[00:00:05]
OKAY, THIS IS EXHIBIT SIX, OUR FINAL MEETING OF THE YEAR.
COMMISSIONER LEONARD, WOULD YOU OPEN US UPTODATE PLEASE.
FATHER, WE THANK YOU FOR GRACE AND YOUR MERCY.
AND FATHER, WE THANK YOU FOR THE PRESSURE COUNTY GRANT WISDOM AND THE DECISIONS WE MAKE.
THANK YOU FOR BEING WITH TABATHA AND, AND SAFE IN THE ACCIDENT SHE HAD YESTERDAY AND THAT YOU BE WITH BE WITH ALL HOLIDAYS AND KEEP THEM SAFE AND JESUS NAME.
I MEAN, YEAH, SHE'S, SHE'S FINE.
THE, UH, PARAMEDICS TRIED TO GET HER TO GO.
THE OTHER GIRL WENT TO PARKLAND.
SHE WAS DRUNK AND IT WAS NICE.
UH, BUT THE PARAMEDICS TOLD TABBY, SHE, YOU NEED TO BE GOING THE HOSPITAL AND BE CHECKED OUT.
TABITHA SAID, WELL, I'VE BEEN THIS THROUGH THIS BEFORE AND I'M FINE.
I PUT STATES OF AMERICA AND TWO, THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS.
ONE NATION RECENTLY BEEN PROVIDED A COPY OF OUR LAST MEETING, OF ANY CONDITIONS OF CORRECTIONS.
ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THOSE.
A MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER BROWN, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ALL MOTION.
YOU GOT A REPORT FOR US THIS MORNING? YES, SIR, I DO.
GUYS, THIS WEEK Y'ALL WANNA COME BY AND LOOK AT IT, SEE HOW THE FUNDS ARE STACK UP.
MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER DELLER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SHANE.
JOHNNY, YOU GOT REPORT CARDS? YES, SIR.
QUESTIONS? I HAVE A COPY OF THIS MOTION TO ACCEPT THAT MADE BY ONLY WHAT YOU END UP.
WESLEY, AS SOON AS THEY SIGN THIS, WE'LL BE READY FOR YOU.
DO YOU WANT TO COME UP AND LOOK? SURVEY THE SITUATION OVER AND SEE HOW YOU WANT.
COULD STAND WITH OUR BACKS TO THE WALL HERE SINCE OUR BACKS TO THE WALL.
[00:05:32]
YEAH.HE CHARGE FIVE BUCKS, SO I WANT EACH ONE WITH THIS.
HE'S GONE, DIDN'T SHE WAS, SHE WAS THIS SUPERINTENDENT.
THAT BRINGS SURROUNDING, UH, TO DISCUSS REACH OF 1415 BLOCK OF WOOD STATE SUBDIVISION KAUFMAN.
COUNSELOR, ARE YOU HERE THIS MORNING? YES, SIR.
JUDGE, I HAD, UH, UH, SENT MR. HORT A COPY OF THE, UH, UH, SO
[00:10:01]
HE WAS GONNA STILL PURSUE AND SEE WHAT THEY WOULD COME UP WITH OUT THERE AND, AND HOPEFULLY REPORT SOMETHING GOOD TO US THIS MORNING.HOPEFULLY WE HAVE, UM, YOU HAD ASKED, I'M GARY HORTON AGAIN.
PHILLIP KINLIN IS THE, UH, GENTLEMAN I WAS SPEAKING OF, WHO'S REQUESTING THE RE PLAT WHEN WAS BLOCK 15? UM, IF YOU RECALL, THE MAIN REASON WE WERE HERE IS TO SIMPLY GET AN EASEMENT THAT WAS RESERVED AND THE PLAT MOVED OVER, NOT TO DO AWAY WITH THE INTERIOR TO THE, THE TWO LOTS, 15 AND 14, NOT AFFECTING ANY LOT EXTERIOR TO THAT, BUT SIMPLY MOVE THE, THE EASEMENT OVER BECAUSE IT, ALTHOUGH IT'S NOT BEEN USED, IT ENCROACHES AS A MATTER OF THE PLAT RECORD THAT'S ON FILE.
SO IT SHOWED UP ON THE TITLE REPORT.
SO THE BUYER FOR MR. KINLIN, UM, HAS A CONCERN ABOUT CLOSING.
SO THAT, THAT'S REALLY THE REQUEST.
UM, AGAIN, QUICKLY, MR. KINLIN HAS OWNED LOT 15 AND 14 IN THE PAST, INTENDED TO BE THERE FOREVER.
IN 1997, CAME TO COUNTY, UM, WAS TOLD THAT IT WAS OKAY TO TREAT THOSE LOTS AS ONE AND THROUGH HIS BUILDER ENDED UP BUILDING A HOUSE OR EXPANDING A HOUSE THAT ENDED UP ENCROACHING JUST A FEW FEET INTO THIS RESERVE EASEMENT.
UM, MR. LIN SUFFERED A STROKE ABOUT A YEAR AGO, AND FOR THOSE ANOTHER REASONS, NEEDS TO SELL, GOT A CONTRACT AND THAT'S WHY WE APPRECIATE YOU INDULGING ME AND THAT'S WHY WE'VE BEEN UNDER SOME TIME PRESSURE.
ALRIGHT, UM, COMMISSIONERS ASKED US TWO THINGS IN THE LAST TIME WE WERE HERE.
ONE WAS TO CHECK ON GETTING CONSENT FROM ALL OF THE OTHER LOT OWNERS, AND THE OTHER WAS TO, UH, VERIFY MY BELIEF THAT THERE WASN'T SOME FREESTANDING OBLIGATION TO GET, YOU KNOW, TO, TO REQUIRE EVERYONE'S CONSENT.
WE LOOKED AT BOTH OF THOSE ISSUES.
WE WERE ABLE TO GET 15, UM, OF THE RESIDENTS IN THAT SUBDIVISION TO SIGN A CONSENT.
I BELIEVE COMMISSIONER LEONARD THOUGHT THAT THERE WERE 17 TOTAL.
UM, AND WE WERE NOT, HAVEN'T BEEN TURNED DOWN JUST SIMPLY WITH CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS AND WHATNOT.
I GUESS THEY JUST HADN'T BEEN ABLE TO FIND.
WE'VE BEEN UP THERE SEVERAL NIGHTS.
SO WE HAVE 15 OF THOSE WHO HAVE SIGNED A CONSENT.
UM, WHAT I WANTED TO ASK THE COMMISSIONERS TODAY, I DID RECEIVE JUDGE JEN'S LETTER, AND I DO UNDERSTAND, UH, CHAPTER TWO 30, UH, 2 32 0.09 PROVIDES FOR A READ PLAT DIVISION, WHICH DOES CALL FOR PUBLICATION.
