[00:00:01]
OKAY, I'D LIKE TO WELCOME EVERYONE HERE THIS MORNING, NOVEMBER THE 18TH.AND WE'RE AT THE, UH, ANNEX AS USUAL, THE COMMISSIONER'S COURTROOM, UH, HERE DOWNTOWN KAUFMAN.
WE'RE GONNA BEGIN THIS MORNING WITH A INVOCATION IN OUR PLEDGES TO THE FLAGS.
IF YOU'D JOIN ME AND STAND, PLEASE PRAY.
AND LORD, THANK YOU FOR OUR FIRST RESPONDERS AND OUR KALIN COUNTY EMPLOYEES.
KEEP US SAFE AND THANK YOU FOR THE BEAUTIFUL WEATHER.
THROUGH THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
TWO TWO REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS.
ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR HONOR UNDER THE TEXAS LEG OF P.
[1. ROUTINE CORRESPONDENCE]
ALRIGHT, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ROUTINE CORRESPONDENCE THIS MORNING? IF NOT, I HAVE ONE.I KNOW SOME OF YOU MAY REMEMBER MAXINE DARST, SHE PASSED AWAY UH, NOVEMBER THE, UH, SEVENTH AT 95 YEARS YOUNG.
SHE WAS THE FIRST FEMALE COUNTY JUDGE OF KAUFFMAN COUNTY.
UH, I WAS BEFORE WITH AN ADOPTION ONCE YEARS AND YEARS AGO.
AND SHE HANDLED THAT, UH, AND JUST WANNA REMEMBER HER AND HER DEDICATION TO THE COUNTY.
AND SHE ALSO SERVED AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE, UH, COUNTY JUDGES COMMISSIONER ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS, WHICH IS, UH, QUITE A FEAT FOR BACK IN THAT DAY.
SO JUST NEED TO HONOR HER AND HER FAMILY.
[2. CONSENT AGENDA]
OKAY.IF NOT, WE MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.
WE HAVE FIVE ITEMS THERE, CONSIDERING EXCEPT THE COMMERCIAL'S COURT REGULAR MEETING FOR NOVEMBER THE FOURTH AND ACCEPT THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER THE 12TH.
APPROVE THE STAR TRANSIT RIDERSHIP REPORT FOR OCTOBER OF 25.
UH, APPROVE THE RENEWAL OF A-V-I-S-P-L SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THREE YEARS TO BE PAID BY THE COUNTY CLERK'S RECORDS AND MANAGEMENT FUNDS.
AND TO DISCUSS AND APPROVE RENEWAL OF, UH, GRAINUS, UH, SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THREE YEARS TO BE PAID BY THE COUNTY CLERK'S.
ANY COMMENTS, QUESTIONS? NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THEM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.
[3. Judge Allen: Discuss/Consider/Approve action regarding Dailas/Fort Worth Foreign Trade Zane 168’s application for Hithium Tech USA Inc. within the jurisdiction of Kaufman County.]
NUMBER THREE, DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE ACTION REGARDING THE DALLAS FORT WORTH FOREIGN TRADE ZONE ONE 60 EIGHTS APPLICATION FOR HYAM TECH SA WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF KAUFMAN COUNTY.NOW, MESQUITE WAS HERE LAST TIME TO PRESENT THIS AND THE GUY FROM, UH, THE FREE TRADE, A FOREIGN TRADE ZONE.
I KNOW IT'S BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION AND I'VE LEFT A MESSAGE, UH, WITH KIM BUTRA FROM THE, UH, MESQUITE EDC TO BE HERE THIS MORNING, BUT I'VE NOT HEARD FROM HER.
SO IF Y'ALL FEEL COMFORTABLE IN DISCUSSING THIS AND MAKING A RULING ON IT, FINE.
IF NOT, WE'LL MOVE IT FORWARD ANOTHER WEEK TO GIVE THEM A CHANCE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS.
I DON'T WANNA PASS ON SOMETHING WHERE THERE'S QUESTIONS WE DON'T UNDERSTAND.
SO WHAT'S YOUR PLEASURE? WELL, I MEAN, I'M NOT SATISFIED WITH IT YET, SO I MEAN, OKAY.
I MEAN THERE'S NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT.
I THINK YOU ALREADY KNOW THAT TERRY.
