PRECINCT ONE IN THE AMOUNT OF THREE 27, SEVEN 24.

GOOD MORNING.

UH, WHAT WE HAVE THIS MORNING IS OUR COUNTY ROAD PROJECT NUMBER 23.

THIS IS FOR PRECINCT ONE IN THIS WOULD BE TO AWARD IT TO TEXAS BIT UNDER A CURRENT RFP QUESTIONS FOR RAILING.

IF NOT, YES, SIR.

A MOTION TO APPROVE.

WE HAVE MOTION COMMISSIONER HUNT, EXCEPT THAT BIT AS PRESENTED.

IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND SEGMENT COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED NO MOTION CARRIES

[7. Raylan Smith; Discuss/Consider award of contract to TexasBit for road improvements to Bond Project #24 - CR 124 - Frann Drive, Precinct 1, in the amount of $819,116.33 utilizing RFB 20-07A.]

NEXT UP.

DISCUSS CONSIDER AWARD OF CONTRACT TO TEXAS BID FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO BOND PROJECT NUMBER 24 COUNTY ROAD ONE 24 FRAN DRIVE PRECINCT ONE IN THE AMOUNT OF 819,001 16, UH, SAME SONG, DIFFERENT VERSE.

UH, THIS WILL BE FOR OUR NEXT ROAD BOND PROJECT.

NUMBER 24 QUESTIONS.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HUNT TO APPROVE THE CONTRACT.

IS THERE AS PRESENTED THERE? IS THERE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER BARBARA DISCUSSION? IT WAS A FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES NEXT

[8. Raylan Smith; Discuss/Consider award of contract to TexasBit for road improvements to Precinct 4 Bond Project #59 - Country Club in the amount of $289,282.52; and Project Chaparrel, Morningside & Quail Creek Run in the amount of $337,031.68; utilizing RFB 20-07A.]

AUTOMATE DISCUSS CONSIDER AWARD OF CONTRACT TO TEXAS BID FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TO PRECINCT FOR BOND PROJECT NUMBER 59 COUNTRY CLUB IN THE AMOUNT OF 289,002 82, UH, PROJECT CHAPPARAL, MORNINGSIDE AND QUAIL RUN AND AMOUNT OF AND PROJECT CHAPPARAL, MORNINGSIDE AND QUAIL RUN IN THE AMOUNT OF 337 OH 31 QUESTIONS.

SO THIS ONE IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT AND I'LL ALSO HAVE PROVIDED THE ACCOUNTING CLERK WITH A COPY.

UM, THE MOTION WILL NEED TO BE AMENDED.

WHAT WE HAVE IS WE'RE COMBINING MORNINGSIDE QUAIL CREEK AND CHAPARRAL FOR A TOTAL OF 229,009, 47 56.

THIS ONE WOULD BE, THIS WILL INITIALLY BE PAID OUT OF DISCRETIONARY FUNDS.

UM, PRECINCT FOUR WILL RECEIVE A TECHSTAR REIMBURSEMENT GRANT FOR CHAPARRAL IN THE AMOUNT OF 150,000 TO 45.

THEN THE COUNTRY CRA COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE PROJECT IS QUOTED AT 389,000 TO 82 52.

UM, AND SO THIS WILL BE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED, UH, BECAUSE TEXAS BIT, THERE HAS BEEN A PORTION OF THIS ROAD THAT'S ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED.

SO, UM,

[00:05:01]

THIS MOTION, LIKE I SAID, I'VE GOT THE AMOUNTS WHICH HAVE BEEN AMENDED AND THEN IT WILL JUST NEED TO BE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED.

SO THE TWO 29, UM, IT'S ON THE TOP OF THAT HANDOUT TWO WEEKS.

YEAH, TWO 82 52.

SO IT'LL BE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS AND THEN PROJECT NUMBER 59.

YES.

SO IT JUST, IT TOOK US A LITTLE WHILE TO GET ALL OF THAT SQUARED AWAY THIS PAST WEEK.

OKAY.

THAT MAKES SENSE.

COMMISSIONER KATE'S YES.

THAT'S UH, THAT'S ACCURATE.

OKAY.