BUT I ALSO WANTED TO POINT OUT A COUPLE OTHER SECTIONS OF THAT, UH, CODE THAT WOULD, I BELIEVE GIVE YOU THE ABILITY, IF YOU CHOSE TODAY, TO GRANT US THE RELIEF WE'RE ASKING FOR 2 32 0.0015 POINTS OUT THAT A COUNTY NEED NOT REQUIRE A PLAT IN ALL THE CASES THAT CHAPTER 2 32 PROVIDES FOR A PLAT, IN OTHER WORDS, SETS OUT THE STANDARD, BUT I THINK IT GIVES THE COUNTY THE RIGHT TO NOT NECESSARILY REQUIRE A PLAT, UM, IF THE COUNTY SO CHOOSES, UM, ALSO 2 32 0.010 SPECIFICALLY PROVIDES THAT A COUNTY MAY ALLOW CONVEYANCES BY MEETS AND BOUNDS IN A SITUATION WHERE YOU HAVE EXISTING LOTS PREVIOUSLY PLA UM, BECAUSE OF THOSE PROVISIONS, I BELIEVE THAT THE COMMISSIONERS DO HAVE THE AUTHORITY IN THIS SITUATION BECAUSE WE ARE DEALING WITH CHANGES THAT ARE ONLY INTERIOR TO THESE TWO LOTS.
UM, AND BECAUSE WE ARE NOT ABANDONING THIS EASEMENT, ALTHOUGH IT'S NOT BEEN USED AND I GUESS APPROACHING 25, NEARLY 30 YEARS, WE'RE JUST MOVING IT OVER A FEW FEET.
UH, SO NO EXISTING RIGHTS WOULD BE PREJUDICED, UM, OTHER THAN THE TWO LOT OWNERS WHO ARE ASKING FOR YOU TO DO THIS.
UM, BECAUSE OF THAT, UM, AND BECAUSE OF THE, UM, QUITE FRANKLY THE LIFE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT MR. KENON IS FACING AND THE FACT THAT WE'VE GOT A SALE, BUT WE DON'T WANT TO LOSE, UH, WE'RE ASKING YOU TO EXERCISE THAT DISCRETION, UM, IN THIS CASE TO GRANT THIS RECORDING OF A RELA THAT SIMPLY CODIFIES THE, UH, THE AGREEMENT THAT THESE TWO PARTIES BREACH AND 15 OF THE APPARENT 17 LOT OWNERS HAVE ALREADY CONSENTED TO JUDGE SINCE THIS THING DOESN'T AFFECT ANYBODY ELSE, ANY OF THOSE OTHER 17 PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN THERE.
UH, IT'S ONLY AN INTERIOR THING.
IT ONLY AFFECTS THESE TWO LOTS IF WE HAVE THAT AUTHORITY TO DO THAT.
AND THIS IS NOT IN MY PRECINCT, BUT, UH, I DON'T, I PERSONALLY DON'T SEE A PROBLEM WITH IT UNLESS THERE'S SOME LEGAL ASPECT THAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND.
THE PROBLEM I HAVE IS THAT LAST TIME YOU TOLD US HE DIDN'T NEED TO DO ANY OF THIS BEFORE I EVEN CONSENT, I WOULD SAY I'D LIKE TO READ THIS, UH, OH ONE 15 AND OH ONE OH AND STUDY IT.
UH, BECAUSE LAST TIME HE SAID HE DIDN'T NEED TO DO ANY OF THIS, UH, WHEN THE
[00:15:01]
JUDGE SENT HIM A COPY OF THE, UH, 2 32 0 0 9, UH, TO ME THAT'S THE WAY WE GO ABOUT IT.AND IT'S, IT IS, IT'S POPULATION BASED AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT OH OH ONE 15 AND OH OH 1, 0 1 OH SAYS, I'D LIKE TO READ IT AND STUDY IT.
UH, IF I'M GONNA MAKE A DECISION, I NEED TO KNOW WHAT I MAKE A DECISION ON MR. LER.
I HAVE A COPY IF YOU WOULD LIKE.
THEY'RE BOTH PRETTY SHORT PROVISIONS.
BUT LET ME CLARIFY BECAUSE I DON'T WANNA, UM, LEAVE THE IMPRESSION WITH THE COURT THAT I IN ANY WAY TRIED TO MISREPRESENT LAST TIME I APPEARED IN RESPONSE TO THE JUDGE'S CONCERN THAT WE, UH, NEEDED THE CONSENT OF ALL THE HOMEOWNERS.
UM, I, I SAID THEN, AND I SAY AGAIN NOW I'M NOT AWARE AND WE'VE RESEARCHED IT AND COULD NOT FIND ANY LAW THAT SAYS WHEN YOU DO A REPL, THERE'S A FREE STANDING OBLIGATION TO GET EVERY HOMEOWNER IN THE SUBDIVISION TO SIGN OFF.
IT IS ONE OF THE ALTERNATE CRITERIA IN 2 32 0.009 THAT THE JUDGE POINTED OUT.
BUT BECAUSE OF THE OTHER PROVISIONS, I BELIEVE THEN, AND I BELIEVE NOW THAT THIS UNIQUE FACT SITUATION, UM, UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES, THAT THE COMMISSIONERS DO HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DO THIS WITHOUT A COMPLETE REPLAY.
AND, AND SO THAT'S, THAT, THAT'S WHAT I, THAT THERE'S NOTHING IN THE STATUTES THAT SAYS 'CAUSE HE HAS A, AN ILLNESS AND BECAUSE HE HAS A SALE PENDING THAT WE CAN VIOLATE THE LAW.
WE DID, WE HAVE TO GO BY THIS.
WELL, AND, AND ALL I'M ADDING TO THAT IS, IS THAT APPARENTLY THE LEGISLATURE, I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION OR OTHERS, UM, HAS ALLOWED IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES FOR THE COMMISSIONERS TO HAVE SOME DISCRETION.
2 32 0.0015 SUBSECTION A SAYS, UH, TO DETERMINE WHETHER SPECIFIC DIVISIONS OF ATLANTA ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLATTED, A COUNTY MAY DEFINE AND CLASSIFY THE DIVISIONS.
HERE'S THE PHRASE, A COUNTY NEED NOT REQUIRE PLATING FOR EVERY DIVISION OF LAND, OTHERWISE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THIS SUB CHAPTER.
OKAY? THAT'S WHAT WE'RE NOT PLATING.
SO 2 32 0.0010 PROVIDES THAT COMMISSIONER'S COURT OF THE COUNTY MAY ALLOW A CONVEYANCE OF PORTIONS OF ONE OR MORE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED LOTS BY MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION WITHOUT REVISING THE PLAT.
IF YOU READ THAT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE OVERALL GRANTING AUTHORITY, WHICH IS 2 32 0.001, WHICH ALSO PROVIDES THE PLAT IS ONLY REQUIRED WHEN THERE'S A SUBDIVISION OF LAND.