I'M NOT GOOD COMFORTABLE WITH IT RIGHT NOW, SO IT'D BE PROBABLY BETTER TO TABLE MOVE IT ON AND THEN THEY HAVE TO COME ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS.
SO WE JUST NEED TO TABLE THIS FOR NEXT WEEK AND I'LL MAKE SURE THAT SHE'S HERE.
I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION FOR MR. PHILLIPS MAKES THE MOTION TO HAVE A SECOND.
[4. Sheriff Beavers: Discuss/Consider/Approve the Kaufman County Sheriffs Office Third Quarter Report for 2025.]
UH, NUMBER FIVE, SHERIFF BEAVERS DISCUSS AND APPROVE THE CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE.UH, JUDGE, AS YOU SEE, I'VE SENT THIS FOR THE LAST, UH, THREE MONTHS.
Y'ALL LOOKED AT IT, THERE'S NOTHING REAL ANOMALIES.
I MEAN FAR AS YOU KNOW, OVERALL CAUSE IS DOWN JUST A SMALL BIT AND, YOU KNOW, CRIMES HAPPEN TO BE INVESTIGATED IS DOWN A LITTLE BIT.
ANY DAY, ANY DAY WE'VE GOT MORE POPULATION COMING IN AND YOU KNOW, OUR CALLS FOR SERVICE IS NOT GOING UP.
THE ONE THING I WILL KIND OF NOTE IS IF YOU'LL LOOK ON THE VERY LAST ONE DOWN THERE IN OUR OPENINGS, YOU'LL NOTICE THAT WHEN WE HAVE ONE DEPUTY POSITION OPEN, NINE DETENTION AND OUR COMMUNICATION IS FULL NOW.
SO I APPRECIATE Y'ALL'S HELPING GETTING THAT MOVING FORWARD
[00:05:01]
AND WHAT WE'VE DONE OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS.AND, YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY'S HELP TO GET THE PAY UP.
AND SO I THINK THAT HAS PROVEN BENEFITS FOR ALL OF US TO YOUR WELL, AND WE CAN KEEP FULL STAFF FOR YOU AND YOUR GUYS.
THAT DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE WORKING A LOT OF OVERTIME.
WELL THAT, AND THEN WE'RE NOT ALWAYS CONTINUOUSLY TRAINING, SO THAT'S A GOOD THING.
SO WE'RE SAVING MONEY IF WE CAN GET PEOPLE TO STAY HERE, SO, OH YEAH.
BUT ALL THAT, UNLESS Y'ALL HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT IT, IT'S PRETTY WELL ROUTINE.
ANY, ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR THE SHERIFF? I WILL, UH, WILL SAY THAT AT THE JANUARY 1ST, I'M GONNA HAVE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT LAYOUT HOW IT IS.
IT'S A LITTLE MORE EASIER TO READ AND IT'S KIND OF ALL FLOWING TOGETHER.
SO I'M GOING, I'M GONNA DO THAT AND MAKE IT EASIER FOR YOU.
NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
MR. PHILLIPS MAKES THE MOTION.
[5. Sheriff Beavers: Discuss/Consider/Approve the application for a grant titled Bullet-Resistant Components for Law Enforcement Vehicles, for approximately 46 vehicles for the Sheriff's Office at the grants estimated amount of $470,770.00,]
FIVE, SHERIFF, ONCE AGAIN DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE APPLICATION FOR A GRANT TITLED BULLET RESISTANT COMPONENTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES FOR APPROXIMATELY 46 VEHICLES FOR THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AT THE GRANT'S ESTIMATED COST OF $470,770.ALRIGHT, WELL WE PRESENTED THIS TO YOU.
WE'VE DONE A LITTLE SINCE WE'VE SENT THIS TO YOU, WE'VE DONE A LITTLE RESEARCH AND DONE A LITTLE MORE WORK ON IT.
UH, WHAT WE'LL HAVE TO DO, 'CAUSE YOU KNOW WE DO HAVE LEASE VEHICLES, UH, WE'LL HAVE TO WORK THROUGH THAT.
WE'VE ALREADY WORKED WITH, UH, ENTERPRISE AND WHAT, HOW WE'RE GONNA HANDLE THAT AND WHICH OUR FLEET IS MOSTLY FORDS AND WE'RE PROBABLY LOOKING AT GOING FORDS.