UM, SO I GUESS WHAT WE WOULD ASK FOR, WE CAN JUST SIMPLIFY THIS.

I THINK THE MOTION TO APPROVE WOULD BE AMENDED PER THE CONVERSATION AND PER THE, WHAT WAS JUST PRESENTED BY RAELYNN.

IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION JUDGE.

CAN WE HAVE THAT MOTION FOR COMMISSIONED CASE? IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND COMMISSIONER HUNT DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED NO MOTION CARRIES.

[9. Raylan Smith; Discuss/Consider the purchase of a 2020 Ford F-350 in the amount of $48,108.00 from Rush Truck Center; utilizing Buyboard Contract #601-19 for Precinct #2.]

ALL RIGHT.

LAST ITEM RAILING, UH, DISCUSS CONSIDER PURCHASE OF A 2020 FORD F THREE 50 IN THE AMOUNT OF 48,108 FROM RUSH TRUCK CENTER UTILIZING BUYBOARD CONTRACT, UH, SIX OH ONE 19 FOR PRECINCT TWO COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS IS GOING TO BUY AN F THREE 50 OUT OF HIS EQUIPMENT LINE ITEM.

THERE WILL BE NO FINANCING QUESTIONS.

THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS.

IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT PURCHASE? UM, MAKE A MOTION.

WE HAD THAT MOTION COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND, SECOND ONE COMMISSIONER HUNT, DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

MA'AM NOW, UH, JUGGLING THE AGENDA CON AGAIN, UH,

[5. Mike Slye; Discuss/Consider/Approve deed to City of Kaufman for "The North Vi of Lot 55, Harmony Estates, an addition to the City of Kaufman, Kaufman County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Cabinet 1, Envelope 652, Plat Records of Kaufman County, Texas. Account No. 25103."]

UH, I'M GOING TO ASK THE CITY MANAGER A CALL FROM THE CITY MANAGER.

MIKE SLIDE, COME DISCUSS, CONSIDER FOR APPROVAL, A DEED TO CITY OF COFFIN FOR THE NORTH ONE HALF OF LOT 55 HARMONY A STAGE, AND AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF KAUFFMAN, ACCORDING TO THE MAYOR PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AND CABINET ONE ENVELOPE SIX 52 PLAT RECORDS OF COFFIN COUNTY ACCOUNT NUMBER TWO FIVE ONE ZERO THREE.

GOOD MORNING, MR. SLY MORNING, JUDGE.

AND THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME, UH, COMMISSIONERS.

I THINK WE FINALLY GOT THIS THING, RIGHT? THIS HAS BEEN ON YOUR AGENDA.

I THINK THE LAST THREE MEETINGS OR THERE'S A THIRD MEETING, UH, THIS IS A PROPERTY ON MELODY CIRCLE THAT WAS FORECLOSED UPON AND STRUCK OFF TO THE COUNTY, UH, WITH CRUST TO THE OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS.

THIS, UH, PROPERTY IS ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL TO A STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT THAT WE HAVE SCHEDULED AND DESIGNED THE COUNCIL, UH, CITY COUNCIL TOOK ACTION TO ISSUE DEBT AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS YEAR.

AND THIS SUMMER WE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS THAT WOULD INVOLVE BRINGING A THOUGHT BY FOUR RCB BOX DOWN THROUGH THAT PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY.

AND WE'RE ASKING THE COUNCIL OR THE COMMISSIONERS TO, UH, DEED THAT PROPERTY TO THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ACCOUNT OR THE CITY.

AND WE'LL MAKE THOSE IMPROVEMENTS AND CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN THAT PROPERTY.

AFTER I THINK, UH, PROVIDED, UH, A SCHEMATIC OF WHAT IT IS WE'RE ASKING YOU TO DO AND WHAT WE'RE INTENDING TO DO.

UH, AND WE WOULD ASK YOUR APPROVAL TO DEED THAT PROPERTY, THAT THE CITY QUESTIONS FOR MR. SLY.

NOPE.

OKAY.

IF NOT, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT DEED TO THAT PROPERTY? I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION WHERE THAT MOTION COMMISSIONER HUNT.

IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE.

I'LL DO ANYTHING TO KEEP I'M LOOKING AT.

