[00:00:05]
POWERS ALLIANCE, I WOULD MAKE THAT MOTION.
WE HAVE A MOTION FOR COMMISSIONER MAN.
THOSE OPPOSED? ITEM NUMBER THREE IS TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER AN IMPROVING ON
AND THIS ALSO I BELIEVE, WAS ON THE AGENDA FOR MR. MEANING? YES, SIR.
THIS HAS TO DO WITH, UH, UH, THE CITY OF CRANDALL IS, IS GOING REDO, UH, LONE STAR ROAD OVER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CRA AND, UH, THEY APPROACHED ME ABOUT, UH, BLADE AND, AND ROLLING IT.
UH, SO WE'RE GETTING AN ANALYTICAL AGREEMENT FIRST, AND, UH, PROJECT AGREEMENT IS WILL BE NEXT.
SO HOW WE MAKE THAT MOTION? DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE COMMISSION? DO WE HAVE COPIES OF THE LOCAL? WE DON'T HAVE, I DON'T HAVE THEM UNLESS, UH, I HAVE RIGHT HERE.
I, THERE WEREN'T IN MY, WE DIDN'T HAVE THEM, BUT, UH, COULD WE, JUST A MINUTE.
COULD WE, UH, PROVE THEM SUBJECT OF, UH, MR. LONG REVIEWING THEM AND MAKING SURE? SURE.
THAT'D BE, UH, TOM, YOU PUT THAT IN FORM OF A MOTION? YES, SIR.
COMMISSIONER SHANE, SECOND THE MOTION.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
THOSE OPPOSED? ITEM NUMBER FOUR, UH, IS TO CONSIDER A PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH THE, UH, CITY OF, UH, CRANDALL FOR LAING, AND ROLLING THE LONG STORY ROAD.
THIS WILL BE THE PROJECT THAT CITY OF CROWN WILL WANNA DO, AND I DO HAVE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT HERE THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN, UH, SIGNED BY.
AND I HAVE A PROJECT AGREEMENT HERE THAT, UH, STATE TO BLADE AND ROLL 30, 3800 FEET OF LONG STAR ROAD.
UH, AND THAT'S BASICALLY ALL IT IS.
AND IT'S GONNA COST ABOUT $490 AND THEY NEED ANY WATER CITY WILL SUPPLY THE WATER.
THAT'S ABOUT THREE HOURS TO, UH, ANY QUESTIONS? I GUESS THE SAME THING SUBJECT TO JOHN.
SUBJECT JOHN'S PRE YEAH, I WOULD MAKE THAT MOTION.
SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CLARK AND THE OTHER DISCUSSION.
AND I GUESS WHAT WE NEED TO START MAKING AS A MATTER OF ROUTINE IS, UH, HAVE MAKE SURE WE, WE HAVE A COPY OF THOSE SO WE CAN SEND THEM THE PACKET WHENEVER WE DO SO, JOHN.
UH, THE NEXT ITEM IS, UH, ONE TO DISCUSS ITEM NUMBER FIVE, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER AN INTERLOCAL COOPER AGREEMENT BETWEEN CA COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE CITY OF TY, TEXAS.
AND I BELIEVE YOU HAVE COPIES OF THOSE, UH, AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN WORKED AND REWORKED, I BELIEVE.
AND, UH, COMMISSIONER, I KNOW YOU'VE BEEN IN TOUCH WITH THE CITY AND ALONG WITH, UH, MR. LONG, UH, DO YOU HAVE ANY, ANYTHING YOU WANNA SAY BEFORE WE NO, I THINK WE GOT IT RIGHT NOW.
SECOND, UH, SECOND FROM, UH, COMMISSIONER ZALE.
ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.
A THOSE OPPOSED, AND, UH, ITEM, JOHN, I SHOULD HAVE ASKED YOU EVERYTHING.
I KNOW YOU, THE CITY ATTORNEY.
WE, I SHOULD HAVE REPRESENTED, UH, RECOGNIZED.
WE HAVE THE CITY MANAGER HERE FROM CAROL TORY, UH, EDWARDS.
THIS STEVE ROGERS, THE CITY ENGINEER.
THANK YOU GUYS FOR, UH, BEING HERE THIS MORNING.
AND, UH, WE, WE APPRECIATE THAT.
UH, NO, IF, IF IT IS, IF IT'S THE ONE THAT, UH, MARYVALE RAMEY AND IN OUR OFFICE HAD APPROVED IT.
SO SHE REPRESENTED TO US THAT IT HAD BEEN SIGNED, I THINK ON FRIDAY.