SO WE'RE TRYING TO LEAN THAT AWAY A LITTLE MORE.
'CAUSE THAT'S WHERE WE'RE GETTING OUR BEST LUCK.
AND THEN HAVING MORE OF A FLEET THE SAME WAY MAKES IT A LOT EASIER TO SWAP EQUIPMENT WHERE IT SAVES MORE COUNTY.
SO WHAT OUR INITIAL THOUGHTS NOW WE'VE CHANGED A LITTLE BIT AND I'LL KIND OF GO OVER THAT.
WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS 38 UNITS IS WHAT WE'RE GONNA GO WITH.
UH, AND THE COST WOULD BE ABOUT, UH, 300 OR 397,274.
UH, THAT THAT WILL DO, WE'LL TAKE, WE'RE TAKING OUT EIGHT UNITS, THAT'S THE DODGE DURANGOS, WHICH WE'RE SAVING ABOUT 73,000.
SO IT'S GONNA COST US ABOUT 10,000 454 58 IF WE GET THE GRANT PER CAR.
SO WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS WORKING WITH THEM.
IF WE STORE THE GLASS AS THEY REPLACE IT, WE CAN SAVE US $500 EVERY DEAL.
INSTEAD OF BEING A THOUSAND DOLLARS TO REPLACE THE OME, THEN WE COULD, IF WE PUT THE GLASS ON SITE, WHAT I'M THINKING IS, UH, I CAN BUY THE CONTAINER THROUGH ASSET FORFEITURE AND PUT ALL THE GLASS IN IT AND HANG ONTO IT.
AND THEN WHEN WE SWAP THAT AROUND, IT'LL SAVE US $500 FOR EVERY CAR.
SO THAT'S A PRETTY GOOD SAVINGS IN THAT ASPECT OF IT.
UH, AND THEN WE'LL GET, AND WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT DOING UH, GLASS ON THE FRONT AND THE SIDES SO, AND THE DOOR PANEL.
SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT.
SO, YOU KNOW, WHILE WE'RE ASKING HIS PERMISSION TO GO AHEAD AND TRY TO GET THIS GRANT, NOT GUARANTEED IT, BUT WE'RE LOOKING AT, I MEAN IT'S ONLY $5 MILLION SO I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH THEY'RE GONNA GIVE IT.
'CAUSE I IMAGINE EVERYBODY'S ASKING FOR IT, I'M SURE IN, IN THE STATE.
SO, BUT WE DON'T ASK, WE NEVER GIVE IT.
I DON'T MIND BEING TOLD NO, BUT I CAN'T BE TOLD NO UNLESS I TRY YEAH.
IT TO HELP PROTECT THE OFFICERS THEN THAT'S WHAT WE NEED TO DO.
SO, BUT WE KIND OF CHANGED THAT UP A LITTLE BIT, TRYING TO GET IT MORE REASONABLE TO FIT IN THE GROUP OF EVERYBODY.
SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO.
AND ONCE AGAIN, THE LIFESPAN OF UH, GLASS IS ABOUT FIVE YEARS, SO IT IS A LIFESPAN ON IT ALSO, IF THAT'S WHAT WE'RE ASKING Y'ALL'S APPROVAL TO ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? I THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA AND I'M HOPEFULLY WE, UH, UH, CAN GET, GET THE GRANT.
AND LIKE I SAY, IF WE, IF THEY ONLY FUND SO MUCH, THAT'S SO MUCH AND WE'LL, WE'LL TAKE WHAT WE GET.
YEAH, WE'LL GET WHAT WE CAN GET BECAUSE LIKE I SAY, WE'VE GOT THE ARMOR DEAL, BUT WE'D HAVE ONE ARMOR, WE, IF WE CAN PUT ONE ON EVERY SHIFT, THAT'S SOMETHING WE CAN DO THAT BEFORE THE BEARCAT OR SOMETHING ELSE GET THERE THAT WE'D HAVE SOME ARMOR THERE.
WE NEED TO PROTECT OUR OFFICERS NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE.
LET'S SAY SECOND AT THE SAME THING.
ALRIGHT, ALL JUDGE MR. LANE MAKES THE FIRST MR. MOORE SECOND.
ALL IN FAVOR? THE AYE A MOTION.