MY EYES ARE STARTING TO WATER.

JUST LOOKING AT YOU.

NO, I APPRECIATE THAT MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU, SIR.

ALL RIGHT.

[3. John Polster; Discuss/Consider approving the Professional Services Agreement for the Helms Trail Project between Kaufman County and Dannenbaum in the amount of $1,680,492.15.]

NOW, BACK TO ITEM THREE, JOHN POLLSTER DISCUSS, CONSIDER APPROVING THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR HELMS TRAIL PROJECT BETWEEN KAUFMAN COUNTY AND DAN AND MOM, AND THE AMOUNT OF $1,680,492 AND 15 CENTS.

I DON'T, I DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT YEAH, I'M BLOWN AWAY THAT ONE.

THAT'S WHAT IT'S CALLED.

YOU CAN ROUND UP JOHN POLLSTER, INNOVATIVE TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS.

AS YOU KNOW, WHEN I'M HERE, I'M USUALLY ASKING FOR MONEY.

UH, THIS IS THE CONTRACT, UH, PRECINCT TO FOR HELMS TRAIL.

UH, THIS CONTRACT, UH, INCLUDES FEDERAL CLEARANCE PROCESSES WAS WHY IT'S A LITTLE BIT

[00:10:01]

MORE EXPENSIVE THAN JUST A RUN OF THE MILL, UH, PROJECT.

UH, WE HAD 3 MILLION BUDGETED IN THE BOND PACKAGE FOR IT.

THIS IS 1.6 ISH FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE IN THE SCHEMATIC.

UM, AND UH, MY RECOMMENDATION IS WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS CONTRACT.

WE TOOK A LITTLE BIT A WHILE WITH THIS ONE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT, UH, CONSISTENT WITH WHAT TEXTS THAT WE'LL EXPECT TO SEE THROUGH THE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE PROCESS, UH, AND STRUCTURE IT SO THAT IT SAYS, UH, ELIGIBLE AS POSSIBLE FOR FEDERAL FUNDING GOING FORWARD.

SO WE DID A LITTLE BIT OF HOMEWORK HERE.

WE'RE GOING TO SPEND A LITTLE BIT MORE MONEY ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE THAN WE OTHERWISE WOULD, BUT IF WE'RE SUCCESSFUL, THEN WE'LL GET, YOU KNOW, 80 CENTS ON THE DOLLAR FOR CONSTRUCTION AND I'M ALWAYS SUCCESSFUL.

SO WE DON'T HAVE ANY, AND WE DON'T HAVE ANY TIMEFRAME FOR CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT.

DO WE? CAUSE IT'S NOT.

NO, I CAN GIVE YOU ONE.

OKAY.

THAT'S ALL RIGHT.

I'D RATHER NOT KNOW IF IT'S NOT ACCURATE.

SO NO, WAIT, I AM.

SO IT TAKES ABOUT 18 MONTHS TO GET IT CLEARED.

YEP.

CONCURRENT WITH THAT, WE CAN START THE DESIGN.

UH, SO I WOULD SAY TWO YEARS FROM NOW, WE'RE READY TO, IF WE GET THE FUNDING, WE'RE READY TO START REQUIRING RIGHT AWAY AND WHICH WE MAY NOT NEED EXCEPT FOR THE INTERSECTIONS.

AND I'M CERTAIN THERE'S UTILITIES OUT THERE THAT NEED TO BE RELOCATED.

THAT TAKES NINE TO 12 MONTHS.

SO I CAN GIVE YOU A SCHEDULE.

NO, THAT WAS JUST A RANDOM QUESTION, BUT IT BEGINS THE PROCESS SO THAT PEOPLE, WELL, THE REPORT YOU'LL HAVE NOW THAT WE'VE GOT DAN OBAMA ON CONTRACT, WE'LL NOW START TO SHOW, WE CALL THE SANDBOX, WHICH IS WHAT WE ESTIMATE EACH OF THESE PHASES TO TAKE.

AND IT'LL SHOW UP RTL ARE READY TO LET DATE AND THAT'S THE TARGET WE'LL BE SHOOTING FOR TO BEAT.

WELL, I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING THOSE UPDATES ON OUR MONTHLY REPORT.

