* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:05] WE ASK, UH, COMMISSIONER ROW TO OPEN THIS UP ON THIS, UH, FIRST MEETING OF AUGUST, FIRST MEETING OF AUGUST. PLEASE PRAY MR HAVING THE FOLLOW PRIVILEGE, AN OPPORTUNITY OF GATHERING TOGETHER LIKE THIS, TO DO THE BUSINESS OF THE COUNTY. PLEASE LOOK DOWN UPON US WITH FAVOR AND, UH, GIVE US THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING TO MAKE THE CORRECT DECISION. YOU THANK THE, FOR THE MANY BLESSING THAT THE HOUSE GIVEN US ALL THROUGHOUT THE YEAR. UH, WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU LOOK DOWN ON COMMISSIONER ER'S WIFE JODY, AS SHE UNDERGOES SOME SURGERY ON HER, UH, KNEES THIS WEEK, TOMORROW. SO BE WITH HER AND BE WITH HIM AS THEY, UH, GO THROUGH THESE TROUBLING TIMES. BE WITH THEIR SOLDIERS AS THEY PUT THEMSELVES IN HARM'S WAY, AND, UH, DO EVERYTHING TO BRING THEM HOME AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. ALL THIS WE ASK IN JESUS NAME, ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION, ANOTHER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY, JUSTICE, TEXAS, TEXAS. ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE INDIVIDUAL. OKAY, Y'ALL BRIEFLY BEEN PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS? IF THERE ARE NONE, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. MOTION CARRIED. UH, I'D LIKE TO READ THIS, UH, ROUTINE CORRESPONDENCE. YOU GOT TWO OF THEM, THREE OF THEM. ONE'S FOR, AND ONE'S FOR, UH, JACK. SORRY, JUDGE. I HAD ANOTHER I'D GIVE SHERIFF GENTLEMAN, UH, JUDGE JEN, UH, I MEETING DOING THIS BECAUSE I'LL BE OUT ON VACATION FROM AUGUST THE SECOND THROUGH THE SIXTH. UH, WE HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO DISCUSS THIS OVER THE PHONE, BUT I WANT YOU TO HAVE THIS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND THE, UH, EMAIL THAT SHE SENT US. UH, THIS IS FROM SUSAN DAMAGE, THE PROJECT REVIEWER, TEXAS HISTORIC COURTHOUSE PRESERVATION PROGRAM. DEAR JUDGE JEN, THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTING CAMAN COUNTY'S PROPOSAL FOR RELOCATING THE EXISTING SECURITY EDITION. MY INTENTION HAS BEEN TO DISCUSS THE COUNTY'S PROPOSAL WITH YOU OVER THE PHONE, AND SINCE WE'VE BEEN UNABLE TO REACH EACH OTHER, I WANT TO PUT THE TEXAS, TEXAS HISTORIC COMMISSION RESPONSE TO THE COUNTY'S PROPOSAL IN WRITING. THE THC APPRECIATES THE COUNTY'S EFFORT TOWARD REMOVING THE EXISTING SECURITY EDITION. AS AGREED, HOWEVER, THE PROPOSED REPLACEMENT SECURITY VESTIBULE IMPACTS THE HISTORIC INTEGRITY OF THE COUNTY COURTHOUSE AND IT'S SQUARE IN A WAY THAT MAKES IT UNACCEPTABLE, UH, UH, AN UNACCEPTABLE SOLUTION TO RELOCATE THE SECURITY VESTIBULE. THE NEW ADDITION WOULD SIT PROMINENTLY ACROSS