[6. Shannon Roden: Discuss/Consider/Approve the replat of Lot 2 in Meadowbrook Acres in Precinct 1.]
OKAY, MS. SHANNON, DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE REPL OF LOT TWO AND MEADOWBROOK ACRES IN PRECINCT ONE MORNING MS. SHANNON.UH, SO SOME OF YOU MAY REMEMBER THIS PLAT FROM LAST YEAR, UH, WE HAD THIS RELA ON THE AGENDA AND RIGHT BEFORE WE HAD COURT, UH, WE RECEIVED AN EMAIL FROM ONE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT THERE WERE RESTRICTIONS THAT YOU COULD NOT FURTHER SUBDIVIDE THESE LOTS WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION.
SO THE PROPERTY OWNER WORKED WITH THE, UM, SOME OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS AND WE DID RECEIVE AMENDED RESTRICTIONS SPECIFICALLY FOR LOT TWO AND WE SENT THAT TO LEGAL FOR REVIEW AND WE WERE ADVISED THAT WE COULD PROCEED WITH THE RELA REVIEW FOR LOT TWO.
SO WE DID REQUIRE ANOTHER REVIEW BECAUSE THE PLAT WAS DENIED
[00:10:01]
LAST YEAR.AND IT DID MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN OUR REGULATIONS.
UM, SO WE'RE HERE TODAY TO GET THE COURT'S APPROVAL.
SO WHAT SIZE ARE THESE LOTS? THEY'RE ONE AND A HALF ACRES EACH.
WE HAD TWO PEOPLE SIGN UP WHO WANTED TO SPEAK TO THIS ISSUE.
DO Y'ALL HAVE ANY, DO Y'ALL WANT TO SPEAK? WE HAVE, UH, MICHAEL MARTIN, THAT'S ME.
IF YOU'LL COME FORWARD, GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND THEN IS THAT LINK THOMPSON? YES SIR.
IF YOU, DO YOU WANNA SPEAK ALSO? YES SIR.
UM, 9 7 51 MEADOWBROOK CIRCLE.
I LIVE IN THAT MEADOWBROOK ACRES.
UM, I GOT 5.2 ACRES RIGHT THERE IN THE CORNER.
UM, WHEN I MOVED THERE I TRIED TO PUT ANOTHER HOUSE IN THE BACK FOR MY MOTHER-IN-LAW AND I WASN'T ALLOWED TO BECAUSE OF THE RESTRICTIONS, SO WE JUST MOVED ON.
BUT I MEAN, AS FAR AS ALL THIS GOING RIGHT NOW, I MEAN THEY'RE TRYING TO PUT FIVE HOUSES ACROSS THE STREET FROM US AND THEY'RE ONLY ALLOWED, UM, ONE, ONE S PER FIVE ACRES IS WHAT ALL, ALL OF OUR PAPERWORK SAYS.
SO THAT'S THE RESTRICTIONS ON YOUR, ON THE PROPERTY? YEAH.
SO THAT'S WHY WE NEVER DID IT.
AND I COULD HAVE BOUGHT ALL THAT LAND WAS ONLY LIKE 320,000 ACROSS FROM ME AND I COULD BE DOING THE SAME THING.
BUT WE LIVED THERE SO LONG, I'VE BEEN THERE 22 YEARS AND PEOPLE HAVE TRIED TO COME IN AND DO THE SAME THING AND THEY GET DENIED BY EVERYBODY IN THE, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
SO, I MEAN, I KNOW THE TAXES GO UP AND I KNOW IT'S BENEFICIAL, WHATEVER, BUT IT'S STILL GONNA BE, YOU KNOW, NOT RIGHT IN, IN MY OPINION AS FAR AS, YOU KNOW, WHERE I LIVE AND WHERE THEY'RE GONNA PLACE ALL THEM HOUSES.
IF THEY PLACED THE ONE ON EACH FIVE ACRES LIKE WE'VE ALL DONE, THEN IT'S FINE.
I'M, I'M NOT, I'M NOT GRIPING HER ABOUT ANY OF IT, BUT WHEN THEY WANNA BUILD MORE THAN ONE ON THE FIVE ACRES OR WHATEVER THE PLOT IS, I DON'T, I DON'T, I DON'T AGREE WITH THAT AT ALL.