NO, THAT'S RIGHT.

YOU GET THOSE RIGHT.

ABSOLUTELY.

THERE ON THE WEBSITE.

HE WANTS TO KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON WITH ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND KAUFMAN COUNTY.

THEY CAN LOOK AT THAT REPORT THAT'S POSTED ON THE WEBSITE.

SO MY RECOMMENDATION IS THE COURT CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THIS CONTRACT FOR DAMN BOMB.

ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR JOHN? NO, IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR HELMS TRAIL, FOR DANA TO DAN OBAMA, THE AMOUNT OF 1,000,006 $8,492 AND 15 CENTS.

UH, I'M HAPPY TO MAKE THAT MOTION.

WE HAVE THAT MOTION COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS.

IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND COMMISSIONER BARBER DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE.

AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED NO MOTION CARRIES.

THIS IS JUST A KIND OF A CLEANUP MATTER ITEM

[4. John Polster; Discuss/Consider approving amendment to the interlocal cooperation agreement for the 2019 Terrell Projects between Kaufman County and the City of Terrell in the amount of $6,450,000.00.]

FOR DISCUSS OR APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE INNER LOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR THE 2019 TERRIBLE PROJECTS BETWEEN KAUFMAN COUNTY AND THE CITY, A TERRIBLY AMOUNT OF SIX, 6 MILLION, FOUR 54 AND $50,000.

AND NO SENSE ON THIS ONE.

AND, UM, JOHN DIDN'T REALLY SEE THE NEED.

I MEAN, THIS IS JUST A KIND OF A TECHNICAL MATTER.

WE'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING AS FAR AS MONEY GOES, CHANGE THE MONEY.

IT WAS JUST A COUPLE OF TECHNICAL ISSUES WITH THE CONTRACT THAT WE FELT NEEDED TO BE, UH, MEMORIALIZED BY THE COURT'S APPROVAL.

AND SO IT'S OKAY.

IT WAS JUST NO COST IMPACT FOR THIS MUCH LIVER.

ALL OF THE, ALL OF THESE PROJECTS WERE IN THE FIRST DEGREE AND ALL OF THEM WERE, UH, THE SAME DOLLAR AMOUNTS THAT WERE LISTED IN THE BOND PACKAGE.

AND IT WAS JUST, UH, WE HAD TO MAKE A FEW CHANGES TO SOME OF THE LEGAL EASE THAT EVERYBODY FELT MORE COMFORTABLE WITH QUESTIONS AND, UM, CORRECTED BY YOU REALLY? RIGHT.

IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THAT AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER BARBARA? IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND, SECOND COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE, THOSE OPPOSED.

NO MOTION CARRIES GO A LITTLE

[REMARKS FROM VISITORS; (Any member of the public that wishes to speak on an item that is on this agenda will need to sign in, complete a Public Participation Form, and present to County Clerk prior to court. Speakers will be restricted to a three-minute presentation.)]

SLOWER.

JONATHAN ADAM FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS AND THERE WERE STUFF THAT'S DONE ON THE AGENDA.

HAVE YOU ALREADY DONE THAT? WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY CARDS, BUT YOU'RE WELCOME TO SPEAK IF YOU CARE TO SPEAK FROM THE PUBLIC.

YES.

SO, UH, WHEN WORKING WITH THE FOLKS THAT I WORK WITH IN MY INDUSTRY, ALL OF THE REGIONS ARE GETTING GEARED UP FOR THAT INFRASTRUCTURE BILL.

UH, AND BOTH CONFERENCES HAVE APPROVED EARMARKING FOR THIS NEW PIECE OF LEGISLATION.

SO WE LIKE, I WOULD LIKE TO GET WITH EVERYBODY HERE, PICK THAT ONE BIG MONSTER PROJECT THAT WE KNOW WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET FUNDED ANYTIME SOON.

UH, AND THEN WORK WITH

[00:15:01]

OUR CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION TO HAVE THAT BE ONE OF THE PROJECTS HE'S CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CAN EARMARK UP TO 10.

I'M NOT, THEY'RE NOT SAYING THEY'RE GOING TO GET 10.