THE PRIMARY ENTRY YARD OF THE HISTORIC COURTHOUSE, SIMILAR TO THE EXISTING SECURITY VESTIBULE, WHICH WOULD LIKEWISE OBSCURE THE FRONT [00:05:01] ENTRY AND ALTER THE CONFIGURATION OF THE COURTYARD. T MEDICAL. ANY STRUCTURE, EVEN ONE COMPOSED OF GLASS LOCATED ANYWHERE ON THE COURTHOUSE SQUARE NEGATIVELY IMPACTS THE HISTORIC INTEGRITY OF THE BUILDING AND SQUARE. BUT A STRUCTURE LOCATED IN OR NEAR THE FRONT OR SIDES OF THE COURTHOUSE, PARTICULARLY WITHIN THE ENTRY YARD, SERIOUSLY DETRACTS FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL AND HISTORIC INTEGRITY OF THE BUILDING IN ITS SQUARE. THC STILL BELIEVES THE COUNTY SECURITY NEEDS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITHOUT ALTERING THE COURTHOUSE SQUARE OR THE BUILDING'S EXTERIOR. AND WITH MINIMUM IMPACT ON THE COUNTY'S SIGNIFICANT INTERIOR SPACES, THE GOAL IS TO ADDRESS THE COUNTY'S CONCERNS WHILE STILL PRESERVING THE HISTORIC AND ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE HISTORIC KAUFMAN COUNTY COURTHOUSE AND ITS SQUARE. PLEASE CONTACT ME SO WE CAN WORK OUT TOWARD A SOLUTION. UH, SHE'S CHANGED THE LAW UP. UH, THE LAW DOES NOT MENTION HISTORIC. THE LAW SAYS YOU CANNOT DO ANYTHING TO INTERFERE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE BUILDING. AND SHE'S ADDED THIS WORK, WHICH IS NOT IN THE, THE STATUTE. HOWEVER, UH, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE THE PEOPLE WE GOTTA PLEASE. NOW, AS Y'ALL WILL RECALL, WHEN THEY MADE THE ONSITE VISIT, THEIR PLAN WAS TO REMOVE THE, THE RESTROOMS ON THIS SIDE OF THE COURTHOUSE, REMOVE THE RESTROOMS ON THIS SIDE OF THE COURTHOUSE, AND PUT THE SECURITY AND, YOU KNOW, TAKE OUT THEIR WALL BETWEEN THE MEN AND WOMEN'S RESTROOM AND PUT THE SECURITY OF MACHINES THERE. NOW THAT'S, THAT WAS THEIR SOLUTION WHEN THEY WERE HERE LAST TIME. AND, UM, SO NEEDLESS TO SAY, UH, NEXT WEEK WHEN SHE GETS BACK IN TOWN, WELL, I WILL BE IN CONTACT WITH HER PROBABLY, UNLESS Y'ALL DIRECT ME OTHERWISE, UH, WE'LL ASK HER AND HER ENTOURAGE TO COME UP AND JUST SHOW US WHAT THEY'D LIKE TO SEE US DO, BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO, I JUST CERTAINLY DON'T WANT TO IMPACT THE, UH, ARCHITECTURAL INTEGRITY OF THAT VIEW OF BUILDING. THAT'S THE HISTORIC, THE HISTORIC, HISTORIC. ANYWAY, GENTLEMEN, THAT'S WHERE WE STAND. CONDITION. UH, SO SHERIFF, THAT PROPOSAL THAT WE THOUGHT WAS A GREAT PLAN, SHE'S TURNED DOWN. SO, UH, LIKE I SAY, WHEN THEY WERE HERE LAST TIME, UH, THEY WANTED US TO TAKE OUT THOSE TWO RESTROOMS ON THE END. AND, AND I ASKED THE QUESTION, WHAT, ISN'T THERE A LAW EITHER CITY, I FIGURE CITY ORDINANCE OR A STATE LAW THAT REQUIRES SO MANY RESTROOMS FOR, TO ACCOMMODATE SO MANY PEOPLE? AND SHE QUICKLY TOLD ME, NO, THERE IS NOT. SO ACCORDING TO HER, WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE RESTROOMS OVER THERE. I GUESS I THOUGHT THERE WAS AN A DA RULE ABOUT THAT. I THOUGHT, JUDGE MONEY PLATFORM, WE DO MORE THAN SO MUCH MONEY, WE HAVE TO BECOME ADA COMPLIANT ALL PULLED OUT. I WOULD THINK SO, YEAH. THE AADA A SAYS, WE GOT A BIG CONFLICT HERE. YOU KNOW, WHAT'S COMMON SENSE IS ONE, BUT THEY WANT IS ONE WHAT AADA A ONE IS ONE. SO JOHN, YOU MAY HAVE YOUR WORK CUT OUT, PLEASE. ALL THESE PEOPLE AND, AND I, I, I WOULD, UH, JUST TELL THE COURT THAT, UH, THERE MAY BE SOME EXEMPTIONS FOR HISTORICAL BUILDINGS OR, UH, ATTEMPTS TO RETROFIT THAT HISTORICAL BUILDING THAT WOULD SEEM UNUSUAL THAT, UM, THAT THE COURT WOULD VOTE FOR ANYTHING THAT WOULD, UH, REDUCE THE NUMBER OF RESTROOMS THAT WERE IN THE COURTHOUSE, ESPECIALLY TO ZERO, ONE OR TWO SEEMS, IT SEEMS, IT SEEMS UNWISE CRITERIA. I HAVE TALKED TO, UH, SOME PEOPLE WHO HAVE CONTESTED, UH, THE HISTORICALS COMMISSIONS AUTHORITY AND THEY LOST THE HISTORICAL COMMISSION. IS IS, IS, UH, I HATE TO USE THE WORD, IT SOUNDS SACRILEGIOUS, BUT IT COMES. SO, UH, JUST WANT LET Y'ALL THAT SOUND LIKE WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO DO WHAT THEY WANT TO DO. WELL, WE PRESENT A PROPOSAL, NOT WHAT THEY WANT. I THINK, UH, I SHARED THE STORY WITH YOU ABOUT ONE TIME WHEN OUR REDISTRICTING PLAN, WE HAD A PERFECT PLAN. WE HAD EXACTLY, THE COUNTY WAS DIVIDED EXACTLY FOUR EQUAL PRECINCTS OF POPULATION. PERFECT. AND, [00:10:01] UH, WE WERE SUED OVER IT BECAUSE THE LINE GOING THROUGH TERRELL WAS OVER ONE BLOCK IN WHAT SOME PEOPLE IN THOUGHT IT SHOULD BE. SO WHEN WE WENT TO THE FEDERAL JUDGE IN DALLAS, YOU KNOW, HE LOOKED DOWN, I SAID, OKAY, Y'ALL GET IN THAT ROOM THERE AND RESOLVE THIS ISSUE. SO I, COMMISSIONER AND I GOT IN THE ROOM AND I JUST ROLLED OUT TO COUNTY OUT TOLD THE LAWYER OR THE PROPONENT OR FOR THE CONTESTANT, I SAID, OKAY, YOU DRAW THE LINES, TOOK 15 MINUTES, DREW THE LINES. WE WENT BACK, JUDGE AND SAYS, OKAY JUDGE, WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT HERE. IT'S, SO I LEARNED THEN THAT IF YOU'VE GOT SOMEONE WHO'S IN CONTROL, THE BEST THING TO DO IS DO IT THE WAY THEY WANT. IF THEY'RE ABSOLUTELY IN CONTROL, WHICH THEY WERE AT THAT TIME, AND THEY ARE AT THIS TIME. SO IT'S NOT GONNA DO ANY GOOD TO FIGHT, IN MY OPINION. YEAH, LET'S GET JOB TO CHECK. I THOUGHT A DA HAD A SPECIFIC CODE THAT YOU COULDN'T DO ANYTHING TO AN EXISTING RESTROOM THAT WAS ALREADY, THAT WAS IN THERE. SO, WELL, BUT SEE, THIS, THIS END IS NOT A DA COMPLIANT. THESE RESTROOMS ON THIS END ARE NOT, THE RESTROOMS ON THE OTHER END ARE A DA COMPLIANT. OH, OKAY. YEAH. WE WON'T BE DOING ANYTHING FOR THE RESTROOMS