AND MY TAXES HAVE BEEN BASICALLY THE SAME.
THEY GO UP EVERY NOW AND THEN, BUT I MEAN THERE'S, I MEAN I DON'T WANNA BE PAYING 10, $20,000.
NO, YOU KNOW, RIGHT THERE ANYWAY IF THEY, YOU KNOW, HOWEVER MUCH THOSE HOUSES EVEN SELL FOR, I DON'T KNOW NONE OF THAT.
BUT THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT I GOTTA SAY BECAUSE I DON'T, I REALLY JUST DON'T THINK IT'S RIGHT BECAUSE WE COULDN'T DO IT WHEN THE NEIGHBORHOOD TURNED US ALL DOWN AND THEN NOW THEY'RE COMING IN AND TRY TO REPL IT AND BUILD FIVE MORE HOUSES.
SO I GUESS THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS HAD A CHANGE OF HEART THEN TO ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN.
I'M NOT SURE HOW MANY, IS IT JUST THE PEOPLE WOULD'VE TO SAY HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE MAJORITY VOTE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD, LET HER LOOK AT IT.
I JUST GAVE HER THE AMENDED RESTRICTIONS THAT'S IN THE PACKET THAT YOU ALL SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED AS WELL.
OH WELL, WELL SHE SAID, SHE SAID HOLD ON, HOLD ON.
YOU HAVE TO ADDRESS THE COURT.
DO WE HAVE THE MAJORITY, DO WE HAVE A MAJORITY? I BELIEVE THERE, THERE'S SEVERAL AFFIDAVITS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO THOSE RESTRICTIONS AND BASED ON THE REVIEW THAT THAT WAS DONE BACK IN SEPTEMBER, UM, WHEN WE WERE PROVIDED WITH THOSE, UH, THE AMENDED RESTRICTIONS, OH WAIT, WAIT, YOU'RE NOT SPEAKING IN THE MICROPHONE.
AND I DID SEND THOSE TO, UH, LEGAL AND I GAVE YOU THE RESPONSE THAT WAS RECEIVED BASED ON THAT RESPONSE IS WHAT ALLOWED US TO MOVE FORWARD.
SO I WOULD ASSUME IT WAS THE MAJORITY.
I'M, I'M NOT, I'M NOT LEGAL SO I'M NOT ONE TO INTERPRET THAT TO, TO ME, IF, IF, UM, IF THIS IS SOMETHING THAT, UM, THAT WE HAVE A DISPUTE WHERE THE DOCUMENTATION SAYS MAJORITY, BUT YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU DID NOT SIGN AN AFFIDAVIT AND YOU'RE A PART OF THE SUBDIVISION, I THINK IT WOULD BE BETTER TO PASS AND BE BE SURE.
MAKE SURE WE HAVE THE TRUE MAJORITY AS UH, EXACTLY.
AND IF YOU WILL LEAVE YOUR NAME AND NUMBER WITH MS. RODIN, UM, I WILL BE IN TOUCH.
I'M A CIVIL ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY, BUT I I I HAVE THAT I WOULD RATHER BE A HUNDRED PERCENT 'CAUSE WE DON'T WANNA HAVE ANYTHING THAT'S NOT ACCURATE.
[00:15:01]
UH, SOME OF THE PEOPLE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ARE JUST RENTERS.SO THE OWNERS, HOW DOES THAT WORK? I MEAN, I'M SORRY.
SOME OF THE PEOPLE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ARE JUST RENTERS, YOU KNOW, SO THE, SO LIKE SOME PEOPLE LIVE IN CALIFORNIA THAT OWN THE PROPERTIES AND OTHERWISE RIGHT.
AND IT, HOW WOULD THEY BE? BE IT HAS TO BE OWNERS.
SO HAS IT EVER BEEN SUBDIVIDED BEFORE IN THERE ALREADY? NO.
JUST ASKING BECAUSE NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE.
I WAS JUST ASKING, YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT FIVE HOUSES, SOMEBODY BUILT FIVE HOUSES ACROSS FROM YOU OR SOMETHING.
IF I CAN ELABORATE A LITTLE BIT ON THAT.
WHEN WE FIRST GOT THE REQUEST, UM, FOR THIS REPL, THERE WERE THREE LOTS INVOLVED, BUT IT ENDED UP ONLY BEING LOT TWO THAT IS SUBDIVIDED LOTS.