UH, BUT I THINK THAT WHOEVER I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH WHO THE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IS HERE, I APOLOGIZE, CONGRESSMAN GOODMAN, WE COULD GET WITH HIM SOON TO, UH, COORDINATE WITH HIS OFFICE ON WHAT WE SUGGEST, BECAUSE I'M SURE HE'S GOT MORE THAN ONE COUNTY IN HIS DISTRICT, A PROJECT THAT HE COULD CONSIDER EARMARKING.

CAUSE IT DOESN'T TAKE ANY MONEY.

IT DOESN'T ADD ANY MONEY.

IT JUST SIMPLY REQUIRES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO TELL THE STAKES, TO TELL THE DISTRICTS, TO FUND THAT PROJECT IN THAT COUNTY.

SO IT JUST BYPASSES ALL OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS PROCESS.

SO EVERYBODY'S DOING IT.

SO I THINK WE OUGHT TO BE ON BOARD.

WELL, OUR TAXPAYERS PAY TAXES JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE.

SO IF THEY'RE GOING TO GO DOWN THAT PATH, THEN WE SHOULD, WE SHOULD TRY TO GET PROJECTS DONE HERE.

YEP.

THANK YOU FOR THAT.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

UH, OKAY.

ITEM

[10. Judge Richards; Discuss/Consider exiting regular meeting and enter an executive session.]

10.

UH, DISCUSS, CONSIDER EXITING REGULAR MEETING AND GOING INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

IS THERE A MOTION TO DO SO I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION WHERE THE MOTION COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS IS HER SECOND I'LL SECOND SEGMENT COMMISSIONER HUNT, DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES.

[11. Executive Session; Pursuant to Section 551.072 of the Texas Government Code, the Commissioners Court will meet in closed session to consult with attorney regarding real estate negotiations.]

WE ARE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION FIVE 51.07 TO THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.

THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS WITH ATTORNEY REGARDING REAL ESTATE NEGOTIATIONS.

SO WE'RE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.

OKAY.

UH, ITEM 12, LOOKING

[12. Judge Richards; Discuss/Consider exiting executive session and enter back into regular meeting.]

FOR A MOTION TO LEAVE EXECUTIVE SESSION AND COME BACK INTO REGULAR MEETING.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION.

WE HAVE MOTION COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS.

IS THERE A SECOND SEGMENT? COMMISSIONER BARBARA DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES, UH, ITEM 13, DISCUSS, CONSIDER ANY ACTION NEEDED AS A RESULT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION.

OF COURSE WE DID NOT TAKE ANY ACTION IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.

I DON'T HEAR ANY MOTIONS FROM THE COURT.

SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM

[14. Auditor; Discuss/Consider line item transfers]

14, WHICH IS DISCUSSED.

CONSIDER LINE ITEM TRANSFERS.

MADAM AUDITOR.

THESE WERE EMAILED TO YOU EARLIER.

YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? NO, MA'AM JUST ONE OF THEM.

IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE A LINE ON OUR TRANSFERS AS, AS SUBMITTED, I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION.

WE HAD A MOTION COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS.

IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND COMMISSIONER HUNT DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE.

OPPOSED.

NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES ITEM 15.

[15. Auditor; Discuss/Consider claims for payment.]

DISCUSS, CONSIDER CLAIMS FOR PAIN.

YOU'RE CALLING THROUGH YOUR PAYMENT OR $824,490 AND 61 CENTS.

A PAYROLL OF 1,000,003 62, 939 93 FOR A TOTAL OF 2 MILLION, $187,430 AND 54 CENTS.

IS THERE ANY QUESTION ON THE, ANY OF THE BILLS? IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AS PRESENTED? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.

WE HAVE A MOTION COMMISSIONER.

BARBARA, IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HUNT.

KATE'S KATE'S THOSE IN FAVOR? SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? NO MOTION CARRIES.

LAST

[16. Adjourn Regular Meeting]

ITEM.

A MAKE MOTION TO ADJOURN.

THIS MEETING COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS BLUE TO ADJOURN THE MEETING.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND, MR. BARBER DISCUSSION THOSE IN FAVOR.

AYE.

AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? NO WE'RE OUT OF HERE.

WAS HE.