THAT ARE AADA A COMPLIABLE. WHAT WE'LL BE DOING IS JUST CUTTING DOWN THE CAPACITY AND YOU'VE GOT ON A MONDAY MORNING WHEN YOU'VE GOT 400 JUROR PROPOSED JURORS OVER THERE AND ALL OF 'EM TRYING TO USE ONE RESTROOM, IT GONNA BE A LITTLE DIFFICULT. I WOULD BE SURE TO HAVE VISIT WHEN THE TOURISTS WERE THERE. YEAH, THAT'D BE THE THING. OKAY. HAVING DONE THAT AND HAVING SAID THAT, LET'S MOVE ON TO OUR, UH, ITEM, FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA DISCUSSED, CONSIDER PROVEN LINE ITEM TRANSFER TO FUND SOME EXTRA HELP LINE ITEM IN THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30TH. AND WE HAVE OUR DISTRICT ATTORNEY, RICK HARRISON HERE, AND HE'S GONNA DISCUSS THIS MORNING EVERYBODY. MORNING RICK. WE'VE GOT A, UH, LITTLE SHORTAGE IN OUR EXTRA HELP BUDGET AND WE'RE WANTING TO TAKE, I THINK ALL Y'ALL HAVE A COPY, BUT WE'RE GOING TO TAKE FROM OUR LIGHT ITEMS AND OIL AND GAS BOOKS, OFFICE SUPPLIES AND PARTS AND REPAIR THE AMOUNTS LISTED OVER TO THE SIDE, 1500, A THOUSAND, A THOUSAND AND MONTHLY 25, TRANSFORM THE EXTRA HELP AND SOCIAL SECURITY TO COVER THE EXTRA HELP. UM, THAT'S GOING TO EXTEND THROUGH, UM, SEPTEMBER 30TH. UH, IF YOU SEE DOWN THERE, YOU, WE'VE LISTED THE THREE PEOPLE THAT ARE THE EXTRA HELP AT OUR OFFICE. AND IF YOU GO TO THE SECOND PARAGRAPH WITH THEIR NAMES, UH, THAT LAST, UH, DATE THERE FOR EACH OF 'EM, UH, FOR THE TOP TWO, JESSE KLEIN AND MIGUEL, UH, VELAZQUEZ, UH, THAT'S WHEN THEY'LL BE LEAVING AND THEY WON'T BE COMING BACK. SO THEY'RE HERE THROUGH THE SUMMER AND, UH, MELANIE WALLACE WILL BE THE ONLY PERSON WE HAVE IS EXTRA HELP ONCE, UH, WE REACH THOSE DATES. SO, UH, UH, THAT'S WHAT WE WANTED TO DO AND THAT SHOULD COVER EVERYBODY UNTIL THAT DAY. ANY DISCUSSION I TAKE MOTION. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ROWING. ANY DISCUSSION ON FAVOR? AYE. MOTION CARRIES. SO YOU GUYS, TOMORROW AT, UH, WE'RE AT YOUR PLACE AT 10 30. UH, RIGHT HERE AT 10 30 RIGHT HERE. OKAY, SEE YOU THEN. Y'ALL GOOD? BRING YOU NOT SEEN THAT? WE DON'T INTO THE, THERE IT. OKAY. NEXT ITEM DISCUSSED AND CONSIDER REPLACING AN EMPLOYEE IN TON COUNTY ROAD PRECINCT FOUR. YES. WE HAD AN EMPLOYEE. HE WANTED [00:15:01] A BIGGER AND BETTER THING. I MAKE A MOTION REPLACE THE EMPLOYEE. SECOND. SECOND ABOUT COMMISSIONER JACKSON. ALL FAVOR SAY AYE. A MOTION CARRIES. UH, NOW WE TALK ABOUT HIRING ONE PART-TIME AND ONE FULLTIME EMPLOYEE FOR BRIDGE PRECINCT ONE TO REPLACE A RETIRING EMPLOYEES. WE'VE ACTUALLY HAD THREE EMPLOYEES RETIRE. UH, TWO OF 'EM WERE PROBABLY NOT GONNA REPLACE. AND UH, ONE WAS JUST A PART-TIMER THAT JUST SWEPT UP THE BUILDING AND KEPT IT CLEAN. WE'RE GONNA REPLACE HIM AND PROBABLY REPLACE ONE OF THE OTHER ONES, BUT MAYBE NOT EVEN UNTIL MAYBE IN THE NEXT. SO, UH, BUT THIS, I, I JUST WANTED THAT ON THE AGENDA SO THAT WE COULD, UH, REPLACE THAT IF WE NEEDED TO. SO WE GOT THREE LEAVING. WE'LL REPLACE ONE AND A HALF PROBABLY. ALRIGHT, COMMISSIONER THAT MOTION CLARK WILL SECOND IT. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. MOTION CARRIES. UH, NEXT DISCUSS AND CONSIDER, UH, DESIGNATED ELECTED OFFICIAL OF KAMAN COUNTY VOTING REPRESENTATIVE TO NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT. I SHOULD HAVE ADDED, UH, BEGINNING JANUARY THE FIRST AS I'M VOTING REPRESENTATIVE UNTIL JANUARY 1ST AND I'D RECOMMEND THAT UH, I APPOINT THE NEW COUNTY JUDGE COMING IN. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER DOLLAR. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JACKSON. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. MOTION CARRIES. SO THOSE WILL BE THE NEW VOTING REPRESENTATIVE FROM COUNTY BEGINNING JANUARY, THE FIRST, THE NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNANCE WHO MADE I THINK CATCH WHO MADE THE MOTION? COMMISSIONER ER AND COMMISSIONER JACKSON SECONDED. THANK YOU. UH, NEXT IS CONSIDER PROVING REQUEST FOR A CENTURYLINK, WHICH WAS FORMALLY EMBARKED TO INSTALL VARIED COMMUNICATION DROP WIRE ALONG AND UNDER COUNTY ROAD KNOWN AS SUNDOWN DRIVE PRECINCT NUMBER. WE NEED PHONES OUT THERE, JUDGE. SO I'LL MAKE THAT MOTION. OKAY. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ER. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. A MOTION CARRIES. THE NEXT ONE THEY WANT TO DO IS IN PRECINCT FOUR ON COUNTY ROAD 40 20. I MAKE THAT MOTION JUDGE. AND IS THERE A SECOND? SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CLARK. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. MOTION CARRIED. UH, WE'RE DOWN TO LINE ITEM TRANSFERS. THE DA TOOK MY ONLY ONE WE'VE ALREADY APPROVED. OKAY. I GUESS OR AND FINANCE. YOU SAY THE SAME THING. WE HAVE THREE OR FOUR EXPERTS. PRETTY GOOD. I THINK THE, [00:20:29] I'VE GOT , I DISCOVERED. SET THESE MEETINGS UP. GO FOR SIX HOURS AND IF YOU'VE GOT A BIG ENOUGH WHATEVER YOU COULD TELL EVERYBODY YOU LEADER OF THE DAY. REALLY? AND LEAVE, LEAVE US ALL SITTING THERE ANOTHER THREE HOURS. LISTEN. SAID WELL, HEY, I GOTTA GO. DID JACK, DID HE LEAVE? I THINK IT WORKED HERE. OH, SPEAKING OF THAT, DID YOU LEARN ANYTHING AT THAT YESTERDAY OR FRIDAY? I THOUGHT REALLY THEY DIDN'T KNOW EITHER. SHE DIDN'T GO. WHAT DO WE GOT? STILL PLAYING THE BRIDGE EXPECTED TO MAKE 30 AND HERE I'M 50. YES SIR. MR. HARRISON LAND ITEMS. I GOT THREE OF THEM. THEY 1000. 1000 IN ORDER ON [00:25:05] VA'S OFFICE. ALWAYS HAVE A PRETTY GOOD, PRETTY HEALTHY, UH, WE HAVE ONE SOMEBODY. [00:30:03] I THINK THAT'S EXACTLY IT IS ALL A MATTER ON, BUT YOU KNOW, PEOPLE PUT IT IN THERE AND PUT IT IN. CAN'T GET THAT 4, 9, 5. I REMEMBER THAT EVER SINCE I WAS [00:35:07] PEOPLE ON YOUR CAR AND THE MOTOR FREEZES UP, YOU FREEZES UP OR WHATEVER ON YOUR AIRPLANE, BUT IT'S NOT GOOD. HEAVY. THE WRONG. ONE TIME WE WANTED GO BACK AND I 10 15 AND AND THEY PUT ME ON BLESS, APPRECIATE AND ON TOP. OH THAT'S A, THAT'S A DROP ONES WE WITH? UH, I I I'M NOT, I'M OKAY IF THAT'S, I GOT A PRETTY FAST MOTORCYCLE. OH, I HAVE 19 REAL BIG BIKE. IT'S MORE OF ARS. I GOT ONE THOSE ACROSS AND CAME BACK 31 DAY. I SURE DID. NOW YOU DON'T MAY 19TH I OH THAT PROBABLY BECAUSE WENT FOUR PRETTY CLOSE TO THAT. WASHINGTON'S GOT A LITTLE AREA CALLED, UH, LONG ISLAND. LONG ISLAND ULA. AND THAT'S WHERE ACTUALLY WHEN I RAN OUT, FINALLY RAN OUTTA ASPHALT. THERE WAS, THAT'S WHERE I, AND THEN I WENT ACROSS RIGHT THERE BRIDGE. I WANTED TO DO THAT. I WANNA SEE REDWOOD. I, AND THIS WAS, HE, [00:40:09] THERE WAS A COUNTY IN AND THEY WENT THROUGH GETTING, COMPARING PRICES COST TO ALUMINUM. SO THEY WENT AHEAD AND ALL OF THAT. IF YOU, UH, BUT IF WE DON'T GET DOWN NOW, IF THEY THOUSAND DOLLARS A DAY THEY GO BACK. THAT'S GOOD. I MEAN THAT'S GOOD. THAT'S WHAT I WANT BECAUSE I READ THAT. I GAVE US A COPY. I GOT A COPY OF THAT LETTER. HE SAYS, I READING THAT LETTER, HE SAID, HE SAID YOU WERE PLANNING THE BUDGET. WE WELL, OKAY. ARE THEY THEY WORSE? ARE THEY WORSE IN TEXTILE? ARE THEY I KNOW. DO SOMETHING. SHE WENT TO NO PROBLEM. I DON'T WANT YOU DOWN. YOU KNOW, I'M DON'T HOW MUCH IT COST YOU. I SAID IT LOOKS LIKE YOU MAKING GET SOME SECURITY IN THAT BUILDING. UH, BUT NOW WE HAVE, WE HAVE RIGHT, BUT THAT'S NOT SUFFICIENT WAS SUFFICIENT AS FAR AS SECURING THE BILLS. BUT WHEN WE PUT THAT VESTIBULE OUT THERE, WE COULD HAVE THAT WALL AND ARCHITECT THAT PUT A WALL THERE MADE. AND WHEN WE COVERED IT UP, WE INTERFERED WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING. [00:45:01] AND SINCE WE INTERFERED WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING CANNOT DO THAT TO COURTHOUSE. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THE COURTHOUSE WAS A YEAR OVER AGO. ONCE THAT COURTHOUSE IS BUILT IT THAT WAY, IF LIKE AT THE SAME TIME WHEN WE, I TOLD THE, SO DON'T MAKE THIS PERMANENT. SO IT, AND THEN PUT COMMISSIONER MAKES THE MOTION TO PAY THE BILLS. AND COMMISSIONER JACKSON SECONDS IT ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. A AYE. PAY THE BILLS. MOTION CARRIES. UH, WE'LL BE HERE AT ONE O'CLOCK TO START THE BUDGET. 1 31. ONE 30. ONE 30. PLENTY TO MOTION ADJOURN. MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER TO ADJOURN AND SECONDED BY MR. JACKSON. ALL. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.