* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:04] THIS REGULAR MEETING [Call to Order] OF THE KAUFMAN COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S COURT IS CALLED TO ORDER. IT'S TUESDAY, MARCH 24TH, 2020. IT IS 9:25 AM WE'RE IN THE, UH, COURT MEETING ROOM IN THE COURTHOUSE ANNEX. UM, I THINK WE'LL DISPENSE WITH THE FORMALITY SINCE THERE'S JUST A SMALL GROUP IN HERE. MMM. AT SOME POINT, UH, SHERIFF, I THINK WE'LL GET THROUGH SOME OF THIS AGENDA AND THEN IF YOU COULD ASK THE BAILIFFS, ARE YOU GONNA Y'ALL COULD CHECK AND SEE WHETHER OR NOT THERE'S SOMEBODY WHO UH, CARES TO ADDRESS THE COURT, WE'D BE SURE AND DO THAT BEFORE THE END OF THE MEETING. SO I MEAN BY HAVING A ROUTINE CORRESPONDENCE. NEXT [2. CONSENT AGENDA] ITEM. CONSENT AGENDA. WE HAVE A, A PLETHORA OF REPORTS THAT ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET. UH, ANYONE CARE TO DISCUSS ANY PARTICULAR ONE OF THESE REPORTS? NO. UH, I THINK I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED IS OUR SECOND SECOND. COMMISSIONER BARBER DISCUSSION. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? NO. MOTION CARRIES. NEXT UP, [3. Laura Hughes: Discuss/Consider entering into a Contract with VitalChek for online County Clerk Vital Records Request.] OUR COUNTY CLERK DISCUSS. CONSIDER ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT WITH VITAL CHECK FOR ONLINE COUNTY CLERK VITAL RECORDS REQUESTS. WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS BOTTLE CHECK IS A A SERVICE THAT PROVIDED KAUFMAN COUNTY RESIDENTS A SECURE ONLINE SERVICE WHICH EXPEDITES THE DELIVERY OF REQUESTS FOR VITAL RECORDS. IT PROVIDES IDENTITY VERIFICATION THROUGH THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AND IT PROVIDES LEVEL ONE PCI COMPLIANT PAYMENT PROCESSING. THERE'S A NUMBER OF BENEFITS. IT INCREASES THE OPTIONS FOR THE PUBLIC TO BE ABLE TO GET THEIR VITAL RECORDS. IT REDUCES THE FACE TO FACE INTERACTION THAT WE HAVE IN THE OFFICE AND IT ALSO REDUCES THAT WORKLOAD BECAUSE THEY TAKE THE APPLICATIONS, VERIFY THE IDENTIFICATION AND THEY PAYMENT PROCESS THE PAYMENTS. THERE'S NO COST TO THE COUNTY. WE GET ALL THE APPLES, WE GET ALL THE EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES THAT ARE NEEDED. IT REV GENERATES REVENUE BECAUSE IT'S IN 48 STATES, SO ANYBODY THAT REQUESTS A COP AND COUNTY BIRTH CERTIFICATE WHO WILL COME TO US RATHER THAN THE STATE AND THEY ARE IN MOST LARGE TEXAS COUNTIES AND CITIES. DALLAS, TARA BEAR, EL PASO, DENTON COUNTY, AND WE ARE JUST ASKING THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT TO APPROVE THIS CONTRACT. OKAY. IT'S NO COST TO THE COUNTY AND THEN ANY, ANY MONEY THAT THEY COLLECT WILL BE SENT TO US. SAME DAY. QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT? IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION TO AUTHORIZE ENTERING INTO THAT CONTRACT WITH VIDA CHECK? I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION. MOTION. COMMISSIONER HUNT, IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND. COMMISSIONER. MR KATE'S DISCUSSION. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES, UH, THIS ITEM, [4. Judge Richards: Discuss/Consider matters concerning elections] THIS NEXT ITEM, ITEM FOUR IS LISTED AS DISCUSSED, CONSIDER MATTER CONCERNING ELECTIONS. MMM. THIS IS A, HAS TO DO WITH THE MOVING OF THE ELECTION DATE. AS YOU KNOW, THE GOVERNOR HAS, UH, HAS TAKEN ACTION THAT ALLOWS FOR US TO NOT HOLD ELECTIONS AS PLANNED ON MAY 2ND, WE COULD MOVE THOSE ELECTIONS TO NOVEMBER THE THIRD. UM, AND IT LEAVES EVERYTHING IN PLACE JUST LIKE IT WOULDN'T BE FOR THE, THE MAY 2ND ELECTION. AS FAR AS WE KNOW THAT, YOU KNOW, EACH, WE DO ELECTIONS FOR ALL OF OUR JURISDICTIONS IN THE COUNTY. UH, AS FAR AS WE KNOW, NONE OF OUR, NONE OF ANY OF THESE JURISDICTIONS, UH, ARE GOING TO TRY TO HOLD THEIR OWN ELECTION. LIKE, CERTAINLY DO THAT IF THEY WANTED TO, BUT UM, SO WHAT IS BEFORE US IS, IS THIS A COURT ORDER THAT MOVES ELECTIONS FROM MAY 2ND TO NOVEMBER THE THIRD? I, I'M ASSUMING YOU GUYS ARE ALL PRETTY FAMILIAR WITH THIS. OKAY. THEN A CALL FOR A MOTION. UH, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS, UH, ORDER, UH, ELECTIONS POSTPONING FROM MAY 2ND UNTIL NOVEMBER THE THIRD. IT'S NOT THE, UH, THAT'S NOT THE RUNOFF LIKES TO KNOW NOT TO RUN OFF. YEAH, WHATEVER WAS SCHEDULED FOR MY SECOND WOULD YOU MIGHT MOVE TO NOVEMBER 3RD JUDGE, THIS ORDER THAT YOU GUYS HAVE IN YOUR PACKET IS TO MOVE THE RUNOFF TO