AND THEN EVEN IF YOU READ THE SUBSECTION OF THE, UH, THE REGULAR PLATTING RE PLATTING PROVISION THAT THE JUDGE CITED, 2 32 0.09 F NOTICE IS ONLY REQUIRED WHEN THERE IS AN ACTUAL DIVISION OF THE LAMAN.
SO I GUESS TAKING ON THAT ALL TOGETHER, THAT'S WHY I SUBMIT THAT IN THIS CASE, BECAUSE THERE'S NOT GONNA BE A CONVEYANCE.
IT'S INTERIOR TO THE TWO LOTS THAT ARE AFFECTED.
IT DOES NOT AFFECT ANY, THE OTHER CRITERIA, BY THE WAY, OR 2 32 0.09, IS EITHER YOU GET EVERYBODY'S CONSENT OR IT DOESN'T AFFECT AN ESTABLISHED DRIVE OF THE OTHER PEOPLE.
IN THIS CASE, THERE'S, THERE'S NO PROPERTY RIGHT THAT'S GONNA BE AFFECTED OF ANY OF THESE OTHER HOMEOWNERS.
NOW WE WENT AHEAD AND GOT AS MANY AS WE COULD IN THE TIMEFRAME SIMPLY TO CONFIRM WHAT MAY BE CONCERNS THAT YOU HAD THAT MAYBE SOMEBODY WAS OPPOSED.
AND, UM, SO FAR, A HUNDRED PERCENT, UM, HAVE CONSENTED AND THERE WAS ONLY TWO THAT WE JUST WEREN'T ABLE TO GET.
SO, MR. DE, THAT'S THE ONLY REASON I SUBMIT TO YOU THAT YOU HAVE IT WITHIN YOUR DISCRETION TO DO IT THIS WAY.
CLEARLY WE COULD FOLLOW THE COURSE THAT THE JUDGE HAS SUGGESTED WE COULD PUBLISH.
WE CAN WAIT FOR 30 DAYS, HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING, AND, AND THAT IS AN ALTERNATE WAY.
I'M JUST SUGGESTING BECAUSE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN THIS CASE, WE'RE ASKING YOU TO EXERCISE YOUR DISCRETION TO ALLOW IT.
UH, NOW BECAUSE OF THE TIMING ISSUES WE FACE, UNDERSTANDING THAT THOSE ARE OUR UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES, JUST A FACTOR TO CONSIDER.
IS THERE A, UH, AN IN BETWEEN WAY, YOU KNOW, WE, WE KEEP CALLING THIS A REFL, UH, WITHOUT ACTUALLY REFL.
UH, IS THERE A A MEANS FOR THE COURT COULD AGREE JUST SIMPLY TO THE CHANGE IN POSITION OF THE EASEMENT ON THOSE TWO LOTS WITHOUT CALLING IT A RELA OF THE WHOLE SUBDIVISION? ABSOLUTELY.
JUDGE, IF, IF, IF THE COURT WAS WILLING, WE COULD ASK THE SURVEYOR TO MODIFY WHAT WE'VE DRAWN SO THAT IT DOESN'T, UH, RECITE
[00:20:01]
A REPL AND FASHION SOME LANGUAGE THAT WAS AS TERRIBLY, YOU KNOW, TIGHTLY TAILORED AS, AS YOU MIGHT PREFER.IT SIMPLY STATES THAT YOU ARE APPROVING THE MOVEMENT OF THIS EASEMENT BY X NUMBER OF FEET AND SIMPLY DEPICT, UH, THE DRAWING.
IF I CAN BRING YOU ANOTHER COPY, UM, ALTHOUGH WRITTEN IN THE FORM OF A REPLAY, YOU CAN SEE IT ALREADY DEPICTS WHERE THE, BY THE TWO SHADED AREAS WHERE THE EXISTING, WHERE THE EXISTING, UH, EASEMENT IS AND WHERE THE NEW EASEMENT WOULD BE.
SO WE COULD MODIFY THAT PRETTY EASILY JUST TO SHOW THAT CHANGE.
AND FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, I DON'T BELIEVE WE NEED A REFLEX, BUT I DO BELIEVE WE NEED THE COMMISSIONERS TO MAKE THE DETERMINATION APPROVING THE MOVEMENT OF THE EASEMENT IN A FORM THAT WE CAN RECORD.
UM, CAN I ASK ANOTHER QUESTION? UM, AND I KNOW, UM, UH, Y'ALL UNDERSTAND THAT, UH, THAT IF, IF THERE WERE A WAY FOR ME TO, I UNDERSTAND PERFECTLY THAT THIS DOESN'T AFFECT ANYBODY EXCEPT THIS ONE PIECE OF PROPERTY AND THAT THERE, THERE'S A WAY TO LEGALLY DO IT.
I, I WOULDN'T HAVING A NURSE TO DO IT, YOU KNOW, AND THE PROBLEM IS WE'RE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE STANDING IN A PILE OF RED TAPE AND
WE'RE JUST HAVING TO MUD OUR WAY THROUGH WITH IT AS BEST WE CAN.
YOU SAID THAT WE CAN, WE CAN ALLOW IT TO BE CHANGED JUST BY MEETS AND BOUNDS.
NOW OF COURSE, I'VE BEEN HERE FOR EIGHT YEARS AND I DON'T KNOW THAT WE'VE EVER TAKEN ACTION TO, UH, TO ALLOW SOMEONE TO DO IT BY MEETS AND BOUNDS.
WOULD THE PRO PROPER PROCEDURE WOULD BE TO, FOR THIS COMMISSIONER'S COURT, JUST TO SAY WE'RE NOT GOING TO OBJECT TO A, TO A CHANGE IN MEETS AND BOUNDS.
AND IF THAT HAPPENS, WOULD THAT SATISFY THE UH, TITLE COMPANY? I CHECKED ON THAT COMMISSIONER LEONARD, AND I'M AFRAID IT WILL NOT, BECAUSE THE RESERVATION OF THIS EASEMENT WAS CREATED BY THE PLAT.
IT'S GONNA TAKE SOME COUNTY ACTION TO MOVE THE LOCATION OF THAT EASEMENT.
IN OTHER WORDS, I DON'T BELIEVE THESE PARTIES CAN INDEPENDENTLY AFFECT THE LOCATION OF THAT EASEMENT.
IT'S NOT GOING TO TAKE AWAY THE FACT THAT WE GOT A PLAT OUT THERE THAT SAYS THERE'S A REPORTED EASEMENT.
IF YOU WERE JUST CHANGING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE LOSS THEMSELVES, YOU COULD DO IT BY MEET SOME BOUNDS WITHOUT COMMISSIONER'S COURT INVOLVEMENT.
I BELIEVE SO, BECAUSE IT'S AN EASEMENT AND RECORDED WITHIN THE PLAT.
THAT'S WHY YOU'RE SEEKING, BECAUSE I'D ASK HIM THE SAME THING.