YEAH, ALRIGHTYY, UH, ITEM NUMBER SIX IS TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER APPROVING PROJECT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TERRELL AND COFFMAN COUNTY, TEXAS FOR REPAIRS TO A SECTION OF COFF GROVE FROM STATE HIGHWAY 2 0 5 TO LOVER'S LANE IN THE CITY OF CARROLL.
AND I BELIEVE YOU DO HAVE A PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THAT.
[00:05:01]
15,000.SO IS, IS THIS TO BE DONE UNDER TWO 15? 2 51 0 15 WHERE THERE'S NO CHARGE TO THE CITY, WHATEVER, UH, JOHN PUT HERE.
WE CHARGE FOR, FOR, UH, EQUIPMENT.
IS THAT NOT RIGHT? YOU AS, AS TO WHAT THE CITY IS BEING CHARGED? YEAH, JUST, JUST LABOR IS WHAT THEY'RE BEING CHARGED.
I THINK THAT'S SO YOU ARE NOT CHARGED IN THE CITY FOR USE OF THE COUNTY.
THAT WAS THE LOCAL AGREEMENT THAT WAS THERE LAST YEAR.
UH, IS THAT STILL GOOD? OUR LOCAL AGREEMENT? YEAH.
THERE, THERE WAS ONE AGREEMENT IN THE FACT FOR THE USE OF EQUIPMENT AND THERE'S ONE THAT Y'ALL PASSED TODAY.
TORY, YOU HAVE ANYTHING THAT YOU HAVE STEVE WOULD LIKE TO ADD TO THAT? I KNOW AND MARY GA'S HERE AS WELL, SO I I DIDN'T DID YOU JUST COME IN? I JUDGE JUST CAME ACROSS THE STREET FROM 86.
WELL, I I WOULD'VE RECOGNIZE YOU ALL GO UP TO ANSWER THE QUESTION EARLIER.
UH, BY COMMISSIONER CLARK, UH, IN TERMS OF THE RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT, WE UNDERSTOOD THAT EQUIPMENT WOULD BE RENTED FOR NOT ONLY, UH, NOT SOLELY THE TAROT PROJECT, BUT OTHER COUNTY RELATED PROJECTS.
SO THE PROPORTION OF COST FOR ONLY THE TAROT PROJECT FOR THE RENTAL.
ANSWER THE, WELL, THAT'S DIFFERENT WHAT YOU JUST SAID, WASN'T IT? WELL, UH, IT ALSO HAD EQUIPMENT ON THE OTHER, UH, GENERAL LOCAL AGREEMENT AND LABOR.
SO JUST LOOKING BACK AT A QUOTE FROM, OF COURSE, I KNOW SOMETIMES OFFENSE, THE PRE GETS THINGS WRONG.
NO, BUT, BUT THE QUOTE FROM MR. ROGER BACK THERE, NEVER INTENTION IT WAS GONNA BE DONE AT NO COST TO THE CITY.
AND THE CITY, I MEAN, THERE'S NO ISSUE WITH THAT IN MY DISCUSSIONS I'VE HAD WITH YOU GUYS, YOU JUST READY TO GET STARTED AND AS, AND I'M READY FOR YOU TO GET STARTED.
US TO GET STARTED BECAUSE I SEVERAL TIMES A WEEK AND ALSO JUST FOR SAKE OF PUBLIC, WE HAVE A COUNCIL MEETING.
NIGHT COUNCIL WILL APPROVE MATERIAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT.
SO MATERIAL AND OF COURSE, UH, THE EQUIPMENT RENTAL, WE, WE, THE SECRETARY WILL FUND THAT COST OFF CITY'S FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL.
AND A PORTION OF THE EQUIPMENT.
IS THAT CLEAR? ANY OF EVERYBODY'S QUESTIONS, TOM? YEAH, AS LONG, AS LONG AS, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE I, WHEN I DO WORK FOR THE CITIES, I CHARGE 'EM BY THE AR EQUIPMENT AND I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT, THAT WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE HERE.
AND THIS IS SOMETHING WE MAY, IN A FUTURE WORKSHOP, WE MAY MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL TRYING TO DO THE SAME THING.
WE NEED A STANDARDIZED FORM AND ALL THAT.
JUST CLEAN THIS UP AND MAKE SURE WE DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH, HAVE ALL LEGAL CHARGES NOTIFY EACH OF THE COUNTY.
WE MIGHT MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE USING ALL USING THE SAME AGREEMENT BECAUSE, UH, I KNOW THERE'S, IN MY OFFICE THERE'S LIKE THREE DIFFERENT AGREEMENTS, YOU KNOW, AND, AND THERE'S, THERE'S SOME, WELL, ONE PART THAT I TYPICAL LIKE ABOUT IT IS THAT, UH, THERE'S ONE OR TWO OF 'EM THAT SAYS MAINTENANCE, YOU KNOW, MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE, MAINTENANCE.