I BELIEVE IT WAS, WAS IT THREE AND FOUR AND FOUR? TWO, THREE AND FOUR, CORRECT.
THREE AND FOUR HAVE STAYED WHOLE.
SO HE'S ONLY SUBDIVIDING LOT TWO.
AND THESE AMENDED RESTRICTIONS ARE SPECIFICALLY FOR LOT TWO.
IT SAYS IN THAT PAPERWORK THAT IT'S ONLY FOR LOT TWO, BUT WE CAN ALWAYS SEE HOW THIS, THE DOMINO'S GONNA FALL IF, IF ONE LOT GOES AND HERE GOES THE OTHER TWO.
SO, ALRIGHT, WELL LET, LET'S PASS ON THIS.
AND COME BACK AT A LATER TIME.
I CAN COME IN THERE AND PUT AN RV PARK IF THEY'RE GONNA LET 'EM DO THAT.
YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? I MEAN, AND, AND JUST TO BE CLEAR, WE RELY ON THE INFORMATION THAT WE ARE GIVEN BUT WHEN THERE'S INFORMATION THAT DISPUTES IT OR MIGHT BE IN QUESTION, WE WILL REVISIT, REWORK AND JUST MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE LEGALLY CORRECT WHEN THIS GOES THROUGH.
SO IF YOU'LL GIVE YOUR INFORMATION TO MS. RHODEN, WE'LL BE IN TOUCH AND SET UP A MEETING.
IS THAT OKAY WITH YOU? DID YOU FILL OUT A SHEET? SHEET? YES MA'AM.
THEY GOT A FOLLOW PHONE NUMBER.
WHAT'S YOUR NAME AGAIN? WE WILL, WE WILL GET AHOLD OF YOU ALSO.
WHAT WATER ARE YOU IN WITH HIM? YOUR INFORMATION? I HAVE IT.
WHAT'S YOUR PHONE Y'ALL? I HAVE THE INFORMATION.
IF ANY ANYBODY ELSE IS THERE ON THE SAME SUBJECT, YOU, YOU CAN FILL OUT THE THING.
SO WE'LL HAVE YOUR INFORMATION GET NOTIFIED.
I'VE UNDERSTOOD THERE'S A LOT OF DO YOU IT FOR ME? YOU CAN EMAIL ME.
YEAH, WELL, WE'LL SORT IT OUT AND SEE WHAT WE CAN DO.
SO ON NUMBER 60, NEED A MOTION TO COME BACK AT THIS AT A LATER DATE WHEN WE HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION DENIED AT THE TIME.
WE'RE GONNA DENY IT RIGHT NOW.
COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS MADE THE MOTION.
COMMISSIONER MOORE MADE THE SECOND.
UNTIL THEY PROVED SKE AND TOMMY? YES.
[7. Shannon Roden: Discuss/Consider/Approve the final plat of 4009 Estates located on CR 4009 in Precinct 4.]
NUMBER SEVEN, SHANNON AGAIN, DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF 40 0 0 9 ESTATES LOCATED ON COUNTY ROAD 4 0 0 9 IN PRECINCT FOUR.OKAY, SO THIS OWNER IS TAKING 12 ACRES OF THEIR 40 ACRE PROPERTY AND SPLITTING IT INTO TWO LOTS, ROUGHLY SIX ACRES EACH.
IT'S MET ALL THE REQUIRED APPROVALS AND ALL OF THAT IS IN THE PACKET.
COMMISSIONER MOORE, I'LL MAKE THE MOTION.
MR. MOORE MAKES THE MOTION TO APPROVE COMMISSIONER LANE.
[8. Fabi Carritle: Discuss/Consider/Approve the fina! plat for Jaimes Terrones Estates Located on County Road 4027 in Precinct 4.]
DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR JAMES TER ESTATES LOCATED ON CAN ROAD 40 27 IN PRECINCT FOUR.MS. S STATES IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR ACRES.
UH, THE OWNER IS SPLITTING INTO TWO LOTS, RANGING FROM 1.1 TO 2.5 ACRES.
ALL THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION IS INCLUDED IN THE AGENDA PACKET AND WE'RE JUST HERE ASKING FOR YOUR APPROVAL.