AND THAT'S WHY HE CHECKED WITH HIM TO SEE IF WE JUST PASSED THE RESOLUTION THAT WE'RE NOT OBJECTING TO MM-HMM
UH, BUT, UH, EVIDENTLY THEY'RE NOT GONNA ACCEPT THAT EITHER.
WELL, CAN WE, CAN WE AGREE, UH, TO MOVE THAT EASEMENT WITH, UH, THE MEETS AND BALANCES, PARTICULARLY LIKE THAT IF THE COMMISSIONERS ARE WILLING? I BELIEVE THAT WE COULD HAVE A SURVEYOR, UM, REMOVE THE PLATTING CONCEPT OF THAT, UH, DEPICT IT IF YOU'RE OKAY WITH STILL DEPICTING IT AS TRACK SO THAT PEOPLE CAN SEE WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT AND SIMPLY SHOW THAT, THAT THE ACTION IS A MOVEMENT OF THE LOCATION OF THAT EASEMENT.
AND JUDGE, MAYBE WITH YOUR CONSENT, I CAN TRY TO FASHION THAT LANGUAGE AND THEN YOU CAN LOOK AT IT, UM, TO SEE IF THAT WAS ACCEPTABLE.
NOW THIS EASEMENT WAS NOT GRANTED TO ANY UTILITY COMPANY.
AND I'VE LOOKED AT THE RUN SHEET FROM THE TITLE WORK.
THERE IS NO RECORDED EVIDENCE OF ANY E UM, ANY UTILITY BEING INVOLVED.
MR. LIN FROM LIVING THERE IS NOT AWARE OF ANYTHING EVER HAVING GONE IN THERE.
SO WHAT I THINK THE ONLY THING YOU HAVE IS JUST A DEVELOPER BACK IN THE EIGHTIES DOING PROBABLY WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS WERE AT THE TIME, OR JUST MAKING PROVISION FOR PEOPLE TO GET PUT UTILITIES IN WHO DREW OUT.
LIKE A LOT OF 'EM DO UTILITY EASEMENTS ALONG BORDERS OF ALMOST ALL THE LOTS.
IT JUST SO HAPPENS THIS ONE DIDN'T GET USED.
SO, SO AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW, COMMISSIONERS HAVE EXCLUSIVE CONTROL OF THAT EASEMENT.
IF ANYBODY USES IT, IT'S GONNA TAKE OUR APPROVAL TO USE IT ANYWAY.
CORRECT? I BELIEVE THAT'S PROBABLY, I, I I BELIEVE THAT THIS BODY IS THE ONLY ONE WITH AUTHORITY AT THIS POINT TO CERTAINLY MODIFY OR CHANGE THOSE RIGHTS.
[00:25:01]
JUDGE, YOU KNOW THAT MY POINT IS, IF, IF WE'RE, IF WE HAVE EXCLUSIVE CONTROL, IF THERE AREN'T OUTSIDE PARTIES THAT HAVE AN INTEREST IN THAT EASEMENT, IF IT'S SIM SIMPLY A MATTER OF MOVING IT OVER, DO WE, DO WE STILL HAVE TOWITHOUT SETTING THE PRESENT IN.
THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING IF YOU WORDED IN A WAY, A FASHION WHERE WE'RE NOT RE FLAGGED, JUST, UH, GIVE HER PERMISSION TO, UH, MOVE THE EASEMENT, UH, AND WE NOT READ THE FLAG.
UH, DELEGATE MOVE THE LOT LINES.
WELL, WE'RE NOT THE LOT LINES.
HE JUST MOVED GONNA AFFECT THE LOT LINES GONNA MOVE OVER HERE.
I MEAN, THE AGENDA SAYS REPLAY.
I, I DON'T THINK WE CAN TELL, AND I HATE TO SAY THIS AND I DON'T KNOW I'M GOING TO BE THE BAD GUY, BUT I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY ACTION WE CAN TAKE EXCEPT THE RE YOU KNOW, APPROVING A ON THIS AGENDA.
BUT IF, IF, UH, IF HE TAKES IT OUT OF THE REPL, WE HAVE IT ON THE NEXT AGENDA WHERE IT'S NOT A RELA BUT SIMPLY, UH, UH, AUTHORIZING THE MOVEMENT OF THE EASEMENT, THE UTILITIES AND NOT REFL.
WHEN YOU DO
I KNOW SOMETIMES IT'S NOT IN THE LAW.
AND IF WE WEREN'T REALLY CALLING A RE LAB, WE WERE SIMPLY CALLING FOR AN AMENDMENT AND THE SOLE AMENDMENT WAS TO MOVE THIS EASEMENT OVER, WELL, 17 PEOPLE IN THAT SUBDIVISION, 17 OUT OF NINE, UH, 15 OUT OF 17 HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO IT.
UH, WE'RE NOT REPLANTING ANYTHING THAT AFFECTS ANYBODY OTHER THAN OTHER THAN THIS GENTLEMAN HERE.
THE COMMISSIONER'S KNOWLEDGE, JUST GENERALLY, WE RESEARCHED THAT AS WELL.
AND, AND THERE'S EVEN A CASE OUTTA GRAYSON COUNTY WHERE A GENTLEMAN WAS GONNA REPL HIS SUB DEVICE, HIS LOT INTO 11 LOTS, TAKE HIS ONE, TURN IT INTO 11 MORE AND HE HAD OPPOSITION FROM, FROM THE OTHER HOMEOWNERS.
AND THE COURT OF APPEALS HELD THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE A PROPERTY, RIGHT.
THAT THE COMMISSIONERS IN THAT CASE COULD PROHIBIT A REFLEX BECAUSE IT WAS AN INTERIOR 'CAUSE IT WAS INTERIOR THE LOT.
AND OBVIOUSLY A SUBDIVISION OF THE LOT IS A LOT GREATER CONCERN, I WOULD THINK MOST FOLKS HAVE SIMPLY MOVE IN AN EASEMENT.
SO I POINT THAT OUT TO SIMPLY SAY THAT I THINK IS THE, A FAIR STATEMENT OF THE LAW IN TERMS OF OTHER HOMEOWNER'S RIGHTS TO OBJECT TO AN INTERIOR REFLEX AND THAT THAT WAS UNIQUE TO THAT CASE AND WHATNOT.
BUT THAT'S JUST AN EXAMPLE OF ONE THAT I DID FIND THAT IT GIVES US SOME INSIGHT INTO THE DISCRETION YOU HAVE IN CONSIDERING AN INTERIOR TO THE LOT WE FOUND, OR AMENDMENT WE WANT TO CALL IT, THAT THAT HELD TRUE IN GRAYSON COUNTY WHERE THEY WERE GONNA SUBDIVIDE THE WHOLE LOT AT THE 11 OTHER LOTS.
AND ALL WE'RE TRYING TO DO HERE IS JUST GET THIS EASEMENT MOVED OVER, WHICH DOESN'T AFFECT ANYBODY.