THE JULY 14TH DATE. [00:05:01] I MAN, I'M SORRY. JULY. YEAH. JULY 14TH TO 2020 FIRST IS THE MAY 2ND ELECTIONS BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE DONE BY THE INDEPENDENT JURISDICTIONS. WE'VE ALREADY PASSED THE NICE SECOND LAST WEEK AT THE EMERGENCY. UH, WHY AM I SAYING MAY 2ND AND NOVEMBER 3RD THEN IN THIS ORDER? IT SHOULD BE, I DON'T KNOW. YEAH, YOU CAN COME AND LOOK AT IT. ME TWO ELECTION ORDERS. THERE IS THE ORDER FOR THE COUNTY ELECTIONS THAT SHOULD BE POSTPONED UNTIL NOVEMBER. THE THIRD, I BELIEVE IT IS ANY, UM, COUNTY ELECTIONS OR, UM, ELECTIONS THAT THE COUNTY RUNS. THAT'S THE FIRST ORDER THAT SHOULD BE POSTPONED UNTIL NOVEMBER 3RD. AND THAT IS BASED ON GOVERNOR ABBOTT'S DECLARATION AND IT'S BASED ON THE ADVISORY THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE SENT TO, UM, EACH COUNTY AND, AND TO UM, POSTPONE THOSE ELECTIONS BASED ON WHAT GOVERNOR ABBOTT PROCLAIMED AND THAT ORDER SETS FOR THE IMPORTANT ELECTION DATES SUCH AS EARLY VOTING AND, UM, AND, AND VARIOUS GUIDELINES AT THE SECRETARY OF STATE, UM, HAD US GO BY. SO THAT'S, THAT'S THE FIRST ELECTIONS ORDER THAT SHOULDN'T BE PASSED IS, UM, POSTPONING THOSE COUNTY ELECTIONS UNTIL NOVEMBER 3RD. AND THEN THE SECOND ORDER IS WHERE THE GOVERNOR ON MONDAY OR FRIDAY ISSUED A PROCLAMATION THAT THE PRIMARY RUNOFF ELECTIONS, THAT THOSE WOULD BE POSTPONED FROM MAY 26TH UNTIL NOVEMBER 14TH. AND HE, I'M SORRY, JULY 14TH, SORRY, A LITTLE LATE FOR THE YEAR, BUT UNTIL JULY 14TH. AND SO ANY DATES THAT THAT GO WITH THAT SUCH AS EARLY VOTING ARE INCLUDED IN THE ORDER THAT THOSE ARE THE TWO ELECTIONS ORDERS THAT WE WOULD LIKE FOR YOU ON A PATH START EARLY VOTING, CORRECT? CORRECT. THE RIGHT ORDER FOR AMBULANCE. AMBLESIDE YES, WE HAVE THE RIGHT. YES. BUT THAT'S, BUT THAT'S THE BASIC DESCRIPTION OF THOSE ORDERS. THOSE TWO ORDERS. AND THEY'RE TWO SEPARATE ORDERS BECAUSE THEY'RE TWO SEPARATE SERIES OF ELECTIONS AND TWO SEPARATE GOVERNOR, GOVERNOR PROCLAMATIONS. OKAY. SO WE PASS THE, WE PASS THE MAY THE ORDER CHANGING THE MALE ELECTIONS. LAST TIME WE DID. NO, I DON'T THINK SO. OKAY. WE DISCUSSED IT BUT WE DIDN'T HAVE THE DATES AND I GUESS THE STATE SET THE DATE. SO ACTUALLY WHAT'S IN, WHAT'S ON THE AGENDA? I THINK WE'RE GOOD CAUSE WHAT'S ONLY AGENDA IS DISCUSSED, CONSIDER MATTERS CONCERNING ELECTIONS. SO THAT WOULD COVER BOTH OF THESE ITEMS. UH, SO, UM, I WOULD MAKE A MOTION THAT, UH, I WOULD MAKE A MOTION THAT THE COURT APPROVE AN ORDER. IT WOULD MOVE THE DATE OF THE MAY 2ND ELECTIONS HELD BY THE COUNTY TO NOVEMBER THE THIRD OF 2020 AND THAT THE COURT WOULD, UH, ORDER THAT THE ELECTIONS, THE PRIMARY RUNOFF ELECTION CONDUCTED BY THE COUNTY WOULD BE MOVED FROM MAY 26 TO JULY, 1420 16 JULY 14 14TH 14TH. THAT SUFFICIENT MOTION REBECCA, I BELIEVE THAT SHOULD DO IT. OKAY. SO THAT'S THE MOTION IS OUR SECOND SECOND THAT WE'LL HAVE A SECOND FROM PHILLIPS DISCUSSION. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, THOSE OPPOSED? NO. MOTION CARRIES. [5. Judge Richards: Discuss/Consider extending Kaufman County's Declaration of Local Disaster for Public Health Emergency] NEXT ITEM IS AN ITEM WE NEED TO PASS. THIS IS ITEM FIVE WHICH IS DISCUSSED CONSIDERED EXTENDING KAUFMAN COUNTY'S DECLARATION OF LOCAL DISASTER FOR PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY. WE NEED TO JUST PASS THAT BECAUSE THAT'S AN ITEM THAT WE WERE ON IS ON OUR AGENDA THAT WE, THAT WILL BE, WE'LL BE COMING BACK TO RECONVENING THAT EIGHT 30 MEETING. SO UNLESS SOMEBODY HAS OBJECTION, WE'LL PASS THAT ITEM. [6. Discuss/Consider approving the 2020 Kaufman County Investment Policy,] ITEM SIX, DISCUSS, CONSIDER APPROVING THE 2020 COFFIN COUNTY INVESTMENT POLICY. UH, YOU'VE BEEN PROVIDED THAT, UH, INVESTMENT POLICY BY THE TREASURER. I OF COURSE ASKED THE TREASURER IF YOU COULD JUST PROVIDE THAT IN WRITING. THERE'S NO STATUTORY REQUIREMENT THAT HE PRESENT ON THAT MATTER. QUESTIONS OR ANYTHING? NO. THEN IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE 2020 COFFIN COUNTY INVESTMENT POLICY HAS PRESENTED A MAKE A MOTION? WE HAVE THAT MOTION. COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND WERE COMMISSIONER BARBER [00:10:01] DISCUSSION. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. [7. Karen Badgley; Discuss/Consider entering into a contract for professional services agreement between Kaufman County and Allison, Bass & Magee, LLP,] NEXT UP, KAREN BADGLEY DISCUSSED CONSIDER ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN KAUFMAN COUNTY AND ALISON BASS. AND SO WHAT WE'RE ASKING THE COURT TO APPROVE IS A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR ALISON BESS AND MCGEE. AND THIS WOULD ALLOW THE CIVIL ATTORNEYS TO, UM, TO BE ABLE TO, UM, USE SOME OF THE SERVICES OF ALISON BESS AND MCGEE. UM, PURSUANT TO THIS CONTRACT. YOU'VE ALL GOT THAT IN YOUR PACKET? YUP. UM, OKAY. YOU CAN GET THAT MUCH FOR TRAVELING. QUESTIONS OTHER THAN STATEMENTS, QUESTIONS? UH, IS THERE A MOTION, THE MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CIVIL ATTORNEYS TO ENTER INTO THAT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH, UH, ALISON BASIL MCGEE? OH MY GOODNESS. WE HAVE THAT MOTION. COMMISSIONER BARBARA, IS THERE A SECOND? OH, SECOND. SECOND. COMMISSIONER HUNT. DISCUSSION. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES. [8. Raylan Smith: Discuss and consider permission to solicit RFQ 20-14: 2019 Kaufman County Bond Program - Consulting Engineering Services - ROAD, BRIDGE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT] WOULD YOU ASK A, I GUESS I CAN SAY BAYLOR. FINE. WOULD YOU ASK A RAELYNN THAT SHE COULD COME IN AND KAREN, THANK YOU. . GOOD MORNING. OKAY. ARE WE ON MY OWN LINE? WE'RE READY FOR ME. WE'RE ON ITEM EIGHT ON THE AGENDA, WHICH IS THE RFQ 2014 FOR CONSULTING. THIS WOULD BE AN RFQ TO BE RELEASED FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES. I'M ALSO GOING TO GO AHEAD AND WRAP IN GEO TECH AND THE MATERIALS TESTING BECAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE THOSE ARE THE OTHER TWO SERVICES, UM, THAT WE'RE GOING TO NEED FOR COUNTY ROADS FOR THE BOND PROGRAM MOVING FORWARD. SO THIS WOULD BE THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT. THIS WOULD BE THE ACTUAL, UM, TASKS THAT COULD BE ASSIGNED FOR THE COUNTY ROADS THAT NEED ENGINEERING. MY MAIN QUESTION TO YOU IS DO YOU WANT, UM, SOMEONE TO OVERSEE ALL PROJECTS AND HAVE IT BE THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT OR DO YOU WANT JUST ENGINEERING SERVICES ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS BECAUSE THAT IS GOING TO AFFECT THE NEGOTIATIONS AND HOW THE CONTRACT READS? SO ASK THE QUESTION AGAIN. SO, UM, THERE, THERE IS AN ENGINEERING FIRM WHO THEY GENERALLY WORK AS LIKE THE PROGRAM MANAGER AND THEY WOULD OVERSEE ALL OF THE COUNTY ROAD PROJECTS, DURATION OF THE BOND ISSUE. SO IT WOULD BE AN EXTENDED YEAR CONTRACT WITH RENEWALS OBVIOUSLY. UM, I'M JUST TRYING TO MAKE SURE, I KNOW IN THE RFQ ARE YOU GOING TO WANT SOMEONE TO OVERSEE THIS WHOLE PRO PROGRAM OR ARE YOU ONLY LOOKING FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE ROADS THAT YOU DEEM THAT YOU NEED ENGINEERING ON? WASN'T THAT GOING TO BE ONE OF THE JOB DUTIES OF RON SOLAR OR A NEW ENGINEER TO OVERSEE THESE PROJECTS FOR US AND THEN WHEN WE DISCUSSED, CERTAINLY, YEAH. UM, OF COURSE. I MEAN HE'LL NEED SOME RESOURCES CAUSE HE DOESN'T HAVE A LOT OF THE CAPABILITIES HERE TO DO A LOT OF HIS. SO HE'LL HAVE TO BE ABLE TO COMMUNICATION WITH SOME ENGINEERING FIRM THAT CAN DO ALL THAT. BUT AS FAR AS THE DAY TO DAY MANAGEMENT, MAKING SURE THE INSPECTIONS GET DONE, MAKING SURE THE CONTRACTORS ARE DOING WHAT THEY NEED TO DO. YEAH I THINK WE ALL GO DO THAT IN HOUSE. I DON'T THINK SO UNLESS SOMEONE SEES SOMETHING DIFFERENT. I THINK THE QUESTION THAT RAYLAN'S IS ASKING IS DO YOU WANT UH, YEAH. DO WE WANT TO DO, DO WE WANT TO JUST BECAUSE WE GET A PROPOSAL FROM, WELL I GUESS WE HAD A PROPOSAL FROM SOMEBODY, WHETHER THE COMMISSIONERS WANT TO DO IT ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS FOR WHATEVER ENGINEERING SERVICES YOU WANT. OR DO YOU WANT IN ADDITION TO WHAT RON WOULD BE ABLE TO PROVIDE, DO YOU WANT TO DO IT ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS OR DO YOU WANT SOMEBODY TO BE CONTRACTED FOR THE WHOLE DURATION OF THE WHOLE AND HELP PUT TOGETHER PROJECT COSTS, ET CETERA? CAUSE THAT'S GOING TO BE A DIFFERENT, SO THIS WOULD JUST BE AS AN AS NEEDED BASIS OR WOULD THIS BE A FLAT MONTHLY FEE AND, AND THAT WILL BE THE DIFFERENCE IN THE CONTRACT. AND SO I WANTED TO GO AHEAD AND SPECIFY THAT IN THE RFQ BECAUSE I THINK THAT YOU'LL GET DIFFERENT PEOPLE AND WE'LL ALSO GET DIFFERENT PROPOSALS. UM, BECAUSE IN NEGOTIATIONS [00:15:01] IT WOULD BE GREAT TO HAVE A FLAT RATE AND ANNUAL RATE TO INCLUDE ALL COUNTY ROADS FOR ALL COMMISSIONERS OR UM, IT WOULD BE BY TASK, WHICH WOULD THEN BE BROKEN OUT MORE BY PRECINCT, I