AND THEN FURTHER ON DOWN IT SAYS THAT THE CITY SHALL PAY FOR THAT MAINTENANCE AND ALL THAT.
BUT I JUST, YOU KNOW, I'D LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT I JUST, YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANT SOMEBODY TO THINK WE MAINTAINING THE CEDAR ROADS RIGHT OUTTA COUNTY FUNDS.
I WOULD THINK THAT, I MEAN, THIS IS DONE ALL OVER THE STATE, SO YOU KNOW, WE COULD PROBABLY GET SOME OTHER INTERLOCK AGREEMENTS TO LOOK AT.
JOHN, YOU MAY HAVE SOME SUGGESTIONS.
ALTHOUGH I WILL SAY ON, ON THIS ONE, WE KIND OF FINE TUNE THE ONE WITH THE CITY OF TAR.
SO WE'RE PRETTY HAPPY WITH WHAT WE HAVE.
AND THE ONE THAT WAS BEFORE YOU TODAY OF LOCAL A ON BOTH THE INTERLOCAL AND THE
[00:10:01]
PROJECT? WELL, THE, THE PROJECT I MIGHT, THE PROJECT IS SUFFICIENT, BUT, BUT I THINK INTERLOCAL ADDRESSES A LOT OF THE CONCERNS AND, AND, UH, BUT, BUT WE COULD, UH, I THINK COMMISSIONER MANWAY, IT'S A GOOD POINT.WE COULD KIND OF STANDARDIZE THIS SO THAT ESSENTIALLY LIVING ON THE SAME THING, DIFFERENT NUMBERS.
WELL, AND I, I THINK THAT'S BECAUSE I LOOKED BACK OVER SOME OF THE PROJECT AGREEMENTS THAT WE'VE ALREADY DONE THIS YEAR.
IN FACT, YOU HAD WHAT, TWO TWO, I THINK MEETING.
WELL WE DID ONE, WE DID, WE DID ALL OF OUR INTER LOCAL, WE HAD PROJECT.
WE REVISIT, WE'VE BEEN USING DIFFERENT, AND IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT'S, THINK THE ONE THAT THEY DID WITH CITY JOURNALISTS WOULD QUALIFY.
EVERYBODY CHANGE NAMES, PROTECT, WE HAD TWO ATTORNEYS DO IT.
SO, WELL I, IN REGARD, I'M JUST KIDDING.
THE WORK HAS BEEN DONE IN THE PAST SINCE IT HAS TO BE A PROJECT AGREEMENT IN PLACE ACCORDING TO THE AARON LOCAL, DOES THAT MEAN THAT THE WORK THAT'S BEEN DONE IN THE PAST CANNOT BE PAID FOR? I, I DON'T KNOW.
I GUESS I CAN ASK THAT QUESTION.
THE 7 9 1, YOU KNOW, CODE SAYS IF THE PROJECT AGREEMENT IS NOT IN PLACE, IT'S, YOU KNOW, THAT THE COUNTY CAN'T ACCEPT PAYMENT OR THE CITY CAN'T OFFER PAYMENT OR WORK WITHOUT THE PROJECT AGREEMENT BEING IN PLACE.
YOU, YOU, YOU RAISE, UH, CONCERN BECAUSE EFFECTIVELY IT'S GONNA BE FROM TODAY GOING FORWARD OF WHAT THEY'RE BILLING, KIND OF WHAT I, IF THE CITY OF TERRELL WANTED TO BE MAGNANIMOUS, THEY COULD, I SUPPOSE MAKE A DONATION THAT THEY COULD PAY WHATEVER THEY FEEL LIKE IS THE APPROPRIATE.
NOT THAT THEY WERE GONNA DO THAT, BUT NO, I I, NO, I'M NOT SUGGESTING THAT THEY MAKE A DONATION, BUT IF, IF, IF THEIR UNDERSTANDING IS WE'RE GOING TO PAY THE PERCENTAGE AS, AS, UH, MR. EDWARDS REFLECTED THEN, THEN AND DO A CALCULATION, WELL THEY MIGHT ADDRESS THAT.
WHAT ELSE COULD, COULD WE FORCE THEM TO PAY SOMETHING BEFORE TODAY? I DUNNO.
AND I DUNNO THAT WE WOULD INTEND TO DO THAT, BUT, OKAY.
I'M COMMISSIONER SHANE HAS MADE A MOTION.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CLARK.
OTHER DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE ON THIS? ALL IN FAVOR SAY I.
NEXT ITEM IS ITEM TO MOTION TO ADJOURN.