AND THAT, THAT WHOLE THING, I DON'T, IS THERE ANY WAY AT ALL THAT COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT ANY OF THE LANDOWNERS? WELL, AND I THOUGHT ABOUT THAT.
OKAY, WORST CASE SCENARIO, WHAT IF ONE OF THE TWO PEOPLE THAT THEY DIDN'T, DIDN'T GET AHOLD OF, OBJECTED TO IT FIRST THEY WOULD HAVE TO FILE A SUIT AND THEY WOULD'VE TO SOMEHOW PROVE THAT THEY WERE DAMAGED BY THIS EASEMENT BEING MOVED OVER.
AND I CAN'T IMAGINE THAT HAPPENED.
I CAN'T SEE HOW, I'M NOT AN ATTORNEY.
UM, I I, I, YOU KNOW, I DON'T SEE, I DON'T SEE WHERE YOU CAN TURN, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN HAVE, AND YOU KNOW, JIM, WHAT I NOTE AND, AND I HAVE AGREE WITH YOU, WE'RE GONNA DO A RELA FL, WE GOTTA FOLLOW THOSE RULES, BUT IT WOULD JUST GIVE THEM PERMISSION TO MOVE THE UTILITIES EASEMENT OVER,
[00:30:01]
WHAT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? 15 FEET, IT LOOK LIKE NOT EVEN 15 FEET.UH, IF WE JUST GIVE THEM PERMISSION TO, TO MOVE THE UTILITIES EASEMENT, WE'RE NOT ACTUALLY RELA THE SUB, BUT I HAVE AGREED WITH KEN, WE CAN'T DO IT TODAY BECAUSE OF THE WAY IT'S WORDED ON THE AGENDA.
IF WE WORD IT ON THE AGENDA, JUST, BUT WE'RE GONNA GIVE PERMISSION AND DO IT.
JUDGE, DO YOU KNOW WHEN THE NEXT MEETING IS? JUST DESCRIBE JANUARY 2ND.
JIM, DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM DOING IT THAT WAY? AND THAT GAVE YOU ALSO, THAT GAVE YOU, UH, TWO WEEKS RESEARCH THE LAW.
YEAH, I WORKED, I WORKED VERY HARD ON THIS.
MY BUDDY MR. WE TRIED TO GET AROUND THIS EVERY WAY POSSIBLE AND IT ALWAYS CAME BACK TO VISING THE PLAN, BUT HE WANTED TO DO MORE THAN JUST, OH, HE, THE THING WAS CHANGING THE SUBDIVISION RESEARCH.
TWO WAYS WE CAN DENY THE REPLANT AND PUT IT BACK ON THE AGENDA FOR, UH, JUST THE CHANGE OF EASEMENT OR WE JUST, UH, PASS THIS AND NOT PUTTING IT BACK ON THE AGENDA.
I SAY DENY IT BECAUSE OF YOUR TABLE.
YOU'LL, THAT'S, WE UNDERSTAND WE'RE GONNA DENY THE WE FLAT.
BUT ON JANUARY 2ND, BACK ON THE AGENDA FOR COMMISSIONER COURT TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER PAYING AION TO CHANGE, JUDGE CAN ASK JUST A COUPLE QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS.
IS THAT THE ONLY REMAINING CONCERN AT THAT POINT THEN WOULD BE US JUST RE REPRESENTING IT IN A FORMAT THAT THE LANGUAGE MIGHT WORK? OR IS THERE ANY OTHER ISSUE THAT I DON'T THINK SO.
THE LANGUAGE, UH, WHERE IT TAKES DOWN THE REPLANNING, BUT JUST UNDERSTAND WHEN COMMISSIONER'S BOARD CAN'T COMMIT A NEW COMMISSION COURT AND NEXT MEETING, IT'LL BE A NEW COMMISSIONER'S BOARD THAT YEAH, BUT THAT'S SOME SOMEWHAT ONE OF OUR REASONS FOR THE URGENCY IN WHICH WE'VE, UH, WE'VE ASKED FOR THIS RELIEF, BUT I RESPECT THE COURT'S DECISION.
UN UNLESS THERE'S, YOU KNOW, TWO PEOPLE IN THIS COURT THAT ARE WILLING TO COME MEET OR, YOU KNOW, HAVE A SPECIAL MEETING BEFORE WHERE WE HAVE TO CLOSE AND OKAY, YOU'RE STILL SAYING IN ONE OF THOSE OTHER, UH, RULING THAT, UH, MANY COURTS HAVE MADE THEIR DECISION WITHOUT HAVING A HUNDRED PERCENT OR WITHOUT HAVING ALL OF THOSE PEOPLE SIGN OFF ON IT.
COULD YOU READ, THEY DON'T HAVE TO SIGN OFF ON SIGNING OFF.
ON SIGNING IS SORT OF LIKE A WAIVER WHERE YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE THEM SERVED.
IF THEY DON'T ALL SIGN OFF, YOU HAVE TO HAVE THEM SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL.
AND THEN IF THEY COME, THEY CAN PROTEST OR THEY DON'T HAVE TO COME.
BUT IF YOU DON'T HAVE 'EM SIGN OFF ON IT, THEN EACH ONE OF 'EM HAS TO BE SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL.
BUT I WAS THINKING THERE WAS A PROVISION THEN THEY SAID YOU DIDN'T HAVE TO EVEN DO THAT IN CERTAIN CASES.
MY, IS THAT IN MY PROPOSAL TO YOU WAS THAT THERE ARE, THERE ARE SEVERAL PROVISIONS, TWO SPECIFICALLY THAT I REFERENCED THAT SUGGESTS THAT THE COUNTY GETS TO CHOOSE, IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO REQUIRE A PLAT IN EVERY CASE THAT CHAPTER 2 32 CALLS FOR PLATT.
AND THERE ARE EVIDENCE THAT ON THESE TYPES OF SITUATIONS, THEY MAY APPLY.
FOR INSTANCE, 2 32 0.010 IS ONE THAT SAYS A CONVEYANCE OF A PORTION OF ONE OR MORE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED LOTS BY MEETS AND BOUNDS CAN BE DONE WITHOUT REVISING A PLAT.
SO MY SUGGESTION WAS, YEAH, UNDERSTAND, BUT THAT WE'RE NOT DOING THAT HERE.
SO IS THAT BECAUSE WE'RE WE'RE SAYING A RELA NO, IT'S BECAUSE WE'RE NOT CONVEYING PROPERLY.
WE'RE JUST MOVING AN EASEMENT.
AND, AND THAT'S, AND THAT, AND YOU KNOW, AND THAT'S WHERE I HAVE A DILEMMA BECAUSE WE AREN'T CHANGING ANYTHING ELSE THAT AFFECTS ANYONE.
