Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript


[00:00:05]

ALL WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER.

MIKE, WELCOME TO, UH, MAY 29TH, REGULAR MEETING OF THE KAMAN COUNTY, UH, MICHIGAN COURT FOR MOVED FROM DOWNTOWN BECAUSE OF THE ELECTION TAKEN PLACE IN OUR REGULAR COURT COURTROOM.

BUT, UH, WE'RE GOOD TO GO HERE AND, UH, THANK EVERYBODY FOR BEING HERE.

WE MEETING THIS MORNING, UH, SOON YOU, SOMEONE IS HERE, WISHES TO ADDRESS COURT, WILL DO ELSE FORM BEFORE YOU BAIL OUT.

WE'LL GIVE THOSE TO THE, UH, SHERIFF, YOU'RE NOT ON THE AGENDA.

UH, WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT WE, THOSE WE'LL BEGIN THE MEETING THIS MORNING WITH INVOCATION BY COMMISSIONER.

WE'LL PLEDGE HIS WIFE.

WE DON'T HAVE FLAGS THIS MORNING JUST TOWARDS THE, THE PARK OUT THERE, THE PARKS.

ANYWAY.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY.

LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

HONOR THE TEXAS RIGHT OUR TO LEAVE TEXAS ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE IN, DON'T HAVE ANY ROUTINE, UH, CORRESPONDENCE THIS MORNING, OTHER THAN REMIND EVERYBODY TO BE SURE TO VOTE.

IF YOU HAVEN'T HEARD, I PROBABLY ALL THE COMMERCIAL, UH, AND, UH, CLOSED AT SEVEN O'CLOCK AT NIGHT AND I BELIEVE RESULTS ON THE COUNTY CLERK'S WEBSITE AS COUNTY.

I HAVE.

I'M SURE THERE BE NUMBER AS WELL.

FIRST ITEM IS THE CONSENT AGENDA, AND THAT IS ONLY HAVE ONE THING THERE.

WE DON'T HAVE THE MINUTES.

BE READY FOR OUR NEXT MEETING, UH, TO DISCUSS, CONSIDER APPROVING REQUEST OR LINK TO INSTALL COMMUNICATIONS UNDER THE RIGHT OF ONE 10 IN COUNTY UNDER WATER.

I KNOW INVOLVED WITH THAT, MR. MAKES THAT MOTION TO HAVE SECOND, SECOND, COMMISSIONER JACKSON.

SECOND.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL SAY I I ITEM NUMBER THREE IS DOING WELL.

UH, LITTLE ASIDE THERE, THE GENERAL FUND RECEIPTS PREPARED LAST YEAR.

THE, I ALWAYS SAY HOW PAYROLL GETS YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS? UH, FOR,

[00:05:03]

UH, BEFORE WE APPROVE THIS? UH, WE HAVE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE OUTSIDE AUDITOR, UH, AS LATE AS LAST FRIDAY.

AND, UH, HOPEFULLY WE'LL GET OUR OUTSIDE AUDIT SOON.

AND, UH, WHICH NEXT PART OF OUR AGENDA THIS MORNING, BUT I KNOW THEY'RE WORKING ON, THAT'S HOPEFULLY AT OUR NEXT MEETING.

WE THOUGHT BEFORE WE MIGHT, MIGHT EVEN HAVE A SPECIAL MEETING PERHAPS TO ACCEPT THAT I ACCEPT MOTION.

COMMISSIONER JACKSON MAKES THAT MOTION.

SECOND MOTION DISCUSSION.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

JUST LIKE SAYS ON THE AGENDA.

ALL RIGHT, ITEM NUMBER FOUR IS TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER RECOGNIZING THE STAR TRANSIT OPERATION.

OMEGA HAW HERE THIS MORNING FOR RECEIVING THE TEXAS TRANSIT ASSOCIATION IN THOUSAND 12.

OUTSTANDING RURAL COMMISSIONER SERVES ON THAT BOARD AND I BELIEVE WE HAVE A, YOU MAY BE TRYING TO VOTE.

YEAH, SHE, SHE JUSTLY GOES ALONG WITH EVERYTHING THE JUDGE DOES A GOOD, WE NEED TO ACT ON THAT OR AIR CONDITION.

ALRIGHTY.