GUESS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT ONE TIME DOING IT KIND OF BY TASK. BECAUSE WE DO HAVE AN IN HOUSE ENGINEER THAT CAN DO A LOT OF IT AND THERE ARE SOME ROADS THAT WE'RE GOING TO USE MONEY ON THAT WE'RE NOT NECESSARILY GOING TO USE IT AND THE ENGINEER IN FRONT OF THEM DO. SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HIRE THEM TO DO ALL THE ROADS AND THEN THEY'RE GOING TO CHARGE YOU FOR ALL OF THEM. I DON'T, I MEAN I'M JUST SAYING I DON'T FORGET IT FOR A FLAT RATE THOUGH. THEN IF YOU CAN VARY THE, YOU KNOW, WHETHER THE WORDS SAY NO, THIS ISN'T, WE'RE NOT DESIGNATING YOU TO DO THIS. YEAH. OKAY. DO WE HAVE RON AVAILABLE TO GIVE HIS INPUT ON HIS THOUGHTS ON THIS PROCESS? UM, HE'S CAPABLE OF PROVIDING WHEN HE MET WITH ME AND A COUPLE OF THE DIFFERENT VENDORS WHO HAVE COME BY THE OFFICE, UM, WE DEFINITELY KNOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE GEO-TECH AND MATERIALS TESTING AND UM, AS FAR AS LIKE HAVING THE SOFTWARE AND THINGS LIKE THAT TO DO THE ENGINEERING PLANS ON THE ROAD, UH, WE'LL PROBABLY HAVE TO OUTSOURCE THAT. BUT AS FAR AS LIKE OVERSEEING THE PROJECTS, UM, I MEAN THAT WOULD BE A QUESTION FOR HIM. UH, THERE'S JUST, AND I'M TRYING TO DECIDE, LIKE I REALLY JUST WANTED THE RFQ TO BE AS CLEAR AS POSSIBLE. THAT WAY THERE'S VERY LITTLE TIME FOR NEGOTIATION ONCE WE APPOINT A VENDOR. SO I THINK, I THINK IT'D BE IMPORTANT FOR US TO GET AN IDEA OF WHAT THE COST DIFFERENCE WOULD BE. FLAT RATE VERSUS, UH, INDIVIDUAL BECAUSE, UH, NUMBER ONE, I FULLY AGREE THAT I THOUGHT A HUGE MOTIVATION FOR A COUNTY ENGINEER WAS THAT HE WOULD IN MANY INSTANCES SERVE AS OUR PROJECT MANAGER, SO TO SPEAK, FOR LACK OF A BETTER TERM. SECOND, UH, CERTAINLY IN MY PRECINCT, AND I SUSPECT IT'S TRUE EVERYWHERE, THERE ARE MANY ROADS THAT VERY LIKELY WILL NOT REQUIRE EXTENSIVE ENGINEERING. UH, UM, THEY'LL JUST BE A REPLICATION OF, OF THE SAME, UM, PROCESS, IF YOU WILL. SO I THINK BEFORE WE CAN REALLY DECIDE, UH, I'D LIKE TO KNOW WHAT'S THE COST DIFFERENCE FOR OUR FLAT RATE WHERE WE, WHERE THEY WOULD IN ESSENCE JUST BE ON CALL VERSUS A TASKING, YOU KNOW, HAVING, HAVING A CONTRACT WITH SOMEONE THAT WOULD THEN BE AVAILABLE FOR INDIVIDUAL TASKINGS BECAUSE I CERTAINLY DO, UH, UH, COMMISSIONER HUNTER, RIGHT. UM, OUR COUNTY ENGINEER CERTAINLY LACKS A LOT OF THE, THE TOOLS AND CAPABILITIES THAT WILL GO INTO SOME OF, UH, YOU KNOW, THE TECHNICAL ASPECTS. BUT, UH, IF HE HAS THE ABILITY TO, TO INDIVIDUALLY, UH, TAP A VENDOR TO ACCOMPLISH, UH, YOU KNOW, THE, THE NECESSARY WORK ON COUNTY ROAD SO AND SO, AND THAT IS A COST SAVING OVER A FLAT RATE, THEN THAT MIGHT BE THE WAY TO GO. SO WE KIND OF NEED TO KNOW. SO WHAT WILL HAPPEN, UM, IN JUST THE RESEARCH THAT I'VE DONE WITH OTHER BOND PROJECTS AND WITH OTHER COUNTIES, UM, WHEN I SAY FLAT RATE, YOU'RE LOOKING AT IT WILL EXCEED PROBABLY A HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN, BUT THAT'S GOING TO BE FOR, UM, YOU KNOW, THE MEETINGS, THE PRIORITIZING, THE GETTING THE LIST AND EVERYTHING TOGETHER TO GO AHEAD AND DO SOME OF THE SURVEYING. UM, YOU KNOW, TO PUT THE LIST, IS IT GOING TO HAVE TO BE EXCAVATED CULVERTS TO DO A COMPLETE INVENTORY FOR EACH ROAD AND THEN YOU WILL STILL HAVE TO, UM, THERE WILL STILL BE TASK WHEN A PARTICULAR ROAD HAS TO BE ENGINEERED. SO IN ESSENCE, YOU HIRE THE FIRM TO HELP GET ALL OF YOUR PROJECTS TOGETHER. AND THEN WHEN YOU HAVE A ROAD THAT DOES NEED ENGINEERING ON IT, THAT WOULD STILL BE SEPARATE. SO JUST TO KIND OF LET YOU KNOW HOW THAT, I THINK IN LARGE PART WE'VE, WE'VE SORT OF ALREADY GONE DOWN THE ROAD TO IDENTIFY OUR PROJECTS OR AT LEAST, UH, YOU KNOW, GROUPING SOME OF THOSE, THOSE PROJECTS. I THINK WHAT Y'ALL ARE REFERRING TO AS THE FLAT RATE SYSTEM, JUST TELL ME RIGHT IF I'M WRONG, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THAT WOULD DO IS IT WOULD ALLOW WHOEVER THAT FIRM IS, IT WOULD ALLOW THEM TO BUNDLE PROJECTS TOGETHER SO THAT INSTEAD OF, IF THEY'VE DONE A COMPREHENSIVE THING, INSTEAD OF OF SOMEBODY BIDDING ON THIS ROAD OR THAT ROAD, DEPENDING ON WHAT THEY PUT TOGETHER, THEY MIGHT BE BIDDING TO DO THE WORK. [00:20:01] THE CONTRACTOR MIGHT BE BIDDING TO DO THE WORK ON A W ON THE ROADS THAT ARE BUNDLED TOGETHER. THAT WOULD MAKE SOME SENSE. IS THAT RIGHT? YES. OKAY. SO, UH, HOW, HOW MUCH, UH, HOW GOOD OF AN IDEA IS IT THAT WE GET THE NUMBERS THAT WE ASKED FOR PROPOSALS FOR A FLAT RATE? WHAT I, THAT'S THE WORD WE'RE USING ALL OF. THAT'S PROBABLY NOT A PROPER TERM FOR A FLAT RATE. AND HERE'S RON. UM, HOW MUCH, WHAT ARE WE GETTING OURSELVES INTO IF WE, IF WE ASKED FOR A FLAT RATE PROPOSAL, COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL AND UH, UH, JOB BY JOB PROPOSAL. WELL WHAT I'LL DO IS IN THE RFQ I WILL LET THEM KNOW THAT, I MEAN CAUSE OBVIOUSLY RFQ THEY'RE JUST GIVING US INFORMATION ABOUT THEIR FIRM BECAUSE THIS IS AN ENGINEERING SERVICE. WE WON'T BE ABLE TO GO OUT FOR RFP, BUT I CAN MAKE IT VERY SPECIFIC IN THE RFQ TO KNOW THAT IF YOUR FIRM IS CHOSEN, THESE WILL BE THE EXPECTATIONS. WE'RE LOOKING FOR A FLAT FEE FOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. WE'RE LOOKING FOR A FLAT FEE FOR THIS WE'RE LOOKING FOR AND SO WE'LL HAVE THE TASK BROKE DOWN AND THEN THAT WAY WE CAN GIVE THEM THE HEADS UP THAT THIS WOULD BE THE FEE STRUCTURE WE'RE LOOKING FOR IF WE GO INTO NEGOTIATIONS. AND THAT MAY BE, BUT WE'RE NOT GOING TO COME OUT OF THIS WITH A NUMBER TO COMPARE IS WHAT YOU'RE SAYING BECAUSE THAT'S, YOU CAN'T ASK FOR THAT. YOU CAN'T ASK FOR PRICING. RIGHT. ROHAN. HELLO. BEFORE WE DO THAT, LET ME ASK ONE MORE QUESTION. WE HAVE AN ENGINEERING FIRM ON RETAINER NOW. YES WE DO. OKAY, SO IS IT THE SAME TOP ENGINEERING, I MEAN IS THIS THE FARM WE HAVE ON CONTRACT NOW? IS IT CAPABLE OF DOING THE SAME TYPE STUFF? YES, AND OUR CONTRACT DOES READ FOR A COUNTY ROADWAYS ALSO WITH THAT. ARE THEY CAPABLE OF TAKING CARE OF OUR DAY TO DAY NEEDS AND THE BOND PROGRAM? I MEAN THAT WOULD BE, I MEAN IF THEY HAVE THE CAPABILITIES TO DO THAT, I DON'T KNOW. I'M JUST THROWING STUFF OUT, YOU KNOW, CAUSE I KNOW WHAT YOU DO. WE HAVE AN ENGINEERING, WHAT'S OUR BILLING STRUCTURE WITH THEM? THEY BILL US HOURLY. THEY DO A RUN ON THE MONEY. IT'S KEVIN CHRIST, DIDN'T YOU? DIDN'T YOU? DIDN'T YOU RUN THE MON PROGRAM IN ARLINGTON OR YOU SAID THE ROAD AND ALMOST ALL THAT WERE WAS DESIGNED BY OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS. I NEED TO JUST MANAGE THE RIGHT, RIGHT. MANAGE THE MOTHERBOARD. YOU AFFECTED WHAT THEY DID, MADE SURE THAT THEY WERE DOING WHAT THEY WERE ASKED TO DO AND THEIR PROJECTS AND CAME, AND THEN I ACTED THIS AS A CHECK AND A MANAGER OF THE VARIOUS ENGINEERING FIRMS THAT WERE DOING DESIGN. I DID HAVE SOME IN HOUSE ENGINEERS THAT DID DESIGN AS WELL, STEP UP TO THE PODIUM HERE. UH, I ALSO, UH, UH, HAD SEVERAL ENGINEERS THAT WORKED FOR ME THAT DID IN HOUSE DESIGN. SO, UH, YES, I'VE, UH, I'M FAMILIAR WITH WHAT, WHAT IS TRYING TO DO AS FAR AS HAVING THEM PERFORM THE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT WOULD NOT PRECLUDE ME FROM, YOU KNOW, ACTING AS A MA, UH, ADDITIONAL MANAGER TO THEM TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING WAS BEING DONE AS THE COUNTY WISHED IT TO BE DONE. OH. AND I LIKE WHAT COMMISSIONER KATE SAID, YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? A LOT OF THESE ROADS, WE DON'T NEED A LOT OF EXTRA ENGINEERING TO DO, SO WE DON'T WANT TO WASTE A LOT OF MONEY THAT WE COULD BE PUTTING INTO MATERIALS TO GET THE ROADS DONE IN ENGINEERING COSTS. THAT'S CORRECT. BUT YOU ALSO HAVE TO REALIZE THAT IT'S A RISK BALANCE. YEAH. UH, THE, THE MORE CHILL TECH, THE MORE DESIGN YOU DO, THE LESS RISK YOU HAVE. CONVERSELY, THE MORE DESIGN YOU DO, THE MORE TESTS YOU TAKE, THE LESS MONEY YOU HAVE TO SPEND ON THE ROAD ROAD. SO IT'S A BALANCING ACT THAT ULTIMATELY I'LL ADVISE YOU ON, BUT IT WILL BE YOUR DECISIONS CLEAR AS MUCH. RON, HAVE YOU, HAVE YOU INTERACTED WITH OUR RETAINED ENGINEERING FIRM SINCE YOU'VE BEEN ON BOARD? YES. DO YOU HAVE AN OPINION ON THEIR CAPABILITY IN THIS, UH, TECHNO IMPRESSIONS? UH, I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THEM WHEN I WAS IN BEDFORD AS WELL. UH, THEY'RE AN EXCELLENT FIRM. UH, THEY'RE A, UM, THEY'RE A VERY GOOD FARM. UH, [00:25:01] I, I DON'T HAVE ANY QUALMS WITH WORKING WITH THEM. UH, THERE'S A NUMBER OF GOOD FIRMS OUT THERE. SAME THING I CAN SAY FOR FREESE AND NICHOLS. UH, I'VE WORKED WITH THEM OVER THE YEARS. UH, THEY'RE, THEY'RE AN EXCELLENT FIRM AS WELL. YEAH, I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT, THAT THERE'S A MYRIAD OF ENGINEERING FIRMS THAT HAVE THE CAPABILITY. BUT SINCE WE HAVE A EXISTING RELATIONSHIP, I'M INTERESTED IN IF YOU FORMED AN OPINION AS TO WHETHER OUR CURRENT CONSULTANT COULD SUFFICE IN THIS OR NOT. I, I BELIEVE THEY COULD. UH, IT LIKE, UH, LIKE YOU SAID, IT'S A LIMITED EXPERIENCE. I'VE ONLY HAD ABOUT FOUR WEEKS WITH THE CURRENT STAFF THAT THEY HAVE, BUT I HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING THAT WOULD CAUSE ME ALARM. SO MAYBE YOU'RE SUGGESTING MAYBE THAT WE FIGURED OUT A COUPLE OF ROADS MAYBE OR SOMETHING LET THEM ENGINEER IT. AND WAS HE AT WORK? UM, WELL, RIGHT. I MEAN IF THE RIGHTS, I MEAN, I'M NOT MAKING A SUGGESTION PER SE, I JUST THINK THAT, UH, THAT SINCE, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT'S A VALID POINT THAT COMMISSIONER HAD BROUGHT UP. I MEAN, WE, WE HAVE AN EXISTING, THE RETAINED ENGINEERING FIRM AND, UH, I ABSOLUTELY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THERE ARE, UH, GOING TO BE A NUMBER OF INSTANCES WHERE WE NEED, UM, A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF ENGINEERING AS THIS BOND PROJECT GOES FORWARD AS THE ROAD PROJECT GOES FORWARD. BUT I ALSO BELIEVE THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF THESE THAT ARE ESSENTIALLY GOING TO JUST REPLICATE THE PROCESS OVER AND OVER. SO, UM, I'M A LITTLE RELUCTANT JUST INDIVIDUALLY TO SAY WE OUGHT TO MOVE FORWARD AND HAD SPENT A HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ON A SERVICE THAT I, I'M NOT SURE WE YET KNOW THAT WE TRULY NEED OR MORE. I MEAN, UH, YOU KNOW, A HUNDRED THOUSAND MAY BE LIKE, I'M NOT SURE. OKAY. I GUESS, UH, I GUESS AN RFQ DOESN'T SPEND ANY MONEY. NO, IT DOESN'T. UM, YOU JUST, THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD, UM, JUST SPEAK UP AGAINST IS WE WILL HAVE A LOT OF THE OTHER HIGHWAYS AND THERE'S GOING TO BE A LOT OF OTHER WORK THAT COMES UNDER KAUFMAN COUNTY. AND SO WE DO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE VENDORS CONTINUE TO SUBMIT. AND SO WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT ENGINEERING FIRMS, THINGS LIKE THAT, UM, THEY WILL HAVE LOTS OF OPPORTUNITY TO COME IN AND BE ENGINEERS IF A PARTICULAR PROJECT AS THOSE GET BROKEN DOWN. UM, I JUST, I HATE TO PUT AN RFQ OUT THERE AND THEN RESEND IT IF WE DECIDE THAT IT'S SOMETHING WE DON'T WANT. UM, I THINK JUST BETTER FOR THE VENDORS IS IF YOU WANT TO SEE IF TN, IF WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE IS GOOD. AND THEN IF WE GO, WE NEED TO GO OUT FOR RFQ LATER. I WOULD JUST SUGGEST IF WE GO TO THE VENDORS, WE BE IN A POSITION WHERE WE'LL AT LEAST GET INTO NEGOTIATIONS. WELL, I MAY ASK YOU ANOTHER QUESTION AND MAYBE SOMEONE ELSE UP HERE CAN ANSWER THAT. THE BOND IS BROKE UP WITH RURAL RURAL COUNTY ROADS, OFFICES, ROADS ON SYSTEM ROADS AND THEN CITY ROADS. RIGHT. SO I GUESS POSTER WOULD BE DEALING WITH THE ENGINEERS IF HE TRIES TO PARLAY TO TRY TO GET FUNDING. SO HE WOULD HAVE A RELATIONSHIP THAT WOULD BE TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN SOMEONE WOULD HAVE A RELATIONSHIP WITH RON AND THE COUNTY ROADS. SO THERE COULD BE SOME DISPARITY IN THE TOP JOBS THAT THEY'RE DOING. AND I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF I'M MAKING SENSE TO MYSELF, BUT I DON'T, I DON'T UNDERSTAND. I'M SAYING THIS, BUT, BUT I MEAN WE HAVE DIFFERENT ROADS AND DIFFERENT RESPONSIBILITIES WHERE IF WE HIRE A COMPANY THAT'S GOING TO BE DOING THE BIG STATE HIGHWAYS AND STUFF, YOU KNOW, WHEN, AND WE'VE GOT COUNTY ROADS, THEY WON'T TAKE IT HERE AS MUCH IF I MIGHT. UM, AS I SEE POSTERS, UM, A JOB WITH THE OUNCE, THE ONSITE SYSTEM ON, ON ZONES, OFFSETS, ON SYSTEM, UH, PROJECTS, HE'S MAINLY GOING TO BE INVOLVED IN DEALING WITH TECHSTARS AS FAR AS GETTING FUNDING AND MAKING SURE THAT THE PROGRAM IS ADMINISTERED CORRECTLY, UH, THAT WE MEET ALL THE TEXTILES REQUIREMENTS THAT WE MEET ALL THE, UH, COUNTY'S REQUIREMENTS. YOU KNOW, THAT, YOU KNOW, EVERYTHING RUNS SMOOTHLY. WHERE I SEE MY ROLE, UH, [00:30:01] LIMITED SOMEWHAT IS DEALING WITH THE STATE TO SEE, TRY TO, TO TRY TO MAKE SURE THAT DURING THE DESIGN AND EXECUTION OF THESE PROJECTS THAT THE, THAT THE COUNTY'S DESIRES ARE MET FROM A, FROM A TECHNICAL STANDPOINT ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FACILITY. UH, SO THAT YOU HAVE A, AT LEAST HAVE A VOICE WHEN IT COMES TO THE ENGINEERS, UH, WHO TEXTS THAT HAS DESIGNING THE PROJECT AND DEALING WITH TEXTS. DOT. BECAUSE I'VE WORKED FOR TEXTILE FOR SIX YEARS, SO I UNDERSTAND SOME OF HOW THEY THINK. UM, AND THAT'S HOW I SEE MYSELF WITH THAT. SIMILARLY WITH THE CITIES AS I SEE, THE CITIES WILL PROBABLY BE RETAINING THEIR OWN FIRMS, YOU KNOW, FOR THEIR DESIGNS. AGAIN, I'LL TAKE A SIMILAR ROLE WITH THOSE ENGINEERING FIRMS AND WITH THOSE CITIES TO HELP BRIDGE THE GAP, SO TO