I MEAN, AND YOU KNOW, THAT THAT MAY BE ONE OF THOSE SITUATIONS WHERE SOMETIMES
[00:35:01]
YOU HAVE TO WEIGH ALL YOUR OPTIONS AND APPLY COMMON SENSE AND DO THE RIGHT THING.AND UH, AND THAT'S WHY I WAS THINKING MAYBE WE CAN GET TO IT BY REWORDING TO TAKE IT OUT OF THE RE PLACE.
UM, YOU DON'T FACT THERE'S ANY WAY THAT WE CAN DO IT TODAY BY INVOKING THIS PROVISION THAT SAYS THIS COURT HAS THE RIGHT TO, I MEAN, I'M GOING BACK TO THE COMMON SENSE THING.
YOU KNOW, AND I KNOW THIS MAY NOT ALL BE HUNDRED PERCENT, UH, UH, MEETING EVER BEEN OF THE LEGAL CRITERIA, BUT JUST MOVING THIS EASEMENT INSIDE THE LOT THAT'S NEVER, EVER BEEN USED.
NOT EVEN PUT THERE BY A UTILITY COMPANY.
HE'S MOVING FROM ONE OF HIS LOTS TO ANOTHER LOT.
UH, YOU KNOW, I, I DON'T KNOW, JUST A COMMON SENSE OF IS THERE ANY WAY THAT WE CAN GET THIS THING DONE TODAY? THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO FIND OUT.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SAYING THE WAY IT'S WORDED ON THE AGENDA IS TO APPROVE A
BUT DOES THAT ADDRESS A RELA OR DOES THAT, THAT THAT RULING THAT SAYS THAT WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO THAT.
DOES THAT ADDRESS A ALA IT, THE PROVISION OF THIS COURT DOES NOT ADDRESS RELA THE OTHER SECTION SUGGESTS THAT THE COMMISSIONERS GET TO DECIDE WHAT THEY REQUIRE PLATING FOR.
I THINK THERE'S A FAIR ARGUMENT, I DON'T KNOW THAT THERE'S A CASE ON IT THAT THIS COURT CAN ALLOW ON, BECAUSE WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF IT IS INTERIOR TO THE LOT CAN CODIFY ITS APPROVAL OF AN INTERIOR TO A LOT MOVEMENT THROUGH AN AMENDED PLAT.
I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT'S, UH, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE COMMISSIONERS WOULD, WOULD LIKE IT IF WE FOLLOW FULL PLAY PROCEDURE, UM, JUST BY READING ALL OF CHAPTER 2 32.
I WOULD SUBMIT TO YOU THAT I THINK THOSE ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED TO SUBDIVISIONS, WHICH MEANS THERE'S GONNA BE A DIVISION OF THE LAND, WHICH THERE'S NOT IN THIS CASE, AND WHERE THEY AFFECT OTHER PROPERTY OWNER RIGHTS.
SO BECAUSE OF THOSE, THOSE FACTS THAT AREN'T EXISTING IN THIS CASE, I, I BELIEVE, AND WE WERE ASKING THE COMMISSIONERS TO GO AHEAD AND GRANT THE RELIEF THAT WE'VE REQUESTED, UM, THAT THAT'S, I GUESS THAT'S OUR POSITION IS BECAUSE NONE OF THE IMPLICATIONS THAT THE PROVISIONS IN CHAPTER 2 32 ARE IMPLICATED 'CAUSE WE'RE NOT PROVIDING LAND.
UM, AND BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE'S PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED.
THAT'S WHY I BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN GRANT, OKAY, YOU, YOU ARE SAYING, OKAY, LET ME ASK YOU THIS QUESTION.
I MEAN, WHAT'S ON THE AGENDA, MR. GRANT RE YES, SIR.
AND WE'RE LIMITED TO, THAT'S THE ONLY THING WE CAN DO.
SO THAT, YOU KNOW THAT, AND I'M, I'M NOT TRYING TO BE CONTRARIAN, I'M JUST TELLING YOU WE'RE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THIS NARROW TONE THAT WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH AND I'M TRYING TO SEE IF WE CAN GET THROUGH IT.
UM, IS HAVE, IS THERE ANY OTHER MECHANISM EXCEPT PUBLISHING NOTICE? AND, AND IF, WOULD THIS NOTICE IT BEING ON TWO AGENDAS IN, UH, IT IS BEEN PUBLISHED TWICE, WOULD THAT SERVE AS NOTICE SO WE COULD GO AHEAD AND PROVE IT, APPROVE IT TODAY LEGALLY? WELL, MR. LEONARD, UH, 2 32 0.09 IS THE PROVISION, THE REAL REPLANTING PROVISION THAT THE JUDGE CITED.
SUBSECTION F EVEN SAYS THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT IS NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE NOTICE BY MAIL UNDER THE SUBSECTION IF THE PLAT REVISION ONLY COMBINES EXISTING LOTS EXISTING TRACKS.
AGAIN, TO ME THAT'S FURTHER THEY'RE NOT EVEN GOING THAT FAR.
RIGHT? THAT'S FURTHER EVIDENCE THAT THIS IS NOT THE CASE THAT THE LEGISLATURE WAS CONTEMPLATING.
WHEN THEY SAY SEND CERTIFIED LETTERS, GIVE PEOPLE'S CONSENT.
I, I BELIEVE, AND EVEN, EVEN IF YOU READ THE REQUIREMENTS OF 2 32 0.09, THE TWO CRITERIA ARE THE REVISION WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH ESTABLISHED RIGHTS OF ANY OWNER OF A PART OF THE SUBDIVIDED LAND.
I, I BELIEVE THE ONLY INTERESTED PARTIES TO THIS RE PLA ARE THE TWO PARTIES THAT ARE BEFORE YOU, WHICH IS LOT 15 AND LOT 14 OWNERS.
I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THE LANGUAGE EVEN OF THE RE PLATING PROVISION CALLS FOR YOU TO GET, UH, LET'S SAY 17 OUTTA 17 OF THE OTHER HOMEOWNERS SHOWED UP IN PROTEST.
I BELIEVE THAT THE GRAYSON COUNTY CASE SAYS TO THIS COMMISSIONER'S COURT THAT BECAUSE THEIR RIGHTS AREN'T AFFECTED, THAT'S NOT A LEGITIMATE CRITERIA THAT YOU CAN RELY ON TO DENY THE REFL.
I BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT THE LAW IS.
THAT'S REALLY MR. LER WHERE I WAS GOING WITH MY COMMENTS LAST TIME I WAS HERE BECAUSE OF THOSE FACTS.
I BELIEVE THAT THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE THE AUTHORITY ON AN INTERIOR RELAP TO APPROVE IT.
[00:40:01]
BUT AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, I ALSO POINT OUT WHAT MR. LEONARD POINTED OUT EARLIER.I DON'T KNOW WHO COULD HAVE A COMPLAINT.
UM, THERE ARE NO RIGHTS ABRIDGED, THIS EASEMENT'S NOT IN USE.
IT'S STILL GONNA BE ON LOT 15.
UH, IT'S STILL GONNA BE AVAILABLE.