MR. MOORE MAKES THE MOTION TO HAVE A SECOND.
[9, Felicia Jackson: Discuss/Consider/Approve the award of RFP 2025-007 Solid Waste & Recycling Services to Blackjack Disposal.]
OKAY, MS. FELICIA, DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE AWARD OF RFP 20 25 0 0 7 SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES TO BLACK JACK DISPOSAL.SO AFTER REVIEWING THE PROPOSAL AND THE NEGOTIATION AND THE COST IMPACTS, MY RECOMMENDATIONS IS TO MOVE FORWARD WITH APPROVING BLACKJACK DISPOSAL CONTRACT.
ANY COMMENTS, QUESTIONS PER FELICIA NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.
[10. Monique Hunter: Discuss/Consider/Approve a month to month contract with NewEdge Services LLC for 911/GIS services,]
MS. MONIQUE, YOUR TURN MY TURN.DISCUSS, CONSIDER AND APPROVE A MONTH TO MONTH CONTRACT WITH NEW EDGE SERVICES.
SO I JUST WANT TO UM, UH, ENLIST THE HELP OF NEW EDGE
[00:20:01]
TO JUST KIND OF HOST OUR ESRI INTO THE CLOUD AND UM, I HAVE THE MONEY WITHIN MY BUDGET AND I WOULD JUST NEED PERMISSION TO DO THAT.ESPECIALLY YOU HAVE THE MONEY.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR HER? NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE? I MAKE A MOTION.
COMMISSIONER PHIS MADE A SECOND.
[11. Commissioner Phillips: Discuss/Consider/Approve the funding for Precinct 2 Purchase Order for Helms Trail in the amount of $54,600.00.]
PHILLIPS DISCUSSED CONSIDERING AND APPROVE THE FUNDING FOR PRECINCT TWO PURCHASE ORDER OF HAMS TRAIL ON THE AMOUNT OF $54,600.YEAH, THAT'S JUST, WE USE THE BOND MONEY FOR IT.
OKAY, WE'RE JUST SENDING IT TO POSTER.
MR. FIFTH MADE A MOTION TO HAVE A SECOND.
[12. Auditor: Discuss/Consider line item and budget transfers/corrections.]
LINE ITEM BUDGET TRANSFERS.SO WE HAVE SEVERAL LINE ITEM TRANSFERS AND BUDGET AMENDMENTS THIS WEEK.
UM, MOST OF THEM ARE TO RECORD SOME GRANT REVENUE THAT'S COME IN AND A FEW ROUTINE LINE ITEM TRANSFERS.
AND WE ASK FOR THE COURT'S APPROVAL.
Y'ALL ALL RECEIVED THOSE? HAD TIME TO LOOK AT 'EM.
COMMISSIONER MOORE MAKES THE MOTION.
COMMISSIONER LANE MAKES A SECOND.
[13. Auditor: Discuss/Consider claims for payment and/or Financial Information as provided by the County Auditor.]
MR. AUDITOR ONCE AGAIN, CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT OR OTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED.SO THIS WEEK WE HAVE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE INVOICES, MOSTLY MADE UP OF EMPLOYEE SAVINGS, DISTRIBUTION AND COUNTY ROAD EXPENDITURES.
AND THEN WE ALSO HAD A PAYROLL, A REGULAR PAYROLL.
UM, AND WE ASKED FOR THE COURT'S APPROVAL.
ANY QUESTIONS? FURROWING ANYTHING? BILLS? NOPE.
NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
MR. LANE MAKES THE MOTION TO HAVE A SECOND.
[14. Judge Allen: Discuss/Consider exiting regular meeting and entering into executive session: A. Pursuant to Texas Government Code Sections 551.0761 and 551.089 to discuss Kaufman County's network security and infrastructure and security incident.]
14 IS MINE.DISCUSS, CONSIDER ENTERING, EXITING REGULAR MEETING AND ENTER TO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO TEXAS COVENANT GOLD.
5 5 1 0.0761 AND 5 5 1 0.089 TO DISCUSS KAUFFMAN COUNTY'S NETWORK SECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE AND SECURITY.
INSTANT IT IS 9 21 TO HAVE A MOTION.
MR. PHILLIPS MAKES THE MOTION TO HAVE A SECOND.
I'LL SECOND MR. GOLD, MAKE A SECOND.