ITEM NUMBER FIVE IS, UH, HERE FROM GEORGE CONCERNING, UH, THE CONTRACT THAT BEEN GOING ON DISCUSSING THE COUNTY FINANCIAL SOFTWARE.

THIS, THIS DISCUSSION HAS BEEN GOING ON AT LEAST FOR A YEAR, I THINK NOW.

SO HOPEFULLY WE'RE GETTING CLOSER, BUT GETTING MOVING FORWARD.

JUDGE, I THINK WE'VE ABOUT BEAT THIS ONE TO DEATH.

THANKS TO ALL THE FOLKS INVOLVED.

COMMISSIONER CLARK HAS BEEN VERY MUCH INVOLVED.

YOU'VE BEEN INVOLVED.

THE BOTTOM LINE IS WE PRETTY MUCH NARROWED IT DOWN TO TWO VENDORS.

UH, THE TYLER INCO PRODUCT AND STW, THANKS, OUR NEW AUDITOR.

WE HAVE A NEW PLAYER, WHICH I THINK IN INFORMAL, UH, REVIEW LAST WEEK WE DIDN'T MEET OFFICIALLY BECAUSE THE FOLKS WERE OUT RIGHT ON AN INFORMAL, UM, CANVAS OF THE KEY, THE KEY FOLKS IN DECIDED WE KIND OF LEANING TOWARD .

UM, BOTTOM LINE IS THE INCODE PRODUCT IS ABOUT A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS.

WE WOULD'VE TO BORROW MONEY, WE WOULD'VE TO, UH, THERE WOULD BE A LOT OF RETRAIN COSTS AND PROBABLY ABOUT THE 11TH HOUR WE RECEIVED ANOTHER QUOTE, WHICH WAS A HOSTED SOLUTION FROM PILOT WHILE THE CREDIT APPEARED TO BE, UH, MORE AFFORDABLE WHEN OUR AUDITOR TOOK A GOOD LOOK AT IT AND OVER TIME WE WERE PAYING ABOUT THE SAME.

SO I THINK JUDGE, JUST THE SHORT OF IT IS THERE PROS AND CONS TO BOTH.

AND I THINK AT THIS POINT MOST FOLKS GO, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT PROS OR, I KNOW JUST ENOUGH ABOUT THE SOFTWARE THAT TALK ABOUT IT, BUT I KNOW I'VE, IN ON SOME OF THE MEETINGS DISCUSSED, MY ENCOURAGEMENT BEEN JUST TO MOVE FORWARD LAST YEAR, THIS I BELIEVE WAS CONTRACTED BEST PRICE.

WELL, THE, THE POSITIVE THING THERE WAS WE COULD AFFORD IT WITHOUT,

[00:10:10]

IT WASN'T AN EASY THING TO DO BECAUSE I KNEW I CAN'T INTO IT.

OTHER STUFF IS, SO FIRST YEAR WILL BE A FEW MORE COSTS ASSOCIATED.

WELL, BOTH OF HARDWARE PURCHASED, BUT WE CAN ROLL THAT.

THE GOOD NEWS HERE IS OUR AUDITOR HAS WHAT ABOUT 17 OR 18 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH THIS COMPANY.

SO THAT'S A HUGE POINT.

KAREN, DO YOU WISH TO SAY ANYTHING? SOFTWARE WORKS, LIKE I SAID, I'VE HAD EXPERIENCE WITH IT AND, UH, THE AS HUNDRED AND THE WINDOWS, VERY, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM ANY I CONSIDER INTO THE CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS? OKAY, I HAVE A MOTION, MR. CLARK TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WILL INVOLVE OUR ATTORNEY OF COURSE DOING THAT.

SECOND, SECOND ON THAT MOTION.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

A THOSE ALRIGHT, THANKS GEORGE.

AND THANKS TO EVERYBODY AGAIN FOR WORKING THROUGH THIS.

UH, WE HAVE, UH, I ITEM SIX FOR JUST A MOMENT, GENTLEMEN.

OUR DISTRICT JUDGE, UH, UH, MIKE CHI IS HERE WITH US THIS MORNING TO DISCUSS ITEM NUMBER EIGHT.

AND THAT IS CONSIDERING ENTERING INTO A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH BLAKE'S REGIONAL HMR CENTER TO PROVIDE, UH, SERVICES DIVIDUAL INCARCERATED AS, UH, PROVIDED BY THE TEXAS CODE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

UH, JUDGE CHI HAS COURT GOING ON TODAY, BUT I TOLD HIM WE WOULD NOT DO ANYTHING TO THE OPERATION COURT AGENDA.

WE HAVE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH, JUDGE AND COMMISSIONERS.

UM, I JUST HANDED YOU A COPY OF ARTICLE 1622 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.

AND PURSUANT TO THAT ARTICLE, YOU'LL SEE IN PARAGRAPH A ONE THAT THERE IS COMMAND LANGUAGE THAT ABOUT LATER THAN SEVEN TWO HOURS AT PROCEEDING CREDIBLE INFORMATION THAT MAY ESTABLISH REASONABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT A DEFENDANT PERMITTED TO THE SHERIFF'S CUSTODY AS A MENTAL ILLNESS OR AS A PERSON OF MENTAL ATION.

THE SHERIFF SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE OF THAT TO A MAGISTRATE.

AND WHAT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE HAS BEEN DOING IS PROVIDING ME WITH THOSE NOTICES AND THEN I SHALL, IF I HAVE REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A MENTAL ILLNESS OR MENTAL RETARDATION PRESENT WITH THAT INMATE ORDER AND ASSESSMENT TO BE MADE.

UH, IN THE PAST WE HAVE HAD MENTAL COMPETENCY EXAMS PERFORMED BY A MEDICAL DOCTOR COST ABOUT FIVE OR SIX PER EXAM.

UH, I HAVE NEGOTIATED WITH LAKES REGIONAL, UH, MEDICAL MENTAL HEALTH RETARDATION CENTER TO DO THE ASSESSMENTS UNDER 1622 FOR FIVE PER ASSESSMENT.

PER ASSESSMENT.

AND, UH, THEY HAVE ALREADY DONE A FEW OF THOSE ON THE AD HOC BASIS AND WE HAVE GOTTEN SOME OF THOSE ASSESSMENTS BACK.

BUT, UH, THEY ARE ASKING FOR A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SO THAT THEY HAVE AUTHORITY FROM THE COUNTY TO CONTINUE PERFORMING THOSE ASSESSMENTS.

AND SO, UH, I DO HAVE A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT, JUDGE, I BELIEVE I HAD JENNIFER PROVIDE YOUR SECRETARY A COPY OF THAT.

AND, UH, THERE ARE A COUPLE OF VERSIONS OF THAT FLOATING AROUND.

ONE OF THEM HAD A END DATE OF AUGUST 31ST, 2012.

IT'S BEEN MODIFIED.

YOU HAVE THAT LATEST WARNING JUDGE, UH, PROVIDES FOR AUGUST 31ST, 2013.

YEAH, AUGUST 31.

THAT'S IT.

OKAY, YOU'VE GOT THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF THAT DOCUMENT.

BUT BASICALLY THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT SIMPLY STATES THAT ONCE THEY RECEIVE A REFERRAL FROM HOFFMAN COUNTY, THEY WILL PERFORM THE ASSESSMENT REQUIRED UNDER 1622.

DO THAT AT 1 25 PER ASSESSMENT, COMPLY WITH THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY GET THOSE ASSESSMENTS BACK

[00:15:01]

WITHIN 10 DAYS IF IT'S A MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE, 30 DAYS IF IT'S A FELONY OFFENSE, AND PROVIDE US WITH INFORMATION WHETHER OR NOT THE PERSON DOES HAVE A MENTAL ILLNESS OR IS RETARDED AND WHETHER OR NOT THEY BELIEVE A COMPETENCY EVALUATION SHOULD BE ORDERED AND THEN RECOMMENDED TREATMENT FOR THE INMATE.

SO, UH, THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT.

THAT IS PURPOSE OF THE MEMORANDUM OF MEINA.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER THOSE.

YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, JUDGE? SHERIFF, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS? THIS COURSE IS A NEW REQUIREMENT TO PUT IN BY THE LEGISLATURE AND IT, WE GET PEOPLE IDENTIFY AND GET THEM IN THIS PROCESS BECAUSE, WELL, YOU KNOW, WE'RE OUTSIDE THE LAW.

WE DON'T, ONCE WE GET THAT, YOU KNOW, WE GIVE THEM A LITIGATION, WE, WE WORK, WE A WORKABLE SOLUTION FIGURED OUT WE'LL HAVE BE .

RIGHT NOW WE'RE, WE'RE DOING THAT I THINK IN VERY TIME.

IT'S WORKING VERY WELL.

UH, DR. DAVIS IS THE ONE DOING THE INITIAL SCREENING OF THE INDIVIDUALS AND HE'S GIVING ME WRITTEN REPORTS AND HE BELIEVES THAT AN INMATE HAS A MENTAL ILLNESS OR A MENTAL RETARDATION CONDITION.

AND, UH, I READ HIS REPORT.

I BELIEVE THAT WE NEED TO ORDER THE ASSESSMENT.

I SIGN AN ORDER, WE SEND THOSE OVER TO LAKES AND THEY SCHEDULE THOSE ASSESSMENTS.

THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE WILL TRANSPORT THE INMATE OVER TO LAKES, THE ASSESSMENT IS DONE.

WE GET THE REPORT BACK AND THEN, UH, TAKE WHATEVER ACTION WE BELIEVE IS NECESSARY, EITHER ORDER A COMPETENCY EXAM OR A CIVIL COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS, WHICH WE DID ONE OF LAST WEEK.

UH, SHERIFF HAS AN INMATE WHO IS REALLY BEING HELD A RELATIVELY INSIGNIFICANT, HE'S BEEN IN JAIL A WHILE NOW.

UH, HE BELIEVES HE OWNS FOOD STORE, HE BELIEVES HE HAS A FLEET 18 WHEELERS.

UH, HE, UH, TEACH A LESSON WHILE ABOUT HOW THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN, BUT IT'S AN EXAMPLE OF THE SITUATION THE SHERIFF FACES CONSTANTLY WITH INMATES WHO HAVE MENTAL ILLNESSES AND, UH, THE JAIL'S NOT THE BEST PLACE ON PEOPLE WITH MENTAL ILLNESSES.

SO THIS IS ONE OF THOSE PROVISIONS THE LEGISLATURE ENACTED TO ALLOW MECHANISM TO GET PEOPLE WHO HAVE MENTAL ILLNESSES OUTTA THE JAIL.

AND IN THE TRUTH, UH, FRANKLY, IT'LL BE COST SAVINGS TO THE COUNTY TO GET THE PERSON OUTTA JAIL.

AND UH, THAT'S JUST ONE EXAMPLE, JOHN ONE, I I SEE THERE'S A PROVISION IN THIS AGREEMENT THAT THE, THE COUNTY, UH, FINDS THAT SECTION 21 OF VERTICAL 16 OF THE CONSTITUTION, UH, DOES NOT REQUIRE COMPETITIVE BIDDING.

I DID NOT CHECK THAT, BUT IF YOU WILL ADVISE THE COURT OF YOUR OPINION ABOUT THAT, I WOULD APPRECIATE IT.

OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

DO I HAVE ANY THAT'S PROFESSIONAL? ANY OTHER COMMENTS? UH, AND WE'LL HAVE JOHN LOOK THIS OVER JUST AS A MATTER OF REVIEW, BUT I'M SURE QUESTIONS MR. PARK THAT WE, UH, APPROVE.

SECOND, SECOND, SECOND, MR. JACKSON, ANY OTHER DISCUSSIONS? ALL FAVOR.

ALL RIGHT, NOW LET'S MOVE BACK UP TO ITEM NUMBER SIX AND, UH, WE'RE PLEASED THIS MORNING TO HELP FINANCIAL ADVISOR TOM, ATTORNEY TOM HERE WITH US AS WELL AS GEORGE SOUTHWEST.

AND, UH, WE'VE DONE THIS A TIME OR TWO, I THINK IN THE PAST, BUT WE'VE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO, UH, MOVE FORWARD WITH IT, UH, FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS.

BUT I THINK WE'RE GETTING CLOSER NOW.

AND I, WE'RE WAITING ON THE OUTSIDE I

[00:20:17]

JUDGE COURT HERE FOR THE RECORD.

WIL DALLAS, AS JUDGE WOOD INDICATED, THERE HAS BEEN DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF THIS, UH, PREVIOUSLY.

UH, THIS IS WITH REGARD TO TWO CERTIFICATE OF OBLIGATION AND UH, UH, WE TALKED ABOUT THE POTENTIAL ACTUALLY, UH, AS STANDS BECAME CALLABLE, UH, IN THOUSAND 12.

SO, UH, EVERYTHING IS REALLY RELEVANT, BUT, UH, BACK IN THE FALL RATES AND REALLY BEFORE THAT THE QUESTIONS AROSE ABOUT POTENTIAL REFINANCING AND WE GOT SERIOUS, UH, WORKING WITH COURT AND SO ON.

BUT, UH, AS YOU RECALL, THE PROBLEM WAS WITH REGARD JUDGE WOOD RECENTLY, UH, IN ORDER TO, TO UNDERTAKE A, UH, UH, OFFER IN PUBLIC MARKET, UH, FOR VARIOUS REASONS, IN PARTICULAR NEW DISCLOSURE, REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT AND SO ON, WE REALLY NEEDED TO HAVE FINALIZED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

SO WE'VE BEEN ANXIOUSLY WAITING THOSE AUDIT, LITERALLY WE HAVE EVERYTHING SITTING IDLING OFFICIAL STATEMENT, OFFERING DOCUMENTS AND, AND ALL IT NEEDS LITERALLY AS A WHOLE FOR THE AUDITED FINANCIAL TO BEED.

AND, UH, WE DID THE CONTINUED DISCLOSURE, WHICH IS REQUIREMENT.

WE HAD UNAUDITED PRELIMINARY NUMBERS WOULD SHOW A VERY POSITIVE MARKED IMPROVEMENT IN GENERAL FUND, IN THE GENERAL FUND BALANCE.

UH, AND SO, YOU KNOW, ONCE WE HAVE THAT, UH, LIKE I SAID, FINANCIAL STATEMENT BASED ON WHAT THAN THE PRELIMINARY.

SO ALL OF THAT'S VERY GOOD WITH RESPECT TO DEALING RATING AGENCIES AND ALSO IN MARKETING AS JUDGE WOOD INDICATED.

UH, WHEREAS BACK IN THE FALL WE SAW RATES DROP, FELT A LITTLE BIT OF ANXIOUSNESS ABOUT THE WHOLE SITUATION.

THEY ACTUALLY COOPERATED 12.

SO NOTHING HAS ADVERSELY AFFECTED THE COUNTY BY NOT HAVING BEEN ABLE TO DO THE ATTORNEY PRIOR TO NOW AND IN FACT PROBABLY SAY MORE THAN WHAT HAD BEEN ANTICIPATED.

UH, WHAT I PASSED OUT, REALLY JUST THE PROCESS THAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING AND TOM JUDGE, UH, LAW FIRM IS HERE, YOU CAN EXPLAIN, BUT THE LEGISLATURE YEARS AGO, UH, AUTHORIZED PRIMARILY FOR REFUNDING ISSUE.

SO COUNTY, CITIES AND SO ON TO, UH, UNDERTAKE WHAT'S CALLED A PARAMETER OR DELEGATED METHOD WHEREBY THE, UH, BUT THE, THE, UH, ACTUAL APPROVAL WOULD BE SUBJECT TO PARAMETERS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT, BUT DELEGATING TO, UH, JUDGE WOOD, THE ABILITY TO CONDITIONS IN CONDUCTED CALL AND ALL OF THAT OUT WAY TO GO AHEAD WITH THE PRICE, ACTUALLY SELL BONDS WITHOUT HAVING TO TIE EVERYTHING TO A REGULAR MEETING BEING ONLY.

SO, UH, FOUR, UH, KIND OF TALK ABOUT THAT, THE PROCESS.

AND THEN ON PAGE FOUR, UH, REALLY AS I INDICATED, THE PRIMARY REASON FOR THAT PARTICULARLY CONDITIONS

[00:25:02]

CORRECT.

IF YOU LOOK AT PAGE, UH, SIX, IT JUST OUTLINES, UH, THROUGH 2022 THE INTEREST RATES ON THAT RANGE, 4.55% BY MATURITY, WHICH IS QUITE HIGH.

UH, EXPLAIN THIS, TALKING WITH THE JUDGE AND, AND AUDITOR, UH, AND SO ON AND RECOGNIZE THAT THE COUNTY HAS, UH, SOME KIDNEY NEEDS, BE IT THE, UH, ARMORY OR OTHERWISE THAT, UH, COULD BE MAYBE SO ON.

BUT WE CAN STRUCTURE THE SAVINGS LITERALLY SO THAT UH, THEY CAN ACCOMMODATE, IN THIS CASE IT BE ROUGHLY THREE WE TERMS PLUS OF IMPACT WHATSOEVER THAT SERVICE AND SO ON.

SO BECOME TRANSPARENT AND THAT THE MEANS MEAN IS THAT TAX BECAUSE THE SAVINGS ARE WITH DEBT SERVICE THAT WOULD USE THAT AMOUNT UP.

SO, UH, WHAT WE'LL DO IS IS BE IT SUMMER OR NEXT YEAR TAX ISSUE, SO ON THAT MATCH AND THEN THAT BE PAID OFF WITH IS THE SAVINGS THAT THE REASON WE, UNLESS RIGHT NOW MONTH, UH, YOU'RE GONNA BE TAX 13TH LATE AUGUST.

SO, AND IF YOU DON'T HAVE DEBT OUTSTANDING, THEN YOU DON'T TAX FOLLOWING YEAR THIS WINDOW FOR NOW IN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR ABOUT THE SAME TIME TO DETERMINE WHAT IS OUR NEED, WHAT DO THAT'S BENEFIT C THIS, UH, REFUND ISSUE, UH, HAS SAVE ABOUT FOUR IN TOTAL VALUE BASIS AND THAT'S VERY HIGH.

UH, YOU, I MENTIONED THOSE RIGHTS, THAT 2.0 I'M SORRY ON THERE.

YEAH.

UH, SO THAT JUST SHOWS GOING FROM 5%.

THAT'S THE, WHAT WE WOULD RECOMMEND IS THE STRUCTURE.

THE COURT PASSES THE ORDER AUTHORIZING AND DELEGATING AND TOM EXPLAINED THE THANKS GEORGE.

I BELIEVE THESE ARE THE GOOD WE PROVIDED TO YOU A COPY OF ORDER.

THIS IS A PARAMETER SALE DELEGATED JUDGE AUTHORITY TO THE,

[00:30:01]

THE MAIN THING WE'VE DONE IS SAY TARGET CANNOT GO FORWARD IF YOUR PRESENT VALUE SAVINGS FOR LESS THAN 3%, THAT IS GENERALLY THE, WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER THAN THAT.

DROP BELOW THROUGH PRESENT TIME SAVINGS WOULD BE OUR RECOMMENDATION THAT YOU NOT DO THIS.

IT'S 3% OR BETTER IS JUST LIKE NORMAL BOND ORDER, DEFERRING INTEREST RATES AND BONDS WHEN THE MARKET IS RIGHT, WE APPROVE THIS AND GEORGE WILL TELL US WHEN WE HAVE A BUYER, WE'LL EVERYTHING SIGNED READY TO GO.

THERE'LL BE SOMETHING CALLED A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, WHICH YOU ARE ALSO ALSO AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY JUDGE TO EXECUTE QUESTION THE SAME, UH, FOR JUDGE YES.

PRIOR TO, TO SEE, AND I GUESS I SAW SOME SAID THAT'S SIX MONTHS.

YES, I THINK WE APPROVED IT BACK IN OCTOBER LAST YEAR, SIX MONTH PERIOD.

AND UH, WHAT CONDITIONS DID WE JUST NEVER MAKE THE, MAKE THE, UH, SALE? WELL THAT WITH OUR AUDIT, YOU KNOW, WHERE WE SHOWED WHERE WE WERE, HAD WE HAD ANYBODY THAT BECAUSE OF THAT, BUT EVEN WHEN JUDGE, EVEN WHEN SIGNED FOR JUDGE, IT WAS NOT AS GOOD AS IT'S NOW, BUT THAT WE KNEW WE HAD TO HAVE THIS AND FORTUNATELY A HISTORICAL LOW.

WE THOUGHT THEY WERE LOW THEN.

AND THEN RIGHT AFTER FIRST YEAR, JANUARY LEVEL KIND OF HIT THAT AGAIN IN FEBRUARY AND THEN BOUNCING BUT LOWER RATES THAN THEY EVEN UP POSITION.

HOW WOULD, UH, THAT SAVINGS 1,000,003 IN TWO 14, WOULD THAT BE A, AN ACTUAL HARD AND FAST CASH SAVINGS OR WOULD IT BE SOME SPREAD OUT OVER PERIOD? HOW, HOW DOES THAT REALLY GO? THE WAY IT'S BEEN STRUCTURED IS IF YOU NEED TO ISSUE A DEBT, THE INTEREST FROM THE YOU SAVINGS TAKEN THAT YEAR, DEBT SERVICE, YOUR SAVINGS, DEBT SERVICE, THAT'S WHAT YOU WANNA TRY TO CAPITALIZE TONIGHT.

JUST QUICKLY, AND, AND THIS JUST ON THIS ISSUE, WHICH YOU'LL SEE THE DEBT SERVICE, RIGHT? 7 35, TYPICALLY A REFINING WOULD'VE ANNUAL SAVINGS YEAR AS WE SOME NEEDS THAT DEBT SERVICE.

THAT'S AN REDUCTION.

SO TAX FILL THAT I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO UH, ACCEPT, UH, AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE OBLIGATION PARAGRAPH THERE.

BUT DO I HAVE A MOTION THE REPORT, MR. CLARK MAKES THE MOTION, MR. SECOND MOTION,

[00:35:01]

DO WE HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS OF NOT I ALL FOR VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

THOSE, OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

WE'LL AGREE AGAIN OR ANXIOUSLY AWAITING OUR WE'LL IN CONTACT WITH.

I THINK WE'LL BE SEEING THAT HOPEFULLY IN NEXT.

SO WE WILL NEED TO ACCEPT THAT.

SO THE COURT WILL, I'LL HAVE A SERIES OF DOCUMENTS.

OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

WELL THANK YOU GUYS, UH, FOR BEING HERE TODAY.

THANK YOU.

I APPRECIATE THAT.

LOOKING FORWARD TO GETTING THIS WITNESS.

ALRIGHT, ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IS IF Y'ALL MAY LEAVE IF YOU'D LIKE OR YOU CAN STICK AROUND ANY, OKAY.

ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IS TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER RENEWAL OF AN ANNUAL CONTRACT WITH ORIGINAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT IN CORPORATION HEALTHCARE SERVICES.

IT SEEMS LIKE EVERYTHING WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HAS WHAT? THAT'S ALL.

UH, JIM, I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH CHIEF, HIS STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A RENEWAL WITH, UH, PROFESSIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES FOR IN HE THIS 3.73 ON C, THEY'RE ASKING FOR INCREASE PER MONTH.

A TOTAL, THE PRESENTATION FROM, I'M SORRY, ACTUALLY THE PRICE WILL NOT EVEN I THINK BASED ON THE FACT THAT WE QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

I'LL, UH, ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CONSIDER THE, UH, REVIEW OF THE CONTRACT WITH MR. MAKES THAT MOTION.

SECOND, SECOND, MR. MANNING.

I WONDER, WAKE UP STILL LOOKING.

FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH IT, MR. MANNING? SECOND.

THE MOTION BE APPROVED.

ALL FAVOR SAY I.

ALRIGHTY, UH, ITEM NUMBER NINE IS TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ROAD REPAIRS FOR THE OF COTTONWOOD COUNTY PRECINCT NUMBER FOUR, YES, OF COTTONWOOD, WHICH IS A CLASS C CITY.

UH, HELP.

THEY DO HAVE MONEY.

THEY, SO, UH, THEY AND GET THIS PROCESS GOING AND I RECOMMEND THAT WE APPROVE.

I'LL MAKE THIS MOTION.

HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER TO ENTER INTO LOCAL AGREEMENT

[00:40:04]

PRECINCT JACKSON.

SECOND MOTION.

WE HAVE QUESTIONS.

ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE.

OPPOSED? ITEM YOU REQUESTED THE LAST MEETING THAT I EMAILED THESE TO YOU AND I'M SURE THAT YOU'VE ALREADY GOTTEN THOSE AND REVIEW.

YOU WANT ME TO GO OVER YOU? REMEMBER THE UH, DEFENDER CAME AT THE LAST MEETING AT REQUEST AN ADDITIONAL 10,000 ADDED TO ONE I, UH, THURSDAY AND WE DISCUSSED THIS AND, UH, HE WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE HIS OFFICE SUPPLY LINE ITEM 50, MILEAGE MILLS IN LODGING TO 2,700 INCREASE, UH, CONTRACT SERVICES FOR HIS COMPUTERS AT 4,000, HIS DUES AT THOUSAND 50.

AND BECAUSE WE HAVE THE UH, C PS ATTORNEY FEES DOWN, UH, WE WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THE 10,000 FROM THERE DECREASING BECAUSE YOU HAD TOLD ME TAKE THAT FROM UNDER GENERAL GOVERNMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WE NEED TO INCREASE IT FROM 44,000 TO 56,000, INCREASE 12,000, THE OUTSIDE FROM 35,000 AND OUR POSTAGE IT FROM 69 5 TO 54.

UH, JUSTICE OF THE TWO NEEDS FOUR IN OFFICE SUPPLIES.

WANTS TO TAKE, UH, FOUR EDUCATION CONFERENCE TO COVER THAT JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT TRANSPORTING OF PRISONERS.

I NEED TO INCREASE BY 2000 AND I'D LIKE TO TAKE THE FROM AUTOPSY POST MAINTENANCE I INCREASE BY, TAKE IT FROM CHILD SHELTER NEEDS 300 IN THEIR OFFICE SUPPLIES, REDUCE THE GROCERIES BY THE BRIDGE.

ONE EXTRA HELP I NEED TO INCREASE BY 10 AND TAKE MATERIAL ROAD BRIDGE.

TWO OFFICE SUPPLIES BY 500, TAKE AWAY 500 FROM ENGINEERING COUNTY LIBRARY NEEDS ADDITIONAL 4,000 FOR EXTRA HELP AND THEY'RE NOT BUYING THE NEW EQUIPMENT.

SO USE THAT.

THE LAST ONE IS THE SOLID WASTE CONVENIENCE.

THE HAULING COSTS FROM TAR.

I NEED TO INCREASE BY 75.

AND QUESTIONS, I'M NOT SURE, TRANSITION TO THE OTHER ADDITIONAL.

THEY HAD TO DO SOME ADDITIONAL STEPS BECAUSE ADJUSTMENTS, YES.

[00:45:08]

QUESTION.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

ACCEPT THE LINE ITEM.

TRANSFER ANY DISCUSS, ALL SAY AYE.

ITEM NUMBER 11 IS TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER CLAIMS FOR BREAK.

A QUICK BREAK.

WE'LL COME BACK, MOVE INTO ITEM NUMBER 11 RIGHT NOW.

DISCUSS, CONSIDER CLAIM PAYMENT.

YOU'VE ALREADY, Y'ALL GOT YOUR BILL

[00:57:16]

THAT

[00:57:16]

DAY WHEN YOU HERE OFF TOOK OFF.

WHAT WAS IT ACROSS THE ROAD? A DOG VAC PREMISES.

20.

OH, YOU MEAN JUST YESTERDAY? OH YEAH.

DID YOU HEAR THE

[01:01:51]

48,000 CREDIT? NO, NO.

I, I DO

[01:09:13]

ONE MY, ONE OF MY GUYS DID THEY

[01:10:26]

A BUNCH OF THE FINANCIAL PEOPLE.

BUSTER.

BUSTER, HE SAID HE WAS ABOUT TWO.

HE KNEW HE KNEW ANDY AND SHE DIDN'T MUCH OF A VACATION.

BUT ANYWAY, I WAS JUST GONNA LET YOU KNOW.

ARE YOU SURE? OKAY.

[01:15:06]

HE DIDN'T EVEN HEAR YOU.

CALLED ME ME ABOUT SALES TAX ON PERSONAL, PERSONAL.

SEE MY WIFE, SHE LOOKED IT UP.

SHE SAID WHEN YOU TALK I SAID, SHE SAID WHAT'S SAID WHAT? WANT KNOW THAT FOR? YES MA'AM.

MAKE SURE.

SO WE WERE ABOUT 12 CANS OFF OF WHAT WE DID LAST YEAR.

SHE CALLED AT LAST MINUTE.

SO I GET, I GET 25 YARDS OF, SO I JUST, WHERE DO YOU WANT THOSE BROUGHT UP? HERE? THEM UP WORKED.

I DON'T THINK SHE WANTED, I GOT A LOT OF BAIL ALL.

DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SECOND? ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE.

THANK YOU GENTLEMEN.

AND OUR, I'LL TELL YOU WHAT, AT OUR NEXT MEETING WILL BE ON JUNE THE 11TH.

I MOVE MEETING.

OH, WE GOTTA HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN.

MOTION TO AJOUR

[01:20:01]

SECOND.