IT'S STILL GONNA BE A PUBLIC RECORD.
UM, WHAT WE'RE REALLY DOING IS CLEANUP, FRANKLY, OF, OF, OF A SITUATION TO REFLECT IN THE, IN THE RECORD THAT WE DON'T HAVE AN ENCROACHMENT BY HOUSE.
SO THAT'S A LONG ANSWER TO IT.
BUT I BELIEVE THAT, THAT YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO GRANT THE REPL AS IT'S ON THE AGENDA.
THAT, THAT, UH, GO READ THAT SECTION AGAIN AND ORDER.
WHERE YOU THINK WE CAN GET AROUND, UH, SERVING ALL OF THE, UH, OWNERS.
KEEP IN MIND, JUDGE THAT IT JUST TALKS ABOUT, IT NEVER TALKS ABOUT AN EASEMENT.
THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT BOTHERS ME, RIGHT? IT TALKS ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE, BUT IT DOESN'T SPECIFICALLY MENTION AN EASEMENT.
I THINK YOU SEE, WE'RE ALL TRYING TO WORK HERE.
I UNDERSTAND, JUDGE, AND I REALLY DO APPRECIATE Y'ALL PATIENCE BECAUSE WE'RE TAKING UP A LOT OF YOUR TIME.
SUBSECTION F OF 2 32 0.09, PROVISION YOU SENT TO ME PROVIDES, BECAUSE EARLIER IN SUBSECTION THREE, IT SAYS, YOU KNOW, YOU NEED TO SEND NOTICE IN CERTAIN CASES TO PEOPLE.
SUBSECTION F SAYS, THE COMMISSIONER'S COURT IS NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE THE NOTICE BY MAIL UNDER SUBSECTION C IF THE PLAT REVISION ONLY COMBINES EXISTING TRACKS.
NOW, THAT DOESN'T SPECIFICALLY SAY IF YOU'RE ONLY MOVING AN EASEMENT, BUT I THINK IT'S CLEAR IF YOU READ ALL OF CHAPTER 2 32.
IT'S ALL BASED ON SUBDIVISION, A DIVISION OF LAND.
AND LIKE KEN SAID, YOU'RE NOT GOING HERE THAT FAR.
WE'RE NOT GOING NEAR THAT FAR.
AND THE OTHER POINT I POINT OUT IS, AGAIN, IF WE NOTICE THIS THING, WE START OVER.
IF OUR BUYER WASN'T GONNA QUIT ON US, WE NOTICED IT GAVE 30 DAYS, PUBLISHED THE THREE TIMES IN THE PAPER, SENT NOTICE TO EVERYBODY OUT THERE, AND ALL 17 OF 'EM SHOWED UP AND SAID, WE OPPOSE THIS.
I BELIEVE THE LAW IS THAT YOU COULDN'T DENY A REPL ON THAT BASIS BECAUSE THERE, AS ACCORDING TO SUBSECTION D ONE, IT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH THE ESTABLISHED RIGHTS OF ANY OWNER OF A PART OF THE SUBDIVIDED LAND.
I'M COMFORTABLE WITH THAT, THAT SECTION.
AND I, I HAVE A MOTION, AND I KNOW THIS, THIS WILL BE THE, YOU KNOW, FIRST AND LAST TIME THERE'S EVER BEEN SPLIT COURT.
WELL, I'M GONNA CHANGE MY MOTION.
UH, I'M GONNA WITHDRAW MY MOTION TO THE, AND UH, LIKE I SAY, IT WON'T BE THE, WELL, IT SURE WON'T BE THE FIRST TIME I'VE BEEN ON LOUISIANA SLIP BOTH, BUT
MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY, IS THERE A SECOND? SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SHANE.
ANY MORE DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
SEE THERE AGAIN? MOTION CARRIED.
I'VE GENTLEMEN, WE'LL TRY TO HAVE CLEANER, EASIER
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.
DO YOU NEED ANY OF THESE COPIES BACK? NO, SIR.
AND, UH, YOU CAN KEEP, WELL, YOU MAY WANT 'EM OFF YOUR DESK.
I'VE GOT A FULL SET SIZE VERSION, WHICH I'LL GET.
JUDGE, WOULD YOU LIKE THAT COME, YOU THAT GO TO THE CLERK? IT COMES TO ME FIRST WE GO GET IT AND BRING IT BACK INTO, IF THAT'S OKAY.
ACTUALLY, I DISCUSSED CONSIDER REQUEST CABLE AND DROP WIRE ACROSS AND THE RIGHT OF WAY OF COUNTY ROAD ONE FIFTY THREE.
FINALLY, WE'RE GETTING TELEPHONES IN MY PRECINCT COMMISSIONER RATHER MAKE THAT MOTION.
COMMISSIONER SECONDS IT ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION CARRIES.
UH, NOW WHAT THEY WANT, DO IT ON PRECINCT.
NOW WE GOT A ELECTRIC CO-OP INSTALL AN OVERHEAD ACROSS AND ACROSS.
THAT'S NUMBER ELECTRICITY BY COMMISSIONER SHANE.
[00:45:02]
NOW WE'VE GOT TWO DALLAS CROWN BEFORE NOVEMBER 30TH.I MOVE THAT WE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THAT REPORT, JUDGE.
AND IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND BY COMMISSIONER.
NOW FOR THE DECEMBER THE SECOND I MOVE THAT WE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THAT REPORT ALSO BY COMMISSIONER LEONARD ALL, DO WE HAVE ANY LINEUP TRANSFER AT THIS LAST MEETING OF THE YEAR? NO, SIR, WE DON'T.
YOU GONNA MAKE US PAY SOME AND I JUST WANT POINT OUT, UH, I DON'T THINK I WENT OVER 25%, BUT IF I DID, IT WASN'T MY LIFE.
AND THERE HADN'T BEEN A LONG WHILE, JUDGE, I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT.
I THOUGHT THEY ALL WERE SEALED.
I'LL GET ONE DELIVERED OVER TO YOU WE'RE YEAH, THAT DID TURN INTO A BIG GAME.
HEY JUDGE, I FIGURED OUT A WAY WHERE I'M REALLY GOING TO, I COULD GET ON TV WHERE MY SANTA SUIT AND HOLD A BAG OF CHARCOAL SAYS TOLL
THAT'S, OH MAN, THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT.
HE SAID IT AND THEN ADMIT TO IT.
IT'S BECAUSE HE WAS IN MY FACE.
HE WANTS TO HANG ALL OVER YOU IF HE CAN.
[00:50:01]
I SURE WOULD LIKE QUIT HEARING ABOUT TERRELL.WELL, I'M AFRAID THAT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN.
HE LL I WONDER IF HE'LL BE BACK NEXT YEAR.
IS THERE ANY REASON FOR THIS IF HIS CONTRACT TO BE REUSED WORKS? I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND.