SPEAK, BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE CITIES AND THEIR ENGINEERS AND JUST, JUST HELP FACILITATE THINGS. OKAY. SO RAYMOND, WHAT I THINK I AND EVERYBODY JUMPED IN IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH WHAT I'M SAYING. I THINK WHAT I, UH, IT SEEMED LIKE THE COMMISSIONERS ARE NOT PARTICULARLY INCLINED TO, YOU DON'T WANT TO GO OUT FOR RFQ IF WE'RE NOT, WE DON'T WANT TO ASK PEOPLE TO GO THROUGH THAT PROCESS IF WE'RE NOT SERIOUS ABOUT OR IF WE DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO GO FORWARD WITH IT. UM, AND OBVIOUSLY Y'ALL CAN DO WHAT YOU WANT TO DO. IT'S JUST IT JUST, BUT I UNDERSTAND YOU'RE TRYING TO PROTECT YOU. YOU'RE TRYING TO PROTECT THE, THE, THE CREDIBILITY THAT WE HAVE WITH OUR VENDORS AND OUR, YOU KNOW, THE ENGINEERING COMPANIES. AND THAT'S, I MEAN, WE DON'T WANT ANYBODY WASTING TIME IF WE'RE NOT INTERESTED AT THIS POINT. SO WITH OUR EXISTING UH, VENDOR THAT WHAT I HEAR IS THE COMMISSIONERS WOULD LIKE TO JUST USE THEM TO ADVANCE THESE PROJECTS AND SEE HOW THAT WORKS AND NOT GO OUT FOR RFQ RIGHT NOW FOR THE ENGINEERING SERVICES PR. WOULD WE BE WILLING TO CONSIDER MAYBE TABLING THIS UNTIL UH, ASKING BOTH OUR, OUR, UH, RETAINED ENGINEERING FIRM AND POLLSTER TO COME FORWARD AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COURT ON THIS MATTER? WELL, I DON'T KNOW. WHAT'S THE HARM IN TABLING IT? DO YOU THINK THAT'S GONNA THAT'LL SET US BACK A COUPLE OF WEEKS. UM, NO IT'S JUST THE ONLY THING TO KEEP IN MIND IS THE TIMING OF THIS. SO IF YOU DO CHOOSE TO GO OUT FOR RFQ YOUR 30, 45 DAYS OUT FROM HAVING A CONTRACT. SO THAT'S WHY WE WENT AHEAD AND PUT IT ON THIS WEEK. SO, I MEAN, LIKE I SAID, IT'S UP TO YOU. IF YOU WANT TO WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING, JUST KNOW THAT WHEN A DECISION IS MADE, YOU'RE STILL PROBABLY 45 DAYS OUT OF THEM BEING ABLE TO BEGIN WORK. I'M LUCKY TWO WEEKS RATHER THAN WHAT WE ARE, WHERE WE ARE NOW IN OUR WORLD THAT WE'RE OPERATING IN RIGHT NOW. WE'RE ALLOWED TO BE MEETING EVERY WEEK. I MEAN IT'S POSSIBLE, RIGHT? MY FRIEND, WE MAY BE MEETING EVERY DAY. YEAH. SO I MEAN, SO I'M NOT, I'M NOT TOO WORRIED ABOUT IT. I TH I THINK, I THINK WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A LITTLE MORE DISCUSSION AND SOME KIND OF, OKAY. THAT SEEMS TO BE A, THAT SEEMS TO BE A CONSENSUS. SO, UH, WHAT I'M GOING TO CALL FOR IS A MOTION TO TABLE AUTOMATE, WHICH IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN DISCUSSING. PERMISSION TO SOLICIT RFQ 2014. Y'ALL MAKE THAT MOTION. I'D LIKE TO ADD THAT WE ALSO, UM, REACH OUT TO OUR RETAINED CONSULTANTS, UM, MR POLLSTER AND OUR ENGINEERING CONSULTANT AND, AND UH, OBTAIN SOME INPUT ON THE, ON THE MATTER. OKAY. OKAY. SO WE HAD THAT MOTION ON THE TABLE. IS THERE, IS THERE A SECOND CHECK ON COMMISSIONER BARBARA? THE MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER CAGE, UH, DISCUSSION. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, THOSE OPPOSED? NO, MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. ONE POINT OF CLARITY IS THAT BOTH TECHNICAL AND PERKINS AND FOR HIS NICHOLS, I'M SORRY. UH, WE HAVE TWO FARMS THAT HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH US. UH, YOU W YOU WERE WE JUST TALKING ABOUT UH, TAKING ON PERKINS. ARE WE TALKING ABOUT BOTH OF THEM AND FREESE AND NICHOLS DISCUSSIONS? DO YOU WANT TO HAVE DISCUSSION WITH BOTH OF THEM? WITH POLLSTER AND THE, IN OUR CURRENT CONSULTANT ENGINEERING ONE WE HAVE ON CONTRACT. THANK YOU RON. JUDGE, CAN I SAY SOMETHING? UM, JUST TO REMIND YA, DAVID MENDEZ WAS CALLING ME AND I HAD TO TEXT HIM AND SAY, LEAVE ME ALONE. I'M IN A MEETING. UM, WE CLOSE TOMORROW ON THE BOND ISSUES AND UM, AFTER THIS I HAVE TO LEAVE AND GO FEDEX [00:35:01] SOME TAX RETURNS FORMS I HAD TO SEND. UM, BUT TALKING WITH OUR OUTSIDE AUDITORS BECAUSE I'M KEEPING THEM INVOLVED AND NO ONE ABOUT THE BOND ISSUES CAUSE IT HAS TO BE RECORDED. UM, THEY SENT SOME INFORMATION FOR ME TO PASS TO REILAND, UM, THAT SHE'S GOT TO START DOCUMENT AND CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS. SO IT'S GOING TO BE SHOWED ON OUR, OUR BOOKS AND THAT WE'RE DOING THESE CERTAIN PROJECTS AND THEN THEY'RE GOING TO BE DEPRECIATED ONCE THEY'RE COMPLETED. JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, WE'LL PROBABLY BE ASKING A LOT OF QUESTIONS SOMETIMES OF WHAT WAS SPENT AND HOW MUCH WAS SPENT ON A PARTICULAR ROAD SO WE CAN TRACKING. OKAY. UH, THANK YOU RON. OKAY. [9. Raylan Smith: Discuss and consider receipt, transfer, and disposal of County owned assets.] RAYLAN UH, DISCUSSING CONSIDER RECEIPT TRANSFER AND DISPOSAL OF COUNTY ON ASSETS. I JUST NEED TO AUCTIONS IN CARS. I DID GIVE YOU ALL A NEW LIST BECAUSE WE HAD A FEW MORE TURNED IN IN THE PAST COUPLE OF DAYS. OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WAY. CAN GET RID OF SOME OF MY YARD ART I HAVEN'T PICKED UP. I'LL SECOND IT. WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER HUNT AND A SECOND COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS TO AUTHORIZE THAT PROCEEDS TRANSFER AND DISPOSAL OF COUNTY ON ASSETS IS, UH, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES. NEXT ITEM. THANK YOU. RAELYNN UH, [10. Desiree Pool; Discuss/Consider approving Business Associate Agreement with Integrated Prescription Management.] NEXT ITEM IS, COMES TO US FROM DESERET. UH, D I'VE ACTUALLY, SHE'S, UH, UH, ASKING US TO APPROVE THIS AGREEMENT WITH INTEGRATIVE PRESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT. UM, I WOULD, UH, SHE TALKED TO ME ABOUT THIS. I THINK IT'S, UH, IT, IT'S SOMETHING GONNA SPEED UP AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT'LL BE, UH, AN ASSET TO HER. DOES SHE TRIES TO CONTINUE TO DEAL WITH. HE BRIEFED ME ON IT TOO. IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M SORRY. DESERAE ALSO BREACHED ME ON IT YESTERDAY TO NO COST CONTRACT RENEWAL OF THAT COMPANY THAT SHE'S CURRENTLY USING. ANY QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY. NO COST. YEAH. YUP. YUP. SO IS THERE A, UH, NO COST TO US ANYWAY, RIGHT? UH, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE, UH, ENTERING INTO THAT BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT WITH INTEGRATED PRESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION WE HAD EMOTIONAL CONCERN BARBERS OR SECOND, SECOND, UH, SECOND COMMISSION CAGE DISCUSSION. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE, THOSE OPPOSED? NO, THAT MOTION CARRIES, UH, BEFORE WE, I THINK WHAT WE'LL DO IS WE'LL DO THE NEXT TWO ITEMS AND THEN I HAVE A, UH, A NOTE FROM SOMEONE. THEY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO US. SO WE'LL DO THESE NEXT TWO ITEMS. [11. Discuss/Consider line item transfers.] ITEM 11 DISCUSS, CONSIDER LINE ITEM TRANSFERS. THESE WERE EMAILED TO YOU LAST WEEK. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE LINE ITEM TRANSFERS? IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS, IS THERE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL ON AUTUMN 11? I'LL MAKE A MOTION. WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND. COMMISSIONER KATE'S DISCUSSION. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. THOSE POSTS KNOW THAT MOTION CARRIES, UH, [12. Discuss/Consider claims for payment.] ADAM 12, UH, DISCUSS. CONSIDER CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT. OKAY. YOUR COINS FOR PAYMENT ARE $573,541 AND 61 CENTS. I HAD TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL JURY. PAY A $520 SO IT WAS LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WAS EMAILED TO YOU. I WANTED TO CALL THAT TO YOUR ATTENTION. PAYROLL WAS 1,000,320 1,646 27 MAKING A TOTAL PAYOUT OF 1,000,008 95 ONE 87 88 QUESTIONS OR ANY QUESTIONS? IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AS PRESENTED? MOTION MOTION. COMMISSIONER BARBER. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND SEGMENT. COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS. DISCUSSION. THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? NO. MOTION CARRIES. UH, YOU'RE WELCOME. NOW, UM, SHARE IS, UH, I GOT THIS NOTE. I'LL JUST TELL YOU THIS, IF YOU DON'T MIND TELLING HIM, UH, MR. MURPHY WANTS TO, UH, DISCUSS, UH, THE SHELTER IN PLACE ITEM THAT'S NOT ACTUALLY ON THIS AGENDA. OH, HI. HEY, HOW ARE YOU DOING? THAT'S NOT ACTUALLY ON THIS AGENDA, BUT WE'RE GETTING READY TO RECONVENE INTO OUR EMERGENCY MEETING AND WE'D BE GLAD TO HEAR FROM YOU, MAN. SO THANK YOU. UM, [13. Adjourn Regular Meeting.] COMMISSIONER PHILLIPS, DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR SCHEDULED MEETING. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR PERMISSION PHILLIPS OR DURING THIS REGULAR SCHEDULE MEETINGS OR SECOND, IT WOULD BE MY PRIVILEGE TO [00:40:01] SECOND COMMISSIONER CAGE DISCUSSION THAT WAS IN FAVOR, SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? NO. MOTION CARRIES. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.