WELL, WHAT HE WOULD MAKE ONE GAME, I THINK THEY BAIL FOR QUINCY TAR.
HE PAID A HUNDRED DOLLARS TO BAIL QUINCY TAR OUT OF JAIL.
AND THE NEWSPAPER APPARENTLY CHEWED HIM OUT BECAUSE HE WAS INTERFERING WITH A NEWS STORY THE ONE TIME HE DOES SOMETHING.
NO, MICKEY, WHAT, WHERE WOULD THE SWEARING IN BE COURT'S GONNA BE IN JUDGE TY COURT? JUDGE UHHUH SIX.
WHAT TIME AT 10 O'CLOCK? I THINK.
I THOUGHT IT WAS 10 O'CLOCK TOO.
SHOULDN'T TELL AND THEN DON'T HAVE, THEY'RE GONNA HAVE A WHAT'S THAT TO ANNOUNCE THE JUDGE IT ON STANDING.
ONE STANDING OR ONE BENCH? I THINK THE ONE STANDING, THE FIRST ONE WAS A LITTLE TOO WELL, BUT, UM, SO 10 O'CLOCK MONDAY, IS THAT RIGHT? 10 O'CLOCK A WEEK FROM MONDAY.
[00:55:01]
YOU TOOK THE PICTURE AND THEY DON'T HAVE A LITTLE, THEY DON'T HAVE A LITTLE RECEPTION OR SOMETHING.I PROBABLY, WELL, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN WATCH IT FROM NEW YORK AT 11.
Y'ALL TO PAY THE BILLS, PLEASE.
GIVE US ANOTHER MINUTE, CHIEF.
THE SWEARING ENDS AT 10 O'CLOCK ON MONDAY, JANUARY THE SECOND.
IS IT THE FIRST, FIRST FIRST 86 DISTRICT COURT IN TRAINING AT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TRAINING CRIMINAL? DON'T I CAN TWO.
AND THEN WE GOT ALL THOSE LETTERS.
WELL, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU OWE ANY MONEY OR NOT.
YOU DON'T OWE ANY MONEY ON THIS TRANSAC OWE HE STILL OWE 10 YEARS AGO.
ACTUALLY, Y'ALL, YOU AND I ON TABLE, THOSE
[01:00:01]
OTHER GUYS KNOW US.I I WAS THE ONE THAT'S, YOU'RE THE THAT'S RIGHT.
MOST, UH, COMMISSIONER DUN MAKES THE MOTION TO PAY THE BILLS.
AND COMMISSIONER SHANE SECONDED.
ALL IN FAVOR? THE AYE WE ADJOURN.
I WANT Y'ALL TO WITNESS WHAT I'M DOING HERE AND OFF THE COUNTY.
I, UM, WHEN WE MOVED INTO THE SUB COURTHOUSE, THE AUDITOR TOLD ME THAT THE COUNTY WOULD PAY FOR A REFRIGERATOR.
AND THEN WHEN I SUBMITTED THE BILL, THE COUNTY DIDN'T PAY FOR THE REFRIGERATOR.
SO, SO PAY COFFEE PIPE THEN COFFEE PIPE THEN.
SO THE REFRIGERATOR THAT TOOK THE SUB COURTHOUSE WAS MAC.
WELL, AT THE SURPLUS PLACE IN FORT WORTH, THEY HAD A WORKING REFRIGERATOR FOR $20.
AND SO I BOUGHT, I BOUGHT IT AND UH, THAT'S A CHECK FOR $20.
SO THE COUNTY DIDN'T PAY FOR THE REFRIGERATOR.
AND I'M TAKING MY REFRIGERATOR HOME.
UM, THIS OUR LAST MEETING IS ANYTHING YOU WANT SAY COME JUST, JUST WANT TO TELL Y'ALL, YOU KNOW, I APPRECIATE SERVING ON COMMISSIONER'S BOARD.
IT'S BEEN A AWFUL LOT OF CHANGES AND, AND, UM, IN EIGHT YEARS WE HAVE LITERALLY, WE HAVE JUST ABOUT DOUBLED IN, IN POPULATION.
UM, AND, UM, YOU KNOW, BEEN A LONG, HARD, HARD ROAD TO MAKE SURE THAT THE GROWTH WAS QUALITY GROWTH AND, AND, UH, I, I THINK, I THINK WE AS A COURT HAVE HAVE DONE A GOOD JOB.
AND I WOULD JUST ENCOURAGE Y'ALL TO, TO CONTINUE TO MAKE, MAKE SURE PEOPLE ARE, YOU KNOW, HOUSES ARE GONNA COME, PEOPLE ARE GONNA COME.
JUST MAKE SURE IT'S AS HIGH QUALITY AS WE CAN.
AND, UH, BUT I, I HAVE, I HAVE ENJOYED WORKING WITH Y'ALL AND HOPE Y'ALL WITH ME BEEN A UNIQUE EXPERIENCE.
I JUST THINK YOU'VE BEEN A BIG PART OF THE MAKING COUNTY SUBDIVISION QUALITY.
WHEN I CAME HERE, REMEMBER FOUR YEARS AGO, WE HAD SOME PROBLEMS AND I, YOU DONE GREAT JOB GETTING, I DON'T THINK WE'RE GONNA HAVE THE COOPER, THE CLASS THAT WE HAD, DID WE COME INTO THE COMPUTER AGE AND I THE LAST I WOULD SAY SIX OR EIGHT YEARS, YOU HAVE TOTALLY SEEN THIS COUNTY COMPLETELY CHANGE IN THE NEXT AGE TO 10 YEARS, YOU'RE GONNA SEE IT CHANGE AGAIN.
IT, IT'S, UH, DALLAS COUNTY JUST DID BIGGEST FAVOR US AND COLLEGE COUNTY, EVERYBODY WITH WHAT HAPPENED IN ELECTION DURING THIS LATE CYCLE.
PEOPLE ARE COMING TO GUYS, UH, TINA'S HAVING PROBLEM WITH A COMPUTER AND SO SHE'S BASICALLY ASKING FOR COMPUTER FOR CHRISTMAS.
SO I SAID, WELL, I'LL TELL YOU WHAT WE'LL DO.
WE'LL WE'LL GET A FAMILY COMPUTER.
IT'LL BE OUR CHRISTMAS PRESENT TO, TO TO PROVIDED ONE THING.
SHE SAID, WHAT'S THAT? I SAID, YOU TEACH HOW TO USE IT.
NOW YOU, NOW YOU GETTING COMPUTER YOURSELF.
UH, WELL, DON'T, IT'S BEEN A GOOD RUN, Y'ALL.
UH, BE CAREFUL OVER THE HOLIDAYS AND WHEN Y'ALL SEE ME NEXT TIME I'LL BE A YEAR OVER.
SO NEXT MONDAY, MERRY CHRISTMAS OR HAPPY BIRTHDAY VOTE.
SO, UH, Y'ALL TAKE CARE AND MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYBODY.